<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://consumerrights.wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=JazzyPizza</id>
	<title>Consumer Rights Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://consumerrights.wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=JazzyPizza"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://consumerrights.wiki/w/Special:Contributions/JazzyPizza"/>
	<updated>2026-05-06T18:26:11Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.44.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Consumer_Rights_Wiki_talk:Moderator_guidelines&amp;diff=12859</id>
		<title>Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderator guidelines</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Consumer_Rights_Wiki_talk:Moderator_guidelines&amp;diff=12859"/>
		<updated>2025-04-25T17:15:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JazzyPizza: /* Just a few typos */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Just a few typos ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#* Note: it is permissible for an incident to be positive, as long as it is both noteable  &amp;lt;-notable&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
# The company does not have an existing page, which the artice &amp;lt;- article&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#* The level of managerial independance &amp;lt;- independence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#* The level of managerial independance - how independant  &amp;lt;- independent&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Stub (for an article which is simply underdeveloped: the content currentlyu &amp;lt;-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
lead to deletion if it&#039;s in massive violation of the No Original Reaearch &amp;lt;-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically a limbo to put articles in where their merits can be discussed before a descision &amp;lt;- decision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Demonstrate (through evidence, and assertion by sources, not thorugh &amp;lt;- through&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If the Incident affected only a small hanfdful &amp;lt;-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The article should be neutral and factual,&#039;&#039;&#039; without unneccesarily -&amp;lt; unnecessarily &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A user reported that an Amazon delivery driver accessed their garage through their phone without authorization &lt;br /&gt;
#* Demonstrate a pattern of similar incidents or systemic flaws in Amazon&#039;s delivery authorization &amp;lt;- authorisation?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#* Remove aricle, &amp;lt;-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A person brought a 5-year-old iPhone 11 for battery replacement at official Apple Store in Rio. After a $170 service, both cameras stopped working. Apple blamed previous unauthorized &amp;lt;- unauthorised?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Preceding unsigned comment by DavidBenJr at 04:21, 15 January 2025‎&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The spelling of “authorization” and the like depend on regional standards. Americans tend to spell it with a z, and the z spelling is actually also preferred by the Oxford English Dictionary. This is in contrast to analyze/analyse, where the OED prefers the s spelling. There is some etymological reason that I cannot be bothered to remember. [[User:Mingyee|Mingyee]] ([[User talk:Mingyee|talk]]) 11:53, 20 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-------------&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some additional typos:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. The company does not have an existing page, which the artice &amp;lt;- article&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This should only lead to deletion if it&#039;s &amp;lt;- it is&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aritcles &amp;lt;- Articles (inside categorization table)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a deletion request is determined to be valid, &amp;lt;- (missing comma)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Comment by JazzyPizza, 25 April 2025‎&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JazzyPizza</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Consumer_Rights_Wiki_talk:Moderator_guidelines&amp;diff=12858</id>
		<title>Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderator guidelines</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Consumer_Rights_Wiki_talk:Moderator_guidelines&amp;diff=12858"/>
		<updated>2025-04-25T17:06:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JazzyPizza: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Just a few typos ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#* Note: it is permissible for an incident to be positive, as long as it is both noteable  &amp;lt;-notable&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
# The company does not have an existing page, which the artice &amp;lt;- article&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#* The level of managerial independance &amp;lt;- independence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#* The level of managerial independance - how independant  &amp;lt;- independent&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Stub (for an article which is simply underdeveloped: the content currentlyu &amp;lt;-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
lead to deletion if it&#039;s in massive violation of the No Original Reaearch &amp;lt;-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically a limbo to put articles in where their merits can be discussed before a descision &amp;lt;- decision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Demonstrate (through evidence, and assertion by sources, not thorugh &amp;lt;- through&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If the Incident affected only a small hanfdful &amp;lt;-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The article should be neutral and factual,&#039;&#039;&#039; without unneccesarily -&amp;lt; unnecessarily &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A user reported that an Amazon delivery driver accessed their garage through their phone without authorization &lt;br /&gt;
#* Demonstrate a pattern of similar incidents or systemic flaws in Amazon&#039;s delivery authorization &amp;lt;- authorisation?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#* Remove aricle, &amp;lt;-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A person brought a 5-year-old iPhone 11 for battery replacement at official Apple Store in Rio. After a $170 service, both cameras stopped working. Apple blamed previous unauthorized &amp;lt;- unauthorised?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Preceding unsigned comment by DavidBenJr at 04:21, 15 January 2025‎&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The spelling of “authorization” and the like depend on regional standards. Americans tend to spell it with a z, and the z spelling is actually also preferred by the Oxford English Dictionary. This is in contrast to analyze/analyse, where the OED prefers the s spelling. There is some etymological reason that I cannot be bothered to remember. [[User:Mingyee|Mingyee]] ([[User talk:Mingyee|talk]]) 11:53, 20 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JazzyPizza</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Consumer_Rights_Wiki_talk:Moderator_guidelines&amp;diff=12857</id>
		<title>Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderator guidelines</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Consumer_Rights_Wiki_talk:Moderator_guidelines&amp;diff=12857"/>
		<updated>2025-04-25T17:04:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JazzyPizza: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Just a few typos ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#* Note: it is permissible for an incident to be positive, as long as it is both noteable  &amp;lt;-notable&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
# The company does not have an existing page, which the artice &amp;lt;- article&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#* The level of managerial independance &amp;lt;- independence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#* The level of managerial independance - how independant  &amp;lt;- independent&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Stub (for an article which is simply underdeveloped: the content currentlyu &amp;lt;-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
lead to deletion if it&#039;s in massive violation of the No Original Reaearch &amp;lt;-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically a limbo to put articles in where their merits can be discussed before a descision &amp;lt;- decision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Demonstrate (through evidence, and assertion by sources, not thorugh &amp;lt;- through&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If the Incident affected only a small hanfdful &amp;lt;-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The article should be neutral and factual,&#039;&#039;&#039; without unneccesarily -&amp;lt; unnecessarily &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A user reported that an Amazon delivery driver accessed their garage through their phone without authorization &lt;br /&gt;
#* Demonstrate a pattern of similar incidents or systemic flaws in Amazon&#039;s delivery authorization &amp;lt;- authorisation?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#* Remove aricle, &amp;lt;-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A person brought a 5-year-old iPhone 11 for battery replacement at official Apple Store in Rio. After a $170 service, both cameras stopped working. Apple blamed previous unauthorized &amp;lt;- unauthorised?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Preceding unsigned comment by DavidBenJr at 04:21, 15 January 2025‎&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The spelling of “authorization” and the like depend on regional standards. Americans tend to spell it with a z, and the z spelling is actually also preferred by the Oxford English Dictionary. This is in contrast to analyze/analyse, where the OED prefers the s spelling. There is some etymological reason that I cannot be bothered to remember. [[User:Mingyee|Mingyee]] ([[User talk:Mingyee|talk]]) 11:53, 20 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
------------------------&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some additional typos:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. The company does not have an existing page, which the artice &amp;lt;- article&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This should only lead to deletion if it&#039;s &amp;lt;- it is&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aritcles &amp;lt;- Articles (inside categorization table)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a deletion request is determined to be valid, &amp;lt;- (missing comma)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JazzyPizza</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>