Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Categories
Random page
Top Contributors
Recent changes
Contribute
Create a page
How to help
Wiki policy
Article suggestion list
Articles in need of work
Help
Frequently asked questions
Join the discord!
Help about MediaWiki
Consumer Rights Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
QIDI
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Purge cache
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Cargo data
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Background== Zhejiang Qidi Electronic Co., Ltd., operating as Qidi Tech, is a Chinese manufacturer of 3D printers founded in 2014. The company produces a range of Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) and resin-based printers for hobbyists and professional users.<ref name="QidiAbout">{{Cite web |title=About QIDI Tech |url=https://eu.qidi3d.com/pages/about |access-date=5 Aug 2025 |website=[[QIDI]]}}</ref> The product at the center of the controversy is the Qidi Tech Plus 4, a CoreXY 3D printer. A key feature of the Plus 4 is its large, fully enclosed build volume with an actively heated build chamber capable of reaching temperatures up to 65Β°C. This feature is critical for printing with engineering-grade materials like ABS and Nylon, which are prone to warping without a consistently hot environment.<ref name="TomsHardware">{{Cite web |last=Bertacchi |first=Denise |date=18 Apr 2025 |title=QIDI Plus4 Review: Bigger is Better |url=https://www.tomshardware.com/3d-printing/qidi-plus4-review |access-date=5 Aug 2025 |website=Tom's Hardware}}</ref> The high-power electrical system required to heat the chamber became the focal point of the subsequent safety concerns.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Consumer Rights Wiki are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (see
Consumer Rights Wiki:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following hCaptcha:
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)