Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Categories
Random page
Top Contributors
Recent changes
Contribute
Create a page
How to help
Wiki policy
Adapt videos to articles
Articles in need of work
Help
Frequently asked questions
Join the discord!
Help about MediaWiki
Consumer_Action_Taskforce
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
First-sale doctrine
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Purge cache
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Cargo data
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== The Perverted Language of Ownership === For centuries, words like "purchase" and "buy" have been understood to signify the transfer of ownership. Historically, these terms carried inherent meanings: * '''"Purchase"''': Denoted a formal transaction resulting in the buyer obtaining full control and ownership over the item. * '''"Buy"''': Implicitly granted the right to use, modify, sell, or transfer the acquired good without interference from the seller. In recent years, however, these words have been co-opted by corporations to describe transactions that do not transfer true ownership. Many digital retailers, subscription services, and manufacturers of connected devices continue to use these terms while imposing severe restrictions on what consumers can actually do with the products they "buy." ==== Examples of Perversion ==== * '''E-Books and Digital Media''': Platforms like Amazon and Apple encourage consumers to "buy" e-books, movies, and music. In reality, consumers merely acquire a license to access the content, which can be revoked at any time. * '''Software Licensing''': Companies like Adobe and Microsoft describe transactions as purchases despite being licensed, a fact which is hidden in their end-user license agreements (EULAs). * '''Connected Devices''': Fitness equipment, gaming consoles, and even cars increasingly come with restrictions that prevent full ownership, despite consumers paying the full retail price. ==== Implications ==== This shift in language has profound consequences: * '''Erosion of Trust''': Consumers believe they are acquiring full ownership based on centuries-old meanings of "purchase," only to discover hidden limitations. * '''Legal Ambiguity''': The disconnect between traditional and modern definitions creates confusion and undermines long-standing legal principles like the First Sale Doctrine. * '''Normalization of Restrictions''': By co-opting established terms, corporations normalize anti-consumer practices, making it harder for individuals to recognize and challenge these policies.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Consumer_Action_Taskforce are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (see
Consumer Action Taskforce:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following hCaptcha:
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)