Editing Talk:Pearson (section)

== Expansion of article ==

I've started out with some very brief key points since the article definitely needs to exist. I bought a 100$ book for a uni course since you otherwise cant even see your homework  and they seemed a little sketchy with DRM but not like i had a choice, however then i tried using their software and its the worst technical experience ive had since learning vim. to prevent piracy you cant ctrl+p and save as pdf, every page is a separate pdf that has to load as you navigate, but wait there is more. you cannot use ctrl+f to search, they have a built in search function (that doesnt work properly) for instance trying to "COPY" the word "Exercises" gives you "E xerci s es" and that includes the built in(!) "search selection" and "translate" functions. just to give an example: 


Original ENGlish text:

E arly i n t he sevent eent h cent ur y, t he G er man mat hemat i ci an Johannes Kepl er analyzed

a vast number of ast ronomi cal obser vat i ons made by D ani sh ast ronomer Tycho B r ahe

and concl uded t hat t he pl anet s must move around t he sun i n el li pt i cal or bi t s. H e di dn’t

know w hy. Fi f t y year s l at er, t he E ngl i sh mat hemat i ci an and physi ci st I saac New ton

answered t hat quest i on.


Now. I dont understand a fucking word of that but thankfully i can translate it to danish:


Danish:

E arly i n t the begivenhed eent h cent ur y, t g er man mat hemat i ci an Johannes Kepl er analyseret

et stort antal ast ronomi cal obser vat i ons lavet af D ani sh ast ronomer Tycho B r ahe

og det er konstateret, at han skal bevæge sig rundt om solen i n el li pt i cal eller bi t s.

ved hende. Fem f t i år s l at er, t e ngl i sh mat hemat i ci an og fysik ci st I saac New ton

svarede på hat quest i on.


Ah, much better. Now, this had me intrigued, there is no way anyone hasnt noticed something this major before so i started searching and it turns out Pearson is part of a conglamorate with 180 years of mergers and aquisitions. and they have M&A'd a LOT. To the point where Pearson PLC, their billion dollar parent company, is deeply ingrained in everything related to education in the US, many of their books are used worldwide in universities. Conveniently they are involved in both making tests and the educational material for said tests and the tests the teacher has to take to become a teacher and they spend millions lobbying

according to 

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-48998789

in 2019 they decided to focus mainly on ebooks since they are easier to update and cheaper to make... and they can insert drm and make older books obsolete even faster. unsurprisingly they have gotten continually worse and worse with their focus shifting only towards enshittification which means firing teachers and competent staff in favor of outsourcing to craigslist (no, really) and they have contractors making test questions, many of which are full of mistakes. like problems not accepting 2+2=4 as an answer because the real answer had spaces between symbols and things of that nature. their customer support consists of an ai chatbot which just so happens also to be one of their new policies: AI first. So in summary you force students to pay $100 to access something in every way inferior to a .pdf, littered with errors and if you want help with it you first have to fight to even contact a person. its literally just exploitation, they have downscaled everything slapped ai on top of it and are raking in money with no care for how their actions are harming others. 

in 2022 they got really excited about the prospect of maybe making even more money from NFTs and announced they would make every book an NFT so they could also make money from people reselling books. its as scummy of a business as you can imagine and people have known for well over a decade. 


Im aware this is against the editorial guidelines so i dont intend to add it to the article and im honestly not sure how to approach it. i welcome advice on how best to communicate that they have shown major signs they dont care at all about consumers. they have a BBB score of 1.1/5, the lowest being 1. their trust pilot rating is 1.8/5 and just reading through comments is a clear indicator its not isolated incidents. everywhere i read is full of horror stories but its difficult for me to find good examples because of just how many problems there are

in terms of single sources something like 

Attick, Dennis, and Deron Boyles. “Pearson Learning and the Ongoing Corporatization of Public Education.” ''Journal of Thought'', vol. 50, no. 1–2, 2016, pp. 5–19. ''JSTOR'', <nowiki>http://www.jstor.org/stable/90010507</nowiki>. Accessed 17 Sept. 2025.

is good but i also dont want to just rewrite already well known info  [[User:Nemoresearch|Nemoresearch]] ([[User talk:Nemoresearch|talk]]) 23:15, 17 September 2025 (UTC)