Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Categories
Random page
Top Contributors
Recent changes
Special pages
Contribute
Create a page
How to help
Wiki policy
Article suggestion list
Articles in need of work
Help
Frequently asked questions
Join the discord!
Help about MediaWiki
Moderators' noticeboard
Report a bug
Consumer Rights Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
General Motors (OnStar)
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Purge cache
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Cargo data
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Incidents== This is a list of all consumer-protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the [[:Category:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|{{PAGENAME}} category]]. ===Data monetization=== In 2025, GM settled with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) due to its misuse of the ''OnStar Smart Driver'' by collecting drivers' precise location every 3 seconds and driving data such as hard braking and quick acceleration then selling it without informed consent to consumer reporting agencies like LexisNexis and Verisk, which lead to insurance premium hikes or coverage denials.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web |last=Chandler |first=Kelley |date=February 17, 2025 |title=General Motors Settles With the FTC Over Unauthorized Collection and Sale of Driver Data |url=https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/general-motors-settles-with-the-ftc-1706133/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250723212043/https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/general-motors-settles-with-the-ftc-1706133/ |archive-date=July 23, 2025 |website=JDSupra }}</ref><ref name=":2">{{Cite web |last=Mather |first=Ciarán |date=January 17, 2025 |title=GM hit with data-sharing ban from FTC |url=https://www.siliconrepublic.com/business/ftc-gm-general-motors-driver-data-legal-us-motoring-settlement |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250211043345/https://www.siliconrepublic.com/business/ftc-gm-general-motors-driver-data-legal-us-motoring-settlement |archive-date=February 11, 2025 |website=SiliconRepublic }}</ref><ref name=":3">{{Cite web |last1=Sisco |first1=Josh |last2=Nylen |first2=Leah |date=January 17, 2025 |title=General Motors Settles With FTC Over Sharing Driver Data |url=https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2025/01/17/808769.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250214055734/https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2025/01/17/808769.htm |archive-date=February 14, 2025 |website=Insurance Journal }}</ref> They deceived consumers by claiming that some safety features would only activate if OnStar was enabled during purchase. The consent mechanisms was buried in a 29-page ToS and obscured its data-sharing practices.<ref name=":1"></ref><ref name=":4">{{Cite web |date=August 13, 2024 |title=Attorney General Ken Paxton Sues General Motors for Unlawfully Collecting Drivers’ Private Data and Selling It To Several Companies, Including Insurance Companies |url=https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/attorney-general-ken-paxton-sues-general-motors-unlawfully-collecting-drivers-private-data-and |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250726133353/https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/attorney-general-ken-paxton-sues-general-motors-unlawfully-collecting-drivers-private-data-and |archive-date=July 26, 2025 |website=Texas Attorney General }}</ref><ref name=":5">{{Cite web |last=White |first=Emmet |date=July 9, 2025 |title=Nebraska Sues General Motors and OnStar Over Allegations of Data Harvesting and Sales |url=https://www.roadandtrack.com/news/a65351080/nebraska-lawsuit-gm-alleged-data-breach/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250815104923/https://www.roadandtrack.com/news/a65351080/nebraska-lawsuit-gm-alleged-data-breach/ |archive-date=August 15, 2025 |website=Road and Track }}</ref> Texas, Arkansas, and Nebraska sued GM for violating trade practices acts, citing lack of transparency and harm to consumers.<ref name=":6">{{Cite web |last1=Anderson |first1=Hope |last2=Rodman |first2=Rachel |last3=Naydonov |first3=Anna |date=March 26, 2025 |title=Arkansas Attorney General Sues General Motors Over Alleged Deceptive Data Practices |url=https://www.whitecase.com/insight-alert/arkansas-attorney-general-sues-general-motors-over-alleged-deceptive-data-practices |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250513105730/https://www.whitecase.com/insight-alert/arkansas-attorney-general-sues-general-motors-over-alleged-deceptive-data-practices |archive-date=May 13, 2025 |website=White and Case }}</ref><ref name=":4"></ref><ref name=":5"></ref> The FTC imposed a 5-year ban on sharing data with insurers and mandated explicit consent.<ref name=":1"></ref><ref name=":2"></ref><ref name=":7">{{Cite web |last=Christie |first=Joel |date=January 30, 2025 |title=General Motors and OnStar, LLC; Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To Aid Public Comment |url=https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/01/30/2025-01940/general-motors-and-onstar-llc-analysis-of-proposed-consent-order-to-aid-public-comment |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250724125828/https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/01/30/2025-01940/general-motors-and-onstar-llc-analysis-of-proposed-consent-order-to-aid-public-comment |archive-date=July 24, 2025 |website=Federal Register }}</ref> ===Inaccessible Emergency 'SOS' Button (1996-Present)=== This practice places a direct paywall on a critical, life-saving feature. The core of the issue rests on the classification of the OnStar system as a cellular communication device.<ref>Auto-Vlog. (2024, January 29). "Here's How To Call 911 With An INACTIVE OnStar System" [Video]. YouTube. Retrieved August 16, 2025, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nM7cqDzchjg</ref> The Wireless Communications and Public Safety Act of 1999 (the "911 Act") mandates that mobile service providers must transmit all 911 calls to a public safety answering point, regardless of whether the caller has a subscription.<ref>U.S. Congress. (1999). "Wireless Communications and Public Safety Act of 1999," Public Law 106-81, 106th Congress. Retrieved August 16, 2025, from https://www.congress.gov/bill/106th-congress/senate-bill/800</ref> It has been argued that by preventing a direct connection to emergency services via its most prominent emergency button, OnStar's behavior for non-subscribers is inconsistent with the spirit of this federal law and the established public expectation for emergency communication devices.<ref>Lopez, J. (2020, June 30). "OnStar Hands-Free Calling Will Be Sunset in 2022". GM Authority. Retrieved August 16, 2025, from https://gmauthority.com/blog/2020/06/onstar-hands-free-calling-will-be-sunset-in-2022/</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Consumer Rights Wiki are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (see
Consumer Rights Wiki:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following hCaptcha:
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
General Motors (OnStar)
(section)
Add topic