Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Categories
Random page
Top Contributors
Recent changes
Contribute
Create a page
How to help
Wiki policy
Article suggestion list
Articles in need of work
Help
Frequently asked questions
Join the discord!
Help about MediaWiki
Moderators' noticeboard
Report a bug
Consumer Rights Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
League of Legends: Exalted Skins Exclusive Cosmetics
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Purge cache
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Cargo data
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Incidents== ===Spirit Blossom Morgana Skin Complaint (June 2025)=== {{Main|European Consumer Centre on the Lack of Quality Standards for Exalted Skins}} On June 12th, 2025, a consumer from Austria filed a formal complaint with the European Commission regarding the ''Spirit Blossom Morgana'' skin, released as part of the Exalted cosmetic tier. The complaint alleged that Riot Games violated EU Directive 2019/770 by offering a product inconsistent with its advertised features and previous standards. The skin, which required approximately €250 to unlock via loot-box mechanisms, was found to be lacking in key features including multiple transformation models, custom voice lines, and animation polish—elements that were heavily emphasized in marketing materials. The case was subsequently redirected to the European Consumer Centre (ECC) Austria and registered under reference ECCAT-60405. ECC Austria acknowledged the validity of the concerns and outlined three possible paths forward: a refund process through ECC Ireland, a legal review via the Austrian competition authority, and potential escalation through the EU Consumer Protection Cooperation (CPC) mechanism. The complainant opted for the CPC route, seeking broader consumer redress and systemic accountability. [[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Consumer Rights Wiki are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (see
Consumer Rights Wiki:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following hCaptcha:
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)