Anti-privacy legislation - Revision history

ClippyWantsToHelp: /* List of Legislation */ Added on table the Chilean bill 16431-15, and updates on safe digital environments plan

2026-07-03T20:43:30Z

List of Legislation: Added on table the Chilean bill 16431-15, and updates on safe digital environments plan

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:43, 3 July 2026
Line 515:		Line 515:
	\|[[Safe Digital Environments Law]] (Ley de Entornos Digitales Seguros)		\|[[Safe Digital Environments Law]] (Ley de Entornos Digitales Seguros)
	\|Chile		\|Chile
	\|This project looks to follow practices as the ones that have been taking effect in Europe and Australia, to ban users under 16 from social media. It mandates to add age verification methods to social media sites to prevent underage users to access them		\|This project looks to follow practices as the ones that have been taking effect in Europe and Australia, to ban users under 16 from social media. It mandates to add age verification methods using Chilean digital ID (Clave Única) for social media sites to prevent underage users to access them
	\|Age Verification/Censorship		\|Age Verification/Censorship
	\|Introduced		\|Proposed
			\|-
			\|[https://tramitacion.senado.cl/appsenado/templates/tramitacion/index.php?boletin_ini=16431-15 Bill 16431-15]
			\|Chile
			\|Modifies Law N° 18,168 to mandate network providers to add age verification methods to prevent minors to access to explicit sexual content
			\|Age Verification/Censorship
			\|Introduced on November 21st, 2023
	\|-		\|-
	\|Anti-Terror-Paket (Anti terrorism package)		\|Anti-Terror-Paket (Anti terrorism package)

MrTuttle: /* List of Legislation */ Spelling

2026-07-03T19:00:39Z

List of Legislation: Spelling

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:00, 3 July 2026
Line 527:		Line 527:
	\|Chat Control		\|Chat Control
	\|EU		\|EU
	\|Messengers have to have a built-in backdoor to allow scanning of messages. If suspicious content is found (likely by means of a proprietary software), the content is sent to an institution which is not under court oversight.<ref>{{Cite web \|title=Fight Chat Control \|url=https://fightchatcontrol.eu/ \|access-date=2026-06-02 \|website=Fight Chat Control}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web \|title=Stop Chat Control \|url=https://stopchatcontrol.eu/}}</ref> Introduced based on lobbying by a U.S. non-profit called Thorn, a vendor of such scanning software. <ref>{{Cite web \|last=Krempl \|first=Stefan \|date=2023-08-27 \|title=Lobbygeflecht bei Chatkontrolle: "Schlimmste Befürchtungen bestätigt" (Lobby ~~entanglements~~ around Chat Control: "Worst Suspicions ~~Sonfirmed~~") \|url=https://www.heise.de/news/Lobbygeflecht-bei-Chatkontrolle-Schlimmste-Befuerchtungen-bestaetigt-9318337.html \|access-date=2026-07-03 \|website=Heise Online}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web \|last=Breyer \|first=Patrick \|date=2025-02-25 \|title=Chat control: EU Ombudsman criticises revolving door between Europol and chat control tech lobbyist Thorn \|url=https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/chat-control-eu-ombudsman-criticises-revolving-door-between-europol-and-chat-control-tech-lobbyist-thorn/ \|access-date=2026-07-03 \|website=Patrick Breyer - Digitaler Freiheitskämpfer}}</ref>		\|Messengers have to have a built-in backdoor to allow scanning of messages. If suspicious content is found (likely by means of a proprietary software), the content is sent to an institution which is not under court oversight.<ref>{{Cite web \|title=Fight Chat Control \|url=https://fightchatcontrol.eu/ \|access-date=2026-06-02 \|website=Fight Chat Control}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web \|title=Stop Chat Control \|url=https://stopchatcontrol.eu/}}</ref> Introduced based on lobbying by a U.S. non-profit called Thorn, a vendor of such scanning software. <ref>{{Cite web \|last=Krempl \|first=Stefan \|date=2023-08-27 \|title=Lobbygeflecht bei Chatkontrolle: "Schlimmste Befürchtungen bestätigt" (Lobby Entanglements around Chat Control: "Worst Suspicions Confirmed") \|url=https://www.heise.de/news/Lobbygeflecht-bei-Chatkontrolle-Schlimmste-Befuerchtungen-bestaetigt-9318337.html \|access-date=2026-07-03 \|website=Heise Online}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web \|last=Breyer \|first=Patrick \|date=2025-02-25 \|title=Chat control: EU Ombudsman criticises revolving door between Europol and chat control tech lobbyist Thorn \|url=https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/chat-control-eu-ombudsman-criticises-revolving-door-between-europol-and-chat-control-tech-lobbyist-thorn/ \|access-date=2026-07-03 \|website=Patrick Breyer - Digitaler Freiheitskämpfer}}</ref>
	\|Anti-Encryption, Surveillance		\|Anti-Encryption, Surveillance
	\|Rejected by EU parlament on multiple occasions, but keeps getting re-introduced		\|Rejected by EU parlament on multiple occasions, but keeps getting re-introduced

MrTuttle: /* List of Legislation */ Substantiate Thorn lobby entanglement claims for EU Chat Control with sources

2026-07-03T18:58:53Z

List of Legislation: Substantiate Thorn lobby entanglement claims for EU Chat Control with sources

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:58, 3 July 2026
Line 527:		Line 527:
	\|Chat Control		\|Chat Control
	\|EU		\|EU
	\|Messengers have to have a built-in backdoor to allow scanning of messages. If suspicious content is found (likely by means of a proprietary software), the content is sent to an institution which is not under court oversight. Introduced based on lobbying by a U.S. non-profit called Thorn ~~which makes~~ such scanning software. <ref>{{Cite web \|title=~~Fight~~ Chat Control \|url=https://~~fightchatcontrol~~.eu/ \|access-date=2026-06-02 \|website=~~Fight Chat Control~~}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web \|title=~~Stop~~ Chat ~~Control~~ \|url=https://~~stopchatcontrol~~.eu/}}</ref>		\|Messengers have to have a built-in backdoor to allow scanning of messages. If suspicious content is found (likely by means of a proprietary software), the content is sent to an institution which is not under court oversight.<ref>{{Cite web \|title=Fight Chat Control \|url=https://fightchatcontrol.eu/ \|access-date=2026-06-02 \|website=Fight Chat Control}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web \|title=Stop Chat Control \|url=https://stopchatcontrol.eu/}}</ref> Introduced based on lobbying by a U.S. non-profit called Thorn, a vendor of such scanning software. <ref>{{Cite web \|last=Krempl \|first=Stefan \|date=2023-08-27 \|title=Lobbygeflecht bei Chatkontrolle: "Schlimmste Befürchtungen bestätigt" (Lobby entanglements around Chat Control: "Worst Suspicions Sonfirmed") \|url=https://www.heise.de/news/Lobbygeflecht-bei-Chatkontrolle-Schlimmste-Befuerchtungen-bestaetigt-9318337.html \|access-date=2026-07-03 \|website=Heise Online}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web \|last=Breyer \|first=Patrick \|date=2025-02-25 \|title=Chat control: EU Ombudsman criticises revolving door between Europol and chat control tech lobbyist Thorn \|url=https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/chat-control-eu-ombudsman-criticises-revolving-door-between-europol-and-chat-control-tech-lobbyist-thorn/ \|access-date=2026-07-03 \|website=Patrick Breyer - Digitaler Freiheitskämpfer}}</ref>
	\|Anti-Encryption, Surveillance		\|Anti-Encryption, Surveillance
	\|Rejected by EU parlament on multiple occasions, but keeps getting re-introduced		\|Rejected by EU parlament on multiple occasions, but keeps getting re-introduced

MrTuttle: /* List of Legislation */ Add Chat Control (EU)

2026-07-03T18:52:10Z

List of Legislation: Add Chat Control (EU)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:52, 3 July 2026
Line 524:		Line 524:
	\|ID verification		\|ID verification
	\|Introduced effective July 1st 2017		\|Introduced effective July 1st 2017
			\|-
			\|Chat Control
			\|EU
			\|Messengers have to have a built-in backdoor to allow scanning of messages. If suspicious content is found (likely by means of a proprietary software), the content is sent to an institution which is not under court oversight. Introduced based on lobbying by a U.S. non-profit called Thorn which makes such scanning software. <ref>{{Cite web \|title=Fight Chat Control \|url=https://fightchatcontrol.eu/ \|access-date=2026-06-02 \|website=Fight Chat Control}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web \|title=Stop Chat Control \|url=https://stopchatcontrol.eu/}}</ref>
			\|Anti-Encryption, Surveillance
			\|Rejected by EU parlament on multiple occasions, but keeps getting re-introduced
	\|}		\|}

MrTuttle: /* List of Legislation */ Add German anti-terror legislation forcing ID verification to activate SIM cards

2026-07-02T13:10:45Z

List of Legislation: Add German anti-terror legislation forcing ID verification to activate SIM cards

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:10, 2 July 2026
Line 518:		Line 518:
	\|Age Verification/Censorship		\|Age Verification/Censorship
	\|Introduced		\|Introduced
			\|-
			\|Anti-Terror-Paket (Anti terrorism package)
			\|Germany
			\|Telcos are required to verify identity of the buyer when selling and activating SIM cards. Reason given is fight against terrorism. Introduced by a coalition of christian conservative parties (CDU/CSU) and social democrats (SPD).<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Milosevic \|first=Josefine \|date=2017-06-30 \|title=Prepaid-Karten: Ausweispflicht ab dem 1. Juli \|url=https://www.connect.de/ratgeber/prepaid-karten-ausweispflicht-identifizierung-1-juli-2017-3197406.html \|access-date=2026-07-02 \|website=Connect}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web \|last=Briegleb \|first=Volker \|date=2016-06-01 \|title=Ausweispflicht bei Prepaid-SIMs: Kabinett bringt Anti-Terror-Paket auf den Weg \|url=https://www.heise.de/news/Ausweispflicht-bei-Prepaid-SIMs-Kabinett-bringt-Anti-Terror-Paket-auf-den-Weg-3224166.html \|access-date=2026-07-02 \|website=Heise Online}}</ref>
			\|ID verification
			\|Introduced effective July 1st 2017
	\|}		\|}

H0l0 at 18:18, 1 July 2026

2026-07-01T18:18:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:18, 1 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Incomplete\|issue 1=needs general improvement of quality and quantity of information}}		{{Incomplete\|issue 1=needs general improvement of quality and quantity of information}}

	[[Anti-privacy legislation]] simply put is a legislation that may be created with malicious intent or not that invoke ones right to privacy. ~~In the last decade~~, governments across the world have introduced various pieces of such legislation, which has caused damage to the privacy consumers have with their technology.		[[Anti-privacy legislation]] simply put is a legislation that may be created with malicious intent or not that invoke ones right to privacy. More recently, governments across the world have introduced various pieces of such legislation, which has caused damage to the privacy consumers have with their technology.

	==How it works==		==How it works==
	The legislative ~~processes~~ might vary from country or region, but the US legislative process is as follows:<ref name=":0">{{Cite web \|date=23 Feb 2026 \|title=The Legislative Process \|url=https://www.house.gov/the-house-explained/the-legislative-process \|url-status=live \|archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20260119083226/https://www.house.gov/the-house-explained/the-legislative-process \|archive-date=19 Jan 2026 \|access-date=23 Feb 2026 \|website=[[United States House of Representatives]]}}</ref>		The legislative process might vary from country or region, but the US legislative process is as follows:<ref name=":0">{{Cite web \|date=23 Feb 2026 \|title=The Legislative Process \|url=https://www.house.gov/the-house-explained/the-legislative-process \|url-status=live \|archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20260119083226/https://www.house.gov/the-house-explained/the-legislative-process \|archive-date=19 Jan 2026 \|access-date=23 Feb 2026 \|website=[[United States House of Representatives]]}}</ref>

	#A representative '''needs to sponsor a bill'''		#A representative '''needs to sponsor a bill'''
Line 15:		Line 15:
	Now that such anti-privacy legislation has been approved, it can be enforced by federal agencies via penalties.		Now that such anti-privacy legislation has been approved, it can be enforced by federal agencies via penalties.

	Anti-privacy ~~legislations~~ enforce companies, products or services to collect user's sensitive data in order to comply with purposes that are usually tagged as "safety".		Anti-privacy legislation enforce companies, products or services to collect user's sensitive data in order to comply with purposes that are usually tagged as "safety".

	==Why it is a problem==		==Why it is a problem==
	Anti-privacy ~~legislations are~~ frequently incompatible with already established ~~legislations~~ or constitutions from countries or regions, that have even been enforced no matter if these ~~legislations~~ are violating the country/region constitution or ~~legislations~~ protecting online privacy, anonymity or freedom of speech.		Anti-privacy legislation is frequently incompatible with already established legislation or constitutions from countries or regions, that have even been enforced no matter if these legislation are violating the country/region's constitution or legislation protecting online privacy, anonymity or freedom of speech.

	===Anti-privacy legislation is a direct infringement of the First and Fourth Amendments found in the Bill of Rights (U.S.A.)===		===Anti-privacy legislation is a direct infringement of the First and Fourth Amendments found in the Bill of Rights (U.S.A.)===
Line 55:		Line 55:
	\|U.S		\|U.S
	\|Placeholder: This law strengthened a policing type agency's ability to surveil & investigate things related to devices, along with other things.(Found under Title II)		\|Placeholder: This law strengthened a policing type agency's ability to surveil & investigate things related to devices, along with other things.(Found under Title II)
	\|Enhanced Technological & Real Life Surveillance		\|Enhanced Technological & Real Life Surveillance
	\|Approved (Signed on Oct 26, 2001)		\|Approved (Signed on Oct 26, 2001)
	\|-		\|-
Line 90:		Line 90:
	\|[https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/1207 S.1207 - Earn It Act]		\|[https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/1207 S.1207 - Earn It Act]
	\|U.S		\|U.S
	\|The Earn It Act quote "revises the federal framework governing the prevention of online sexual exploitation of children" by limiting the "liability protections of interactive computer service providers(Encryption)", essentially making the Earn it Act an "anti-encryption", ~~which is (~~for the most part) necessary to protect ones own important documents & maintain a level of privacy in the digital age.		\|The Earn It Act quote "revises the federal framework governing the prevention of online sexual exploitation of children" by limiting the "liability protections of interactive computer service providers(Encryption)", essentially making the Earn it Act an "anti-encryption" bill. (Which is, for the most part, necessary to protect ones own important documents & maintain a level of privacy in the digital age)
	\|Anti-Encryption		\|Anti-Encryption
	\|Introduced		\|Introduced
Line 526:		Line 526:
	#'''Contact local legislators & representatives;''' If enough people oppose a proposed bill, local legislators may delay the bill or back off on their decision entirely. If enough citizens instead urge a representative to vote against a bill, said representatives could potentially follow up on the citizen's behalf.{{Citation needed\|date=1 Mar 2026}}		#'''Contact local legislators & representatives;''' If enough people oppose a proposed bill, local legislators may delay the bill or back off on their decision entirely. If enough citizens instead urge a representative to vote against a bill, said representatives could potentially follow up on the citizen's behalf.{{Citation needed\|date=1 Mar 2026}}
	#'''Sign Petitions'''; Signing petitions is another way to the message across to both legislators & other people alike.{{Citation needed\|date=1 Mar 2026}}		#'''Sign Petitions'''; Signing petitions is another way to the message across to both legislators & other people alike.{{Citation needed\|date=1 Mar 2026}}
	#'''Support Pro Consumer/Privacy Bills'''; Supporting bills/would-be laws that protect consumer privacy & ownership helps circumvent future bills that ~~aims~~ for the opposite affect.{{Citation needed\|date=1 Mar 2026}}		#'''Support Pro Consumer/Privacy Bills'''; Supporting bills/would-be laws that protect consumer privacy & ownership helps to circumvent future bills that aim for the opposite affect.{{Citation needed\|date=1 Mar 2026}}

	===Tools & Resources===		===Tools & Resources===

H0l0: Patriot Act placeholder

2026-07-01T11:50:04Z

Patriot Act placeholder

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:50, 1 July 2026
Line 51:		Line 51:
	\|Age Verification		\|Age Verification
	\|Approved (Signed on Oct 26, 2023, Active since Jul 25 2025)		\|Approved (Signed on Oct 26, 2023, Active since Jul 25 2025)
			\|-
			\|[https://www.congress.gov/107/plaws/publ56/PLAW-107publ56.pdf USA PATRIOT ACT]
			\|U.S
			\|Placeholder: This law strengthened a policing type agency's ability to surveil & investigate things related to devices, along with other things.(Found under Title II)
			\|Enhanced Technological & Real Life Surveillance
			\|Approved (Signed on Oct 26, 2001)
	\|-		\|-
	\|[https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2025/253 Florida HB 253]		\|[https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2025/253 Florida HB 253]

H0l0: Added a placeholder section for "The KIDS Act"

2026-07-01T11:37:15Z

Added a placeholder section for "The KIDS Act"

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:37, 1 July 2026
Line 39:		Line 39:
	!Method of Eroding Privacy		!Method of Eroding Privacy
	!Status		!Status
			\|-
			\|[https://d1dth6e84htgma.cloudfront.net/H7757_SUS_xml_4b1ac8f00f.pdf The KIDS Act]
			\|U.S
			\|[TBA]
			\|Identity disclosure/Censorship/Anti-Encryption
			\|Passed House
	\|-		\|-
	\|[[UK Online Safety Act]]		\|[[UK Online Safety Act]]

ClippyWantsToHelp at 05:14, 13 June 2026

2026-06-13T05:14:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:14, 13 June 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Incomplete\|issue 1=needs general improvement of quality and quantity of information}}		{{Incomplete\|issue 1=needs general improvement of quality and quantity of information}}

	[[Anti-privacy legislation]] simply put is legislation that may be created with malicious intent or not that invoke ones right to privacy. In the last decade, governments across the world have introduced various pieces of such legislation, which has caused damage to the privacy consumers have with their technology.		[[Anti-privacy legislation]] simply put is a legislation that may be created with malicious intent or not that invoke ones right to privacy. In the last decade, governments across the world have introduced various pieces of such legislation, which has caused damage to the privacy consumers have with their technology.

	==How it works==		==How it works==
	The US legislative process is as follows:<ref name=":0">{{Cite web \|date=23 Feb 2026 \|title=The Legislative Process \|url=https://www.house.gov/the-house-explained/the-legislative-process \|url-status=live \|archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20260119083226/https://www.house.gov/the-house-explained/the-legislative-process \|archive-date=19 Jan 2026 \|access-date=23 Feb 2026 \|website=[[United States House of Representatives]]}}</ref>		The legislative processes might vary from country or region, but the US legislative process is as follows:<ref name=":0">{{Cite web \|date=23 Feb 2026 \|title=The Legislative Process \|url=https://www.house.gov/the-house-explained/the-legislative-process \|url-status=live \|archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20260119083226/https://www.house.gov/the-house-explained/the-legislative-process \|archive-date=19 Jan 2026 \|access-date=23 Feb 2026 \|website=[[United States House of Representatives]]}}</ref>

	#A representative '''needs to sponsor a bill'''		#A representative '''needs to sponsor a bill'''
Line 14:		Line 14:

	Now that such anti-privacy legislation has been approved, it can be enforced by federal agencies via penalties.		Now that such anti-privacy legislation has been approved, it can be enforced by federal agencies via penalties.

			Anti-privacy legislations enforce companies, products or services to collect user's sensitive data in order to comply with purposes that are usually tagged as "safety".

	==Why it is a problem==		==Why it is a problem==
			Anti-privacy legislations are frequently incompatible with already established legislations or constitutions from countries or regions, that have even been enforced no matter if these legislations are violating the country/region constitution or legislations protecting online privacy, anonymity or freedom of speech.

	===Anti-privacy legislation is a direct infringement of the First and Fourth Amendments found in the Bill of Rights (U.S.A.)===		===Anti-privacy legislation is a direct infringement of the First and Fourth Amendments found in the Bill of Rights (U.S.A.)===

Sojourna: /* Anti-privacy legislation is a direct infringement of the First and Fourth Amendments found in the Bill of Rights (U.S.A.) */

2026-06-13T04:46:58Z

Anti-privacy legislation is a direct infringement of the First and Fourth Amendments found in the Bill of Rights (U.S.A.)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:46, 13 June 2026
Line 24:		Line 24:

	*The Fourth amendment reads as follows:		*The Fourth amendment reads as follows:
	<blockquote>The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against '''unreasonable searches and seizures''', shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=28 Feb 2026 \|title=U.S Constitution - Fourth Amendment \|url=https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-4/ \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260224165919/https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-4/ \|archive-date=2026-02-24 \|access-date=28 Feb 2026 \|website=Constitution Annotated}}</ref></blockquote>'''Anti-privacy legislation''' infringes on a citizen's right to avoid "'''unreasonable searches and seizures'''" since It may require/force citizens to show proof of age('''selfies, ~~id's~~, credit cards''') without real probable cause ~~and since~~ It may also force said citizen to use less secure services that allow federal agencies to gain higher access to said services and retrieve to whatever data is "needed".{{Citation needed\|date=28 Feb 2026}}		<blockquote>The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against '''unreasonable searches and seizures''', shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=28 Feb 2026 \|title=U.S Constitution - Fourth Amendment \|url=https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-4/ \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260224165919/https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-4/ \|archive-date=2026-02-24 \|access-date=28 Feb 2026 \|website=Constitution Annotated}}</ref></blockquote>'''Anti-privacy legislation''' infringes on a citizen's right to avoid "'''unreasonable searches and seizures'''" since it may require/force citizens to show proof of age ('''selfies, IDs, credit cards''') without real probable cause. It may also force said citizen to use less secure services that allow federal agencies to gain higher access to said services and retrieve whatever data is "needed".{{Citation needed\|date=28 Feb 2026}}

	*'''Anti-privacy legislation''' can also build the framework and foundation for other and more extreme anti-privacy measures, and such anti-privacy measures can lead to the slow development of a '''''surveillance state.'''''<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Sherwinter \|first=Daniel \|date=28 Feb 2026 \|title=Surveillance's Slippery Slope; Using Encryption to Recapture Privacy Rights \|url=http://www.jthtl.org/content/articles/V5I2/JTHTLv5i2_Sherwinter.PDF \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240730145810/http://jthtl.org/content/articles/V5I2/JTHTLv5i2_Sherwinter.PDF \|archive-date=2024-07-30 \|access-date=28 Feb 2026 \|website=Journal on Telecommunications and High Technology Law}}</ref>		*'''Anti-privacy legislation''' can also build the framework and foundation for other and more extreme anti-privacy measures, and such anti-privacy measures can lead to the slow development of a '''''surveillance state.'''''<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Sherwinter \|first=Daniel \|date=28 Feb 2026 \|title=Surveillance's Slippery Slope; Using Encryption to Recapture Privacy Rights \|url=http://www.jthtl.org/content/articles/V5I2/JTHTLv5i2_Sherwinter.PDF \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240730145810/http://jthtl.org/content/articles/V5I2/JTHTLv5i2_Sherwinter.PDF \|archive-date=2024-07-30 \|access-date=28 Feb 2026 \|website=Journal on Telecommunications and High Technology Law}}</ref>