<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://consumerrights.wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=173.218.131.77</id>
	<title>Consumer Rights Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://consumerrights.wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=173.218.131.77"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://consumerrights.wiki/w/Special:Contributions/173.218.131.77"/>
	<updated>2026-05-26T05:10:04Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.44.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Intel&amp;diff=54825</id>
		<title>Talk:Intel</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Intel&amp;diff=54825"/>
		<updated>2026-05-26T03:14:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;173.218.131.77: /* Intel Boot Guard */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Intel Boot Guard ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is an issue that I haven&#039;t seen mentioned throughout the whole wiki, and since Samsung&#039;s practice of disabling bootloader unlock is listed in their page, I think it&#039;d be appropriate to mention it here and for laptop manufacturers who enable it on their devices.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What Intel Boot Guard does is fuse a key onto a motherboard&#039;s chipset (usually the CPU itself on mobile platforms, such as laptops if I&#039;m not mistaken) and verify that the firmware being loaded is signed with that key. This restricts what firmware an owner of a device can use, including FOSS projects such as coreboot. [[Special:Contributions/173.218.131.77|173.218.131.77]] 03:14, 26 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>173.218.131.77</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>