https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=--file--file - Revision history2026-06-10T00:46:33ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.44.0https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=--file&diff=56933&oldid=prevSojourna: /* Nevada's anti-SLAPP statute is the primary shield */2026-06-07T00:38:55Z<p><span class="autocomment">Nevada's anti-SLAPP statute is the primary shield</span></p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 00:38, 7 June 2026</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l31">Line 31:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 31:</td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>'''The special motion and the clock.''' NRS 41.660 authorizes a special motion to dismiss. It must be filed within 60 days after service of the complaint, a deadline the court may extend only for good cause shown.<ref name="nrs41660">Nev. Rev. Stat. § 41.660. {{Cite web |url=https://www.leg.state.nv.us/nrs/nrs-041.html |title=NRS Chapter 41 |publisher=Nevada Legislature |access-date=2026-06-02}}</ref> The 60-day window, measured from the date Prowse is personally served, is the most important date in the entire case.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>'''The special motion and the clock.''' NRS 41.660 authorizes a special motion to dismiss. It must be filed within 60 days after service of the complaint, a deadline the court may extend only for good cause shown.<ref name="nrs41660">Nev. Rev. Stat. § 41.660. {{Cite web |url=https://www.leg.state.nv.us/nrs/nrs-041.html |title=NRS Chapter 41 |publisher=Nevada Legislature |access-date=2026-06-02}}</ref> The 60-day window, measured from the date Prowse is personally served, is the most important date in the entire case.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>'''Burden shifting.''' On the motion, the court first decides whether the defendant has shown, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the claim is based on a protected good-faith communication. If the defendant clears that bar, the burden flips: the plaintiff must then show, with prima facie evidence, a probability of prevailing on the claim.<ref name="nrs41660" /> The Nevada Supreme Court reviews these rulings de novo and has confirmed the two-prong structure.<ref name="coker">''Coker v. Sassone'', 135 Nev. 8, 432 P.3d 746 (2019). [https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/nv-supreme-court/1975279.html Opinion via FindLaw].</ref></div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>'''Burden shifting.''' On the motion, the court first decides whether the defendant has shown, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the claim is based on a protected good-faith communication. If the defendant clears that bar, the burden flips: the plaintiff must then show, with <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">''</ins>prima facie<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">'' </ins>evidence, a probability of prevailing on the claim.<ref name="nrs41660" /> The Nevada Supreme Court reviews these rulings de novo and has confirmed the two-prong structure.<ref name="coker">''Coker v. Sassone'', 135 Nev. 8, 432 P.3d 746 (2019). [https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/nv-supreme-court/1975279.html Opinion via FindLaw].</ref></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>'''Discovery is frozen.''' Filing the special motion stays discovery while the motion, and any appeal from it, is pending.<ref name="nrs41660" /> This is the part that defeats the usual playbook of a well-funded plaintiff: Dragonfly cannot bury Prowse in depositions and document demands to raise his costs while the motion is decided.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>'''Discovery is frozen.''' Filing the special motion stays discovery while the motion, and any appeal from it, is pending.<ref name="nrs41660" /> This is the part that defeats the usual playbook of a well-funded plaintiff: Dragonfly cannot bury Prowse in depositions and document demands to raise his costs while the motion is decided.</div></td></tr>
<!-- diff cache key wiki:diff:1.41:old-56350:rev-56933:php=table -->
</table>Sojournahttps://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=--file&diff=56350&oldid=prevLouis: --page2026-06-06T17:22:17Z<p>--page</p>
<a href="https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=--file&diff=56350">Show changes</a>Louis