https://consumerrights.wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=Matthias 2026-06-13T13:23:09Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.44.0 https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Airzone_Cloud_moves_to_a_subscription-based_model&diff=55869 2026-06-03T13:26:50Z

<p>Matthias: /* Sourcing improvements and factual corrections */ new section</p> <hr /> <div>== Sourcing improvements and factual corrections ==<br /> <br /> I'm an Airzone customer directly affected by this change and an HVAC installer working with Airzone systems professionally. I have several elements that may help address the sourcing concerns flagged on this article, and I'd like to propose changes before editing directly.<br /> <br /> '''Elements I can contribute with verifiable sources:'''<br /> <br /> # The original Airzone announcement newsletter, archived on the Wayback Machine on May 29, 2026 (the day after the announcement): https://web.archive.org/web/20260529164019/https://confort.airzonecontrol.com/airzone-cloud-fr-systemes1 The article currently dates the announcement to &quot;early 2026&quot; — it was actually May 28, 2026, with the paywall taking effect October 2026 (6-month free trial for existing users).<br /> # A precision on the scope of the change: based on the official announcement, remote ''visualization'' remains free without subscription. Only remote ''control'' (sending commands) moves behind the paywall. The article currently states users &quot;lose all remote access&quot;, which is imprecise.<br /> # Information from Airzone France technical support confirming that the current Airzone Webserver model does not support the local API documented in Airzone's integration manual, and that a separate hardware product (AZX6WSPHUB, approximately €300) is required to obtain local API access independent of Airzone Cloud.<br /> <br /> '''Elements I would prefer not to touch:''' <br /> <br /> The Lawsuit section, including claims of action by FACUA and OCU. I have no independent source confirming these specific organizations are involved, but I don't want to remove content others have contributed without input from editors more familiar with the Spanish consumer protection landscape. <br /> <br /> Would adding the elements above, with proper inline references, be an appropriate way to address the Incomplete flag ? Should I proceed with edits, or would you prefer I draft changes here first? Thanks. [[User:Matthias|Matthias]] ([[User talk:Matthias|talk]]) 13:26, 3 June 2026 (UTC)</div>

Matthias