<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://consumerrights.wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Syl</id>
	<title>Consumer Rights Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://consumerrights.wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Syl"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://consumerrights.wiki/w/Special:Contributions/Syl"/>
	<updated>2026-05-05T08:59:45Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.44.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Tesla&amp;diff=6658</id>
		<title>Tesla</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Tesla&amp;diff=6658"/>
		<updated>2025-01-29T18:37:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Syl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{InfoboxCompany&lt;br /&gt;
| Name = Tesla&lt;br /&gt;
| Type = Public&lt;br /&gt;
| Founded = 2003&lt;br /&gt;
| Industry = Automotive&lt;br /&gt;
| Official Website = https://tesla.com/&lt;br /&gt;
| Logo = Tesla.png&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Tesla, Inc.|Tesla, Inc.]]&#039;&#039;&#039; (formerly &#039;&#039;&#039;Tesla Motors&#039;&#039;&#039;) is a company founded by [[Martin Eberhard]] and [[Marc Tarpenning]] in 2003. In 2008, it was funded and taken over by [[Elon Musk]], when both original founders left their positions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/money/Tesla-Motors&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.forbes.com/sites/qai/2022/09/29/tesla-a-history-of-innovation-and-headaches/?sh=279647518735&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Elon Musk since has taken the company in radical directions since and started on a foot of trying to follow in Apple&#039;s from a consumer protection standpoint, with controversial steps such as requiring subscriptions or requiring a Tesla technician to fix 2012&#039;s Model S,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.slotcar-today.com/problems/tesla/model-s/2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; With cases such as  the continued denial of adding [[Apple Carplay]] or [[Android Auto]] to their vehicles, putting an expiry date on their cars, and making a $100,000 utility vehicle whose warranty is void by a car wash.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Controversies===&lt;br /&gt;
Tesla was early in holding functionality hostage that the car owner had already bought and paid for, when Tesla decided to &amp;quot;offer an acceleration boost&amp;quot; that made the car accelerate faster once the &amp;quot;acceleration boost&amp;quot; software change was bought.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.autoevolution.com/news/refreshed-tesla-model-3-gets-acceleration-boost-in-certain-markets-us-still-waiting-243025.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.teslaoracle.com/2024/11/22/tesla-starts-offering-acceleration-boost-for-the-model-3-highland-long-range-variant/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tesla advertised how good and useful it was that their Tesla Model 3 cars had a hardware radar installed. A few years later Tesla would no longer include the radar hardware in their Tesla Model 3 cars they build from then on. However Tesla kept including the radar hardware in their more expensive Model S (and maybe also Model X?) cars. Shortly thereafter Tesla released a forced Over The Air (OTA) software update that disabled the radar hardware in all older Tesla Model 3 cars as well.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.edge-ai-vision.com/2024/01/teslas-relationship-with-radar/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-disables-radar-model-3-model-y-service-visits/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://insideevs.com/news/658439/elon-musk-overruled-tesla-autopilot-engineers-radar-removal/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; One consequence of disabling the already bought radar was that the older cars now also had a forced Traffic-Aware Cruise Control (TACC) following distance interval reduced from 1-7 to 2-7. Another consequence was that those cars now also had a lot worse ability to be aware of traffic around them which made their autopilot decisions much worse, such as panic braking for no apparent reason.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://teslamotorsclub.com/tmc/threads/unfortunate-new-panic-braking-behavior-from-tacc.331045/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tesla regularly removes car features that everyone takes for granted nowadays eg. their Ultrasonic Sensors (parking sensors) presumably to save Tesla money,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.tesla.com/support/transitioning-tesla-vision&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; most of these changes are done silently with no public or media announcements.Tesla also has removed their hardware rain sensors for similar reasons and similar consequences.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.torquenews.com/14335/are-softening-tesla-model-y-sales-europe-really-due-119-sensor-removal&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tesla once sent a legal threat to a Swedish car repair company called &amp;quot;[[Grufman Bil AB]]&amp;quot; to take down a YouTube video that they had posted that showed them smashing a car component that was supposed to hold up a wheel with a big hammer, showing how that component was made of metal that was a lot weaker than one could reasonably expect. Grufman Bil decided to quickly take down that video and when someone asked them why, Grufman Bil said &amp;quot;because it&#039;s not worth getting sued over,&amp;quot; which indicates that Tesla was possibly threatening to sue people who show important car defects.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Note:&#039;&#039;&#039; Someone who remembers this incident in greater detail and can give sources and proof etc, should modify this paragraph I&#039;ve written so it&#039;s much more clear and trustworthy etc. Someone who has the skills of being a reporter should ask Grufman Bil AB about this and try to find the original YouTube video as evidence of my claim etc. I understand that the legal fight would not be worth it to a small car repair company but it&#039;s important to the overall society to be aware of that Tesla does things like this. Tesla&#039;s argument for why Grufman Bil must take down that video was that &amp;quot;It hurts Tesla as a company financially if people can see that video&amp;quot; IIRC. But the counter argument would be that a car part that uses too weak metal is a danger to Tesla car owners and that they can be hurt physically if such weaknesses are hidden by Tesla. So someone please improve this paragraph because I think it&#039;s important that big companies should not get away with bullying smaller companies like this, and succeeding in hiding important weaknesses in their cars from their buyers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Tesla]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Car manufacturers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Battery electric vehicle manufacturers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sports car manufacturers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Electric motor manufacturers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Electric vehicle battery manufacturers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Articles in need of additional work]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Syl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Category:Tesla&amp;diff=6657</id>
		<title>Category:Tesla</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Category:Tesla&amp;diff=6657"/>
		<updated>2025-01-29T18:35:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Syl: Created blank page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Syl</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>