Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderators' noticeboard - Revision history

Sojourna: /* Suggestion */

2026-04-16T23:25:17Z

Suggestion

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:25, 16 April 2026
Line 146:		Line 146:

	:Agree, we don't really have a specific date standard here [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:38, 11 April 2026 (UTC)		:Agree, we don't really have a specific date standard here [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:38, 11 April 2026 (UTC)


			:I have been using the DMY format since the majority of the world generally uses that. The hope for the wiki is to be an international source for consumers around the world (not just Americans), and I believe DMY to be in line with that goal. I further believe it would be better to have a consistent experience, which is why I have used the DMY format even for American companies and incidents. (Though clearly Rossmann disagreed with that, as he recently "corrected" the dates on an Amazon article from an older edit of mine.)

			:As for the citations, I abbreviate the months because early on using more than three characters for the month resulted in the citation template being unhappy. It appears to have since been fixed, but old habits die hard. Not sure why the wiki template data outputs strictly numbers and that's a topic that will eventually have to be decided on in conjunction with this.

			:Apologies for not speaking up sooner; I wanted mull over the matter first. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 23:24, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

	==JS ToneWarning appeal==		==JS ToneWarning appeal==

Sojourna: /* Appeal request for YNAB article */ Reply

2026-04-16T22:36:06Z

Appeal request for YNAB article: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:36, 16 April 2026
Line 155:		Line 155:
	:{{Done}} [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 06:59, 13 April 2026 (UTC)		:{{Done}} [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 06:59, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

	== Appeal request for YNAB article ==		==Appeal request for YNAB article==

	Hey CRW!		Hey CRW!
Line 164:		Line 164:

	The one thing I think could be better is providing the actual email sent by YNAB as its own file as a better reference, but because I am no longer personally a user of YNAB, I don't have a copy to provide, myself. I reached out to some users from the subreddit threads linked within the article to ask for some anonymized copy if at all possible, and if I get something back, I can provide that then (or, if someone else has their own copy, all the power to them to contribute it). Failing this, though, I hope that the links to the related discussion about the email's existence meets the standard of verifiability. [[User:Jamesonismad\|Jameson Ismad]] ([[User talk:Jamesonismad\|talk]]) 05:16, 16 April 2026 (UTC)		The one thing I think could be better is providing the actual email sent by YNAB as its own file as a better reference, but because I am no longer personally a user of YNAB, I don't have a copy to provide, myself. I reached out to some users from the subreddit threads linked within the article to ask for some anonymized copy if at all possible, and if I get something back, I can provide that then (or, if someone else has their own copy, all the power to them to contribute it). Failing this, though, I hope that the links to the related discussion about the email's existence meets the standard of verifiability. [[User:Jamesonismad\|Jameson Ismad]] ([[User talk:Jamesonismad\|talk]]) 05:16, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

			:{{Done}} — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 22:36, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Jamesonismad: /* Appeal request for YNAB article */

2026-04-16T05:18:47Z

Appeal request for YNAB article

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:18, 16 April 2026
Line 159:		Line 159:
	Hey CRW!		Hey CRW!

	Today, after learning that YouNeedABudget had added forced arbitration to their ToS, I contributed my first original wiki article. I'd not completed each section, so it was naturally marked as a stub, but '''I believe I've satisfied the requirements for each required section, now, and that it is outside stub territory.'''		Today, after learning that YouNeedABudget had added forced arbitration to their ToS, I contributed [[You Need A Budget (YNAB)\|my first original wiki article]]. I'd not completed each section, so it was naturally marked as a stub, but '''I believe I've satisfied the requirements for each required section, now, and that it is outside stub territory.'''

	I tried to provide as many references as I could, while keeping things as relevant as I could, but as I said, this is my first article, so please let me know if there's anything else I can contribute to improve the article in any way.		I tried to provide as many references as I could, while keeping things as relevant as I could, but as I said, this is my first article, so please let me know if there's anything else I can contribute to improve the article in any way.

	The one thing I think could be better is providing the actual email sent by YNAB as its own file as a better reference, but because I am no longer personally a user of YNAB, I don't have a copy to provide, myself. I reached out to some users from the subreddit threads linked within the article to ask for some anonymized copy if at all possible, and if I get something back, I can provide that then (or, if someone else has their own copy, all the power to them to contribute it). Failing this, though, I hope that the links to the related discussion about the email's existence meets the standard of verifiability. [[User:Jamesonismad\|Jameson Ismad]] ([[User talk:Jamesonismad\|talk]]) 05:16, 16 April 2026 (UTC)		The one thing I think could be better is providing the actual email sent by YNAB as its own file as a better reference, but because I am no longer personally a user of YNAB, I don't have a copy to provide, myself. I reached out to some users from the subreddit threads linked within the article to ask for some anonymized copy if at all possible, and if I get something back, I can provide that then (or, if someone else has their own copy, all the power to them to contribute it). Failing this, though, I hope that the links to the related discussion about the email's existence meets the standard of verifiability. [[User:Jamesonismad\|Jameson Ismad]] ([[User talk:Jamesonismad\|talk]]) 05:16, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Jamesonismad: /* Appeal request for YNAB article */ new section

2026-04-16T05:16:38Z

Appeal request for YNAB article: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:16, 16 April 2026
Line 154:		Line 154:

	:{{Done}} [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 06:59, 13 April 2026 (UTC)		:{{Done}} [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 06:59, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

			== Appeal request for YNAB article ==

			Hey CRW!

			Today, after learning that YouNeedABudget had added forced arbitration to their ToS, I contributed my first original wiki article. I'd not completed each section, so it was naturally marked as a stub, but '''I believe I've satisfied the requirements for each required section, now, and that it is outside stub territory.'''

			I tried to provide as many references as I could, while keeping things as relevant as I could, but as I said, this is my first article, so please let me know if there's anything else I can contribute to improve the article in any way.

			The one thing I think could be better is providing the actual email sent by YNAB as its own file as a better reference, but because I am no longer personally a user of YNAB, I don't have a copy to provide, myself. I reached out to some users from the subreddit threads linked within the article to ask for some anonymized copy if at all possible, and if I get something back, I can provide that then (or, if someone else has their own copy, all the power to them to contribute it). Failing this, though, I hope that the links to the related discussion about the email's existence meets the standard of verifiability. [[User:Jamesonismad\|Jameson Ismad]] ([[User talk:Jamesonismad\|talk]]) 05:16, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Rudxain: clarify what is "JS"

2026-04-14T08:54:51Z

clarify what is "JS"

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:54, 14 April 2026
Line 149:		Line 149:
	==JS ToneWarning appeal==		==JS ToneWarning appeal==

	With the most recent edits (from other people, and myself) I think that notice can be finally removed. <code>Cleanup</code> should stay, as it's not done.		([[JavaScript\|this article]]) With the most recent edits (from other people, and myself) I think that notice can be finally removed. <code>Cleanup</code> should stay, as it's not done.

	I could remove the notice myself, but I'm asking here, just-in-case [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 06:21, 13 April 2026 (UTC)		I could remove the notice myself, but I'm asking here, just-in-case [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 06:21, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

	:{{Done}} [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 06:59, 13 April 2026 (UTC)		:{{Done}} [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 06:59, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

AnotherConsumerRightsPerson: /* JS ToneWarning appeal */ Reply

2026-04-13T06:59:08Z

JS ToneWarning appeal: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:59, 13 April 2026
Line 147:		Line 147:
	:Agree, we don't really have a specific date standard here [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:38, 11 April 2026 (UTC)		:Agree, we don't really have a specific date standard here [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:38, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

	== JS ToneWarning appeal ==		==JS ToneWarning appeal==

	With the most recent edits (from other people, and myself) I think that notice can be finally removed. <code>Cleanup</code> should stay, as it's not done.		With the most recent edits (from other people, and myself) I think that notice can be finally removed. <code>Cleanup</code> should stay, as it's not done.

	I could remove the notice myself, but I'm asking here, just-in-case [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 06:21, 13 April 2026 (UTC)		I could remove the notice myself, but I'm asking here, just-in-case [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 06:21, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

			:{{Done}} [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 06:59, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Rudxain: /* JS ToneWarning appeal */ new section

2026-04-13T06:21:54Z

JS ToneWarning appeal: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:21, 13 April 2026
Line 146:		Line 146:

	:Agree, we don't really have a specific date standard here [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:38, 11 April 2026 (UTC)		:Agree, we don't really have a specific date standard here [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:38, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

			== JS ToneWarning appeal ==

			With the most recent edits (from other people, and myself) I think that notice can be finally removed. <code>Cleanup</code> should stay, as it's not done.

			I could remove the notice myself, but I'm asking here, just-in-case [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 06:21, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

AnotherConsumerRightsPerson: /* Suggestion */ Reply

2026-04-11T05:38:30Z

Suggestion: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:38, 11 April 2026
Line 135:		Line 135:
	::::@[[User:JakeL\|JakeL]] pinging again [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 11:04, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		::::@[[User:JakeL\|JakeL]] pinging again [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 11:04, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

	== Suggestion ==		==Suggestion==

	I feel we could be more clearer when it come to our date standards on the wiki, as right now I feel its lacking in clarity and causes confusion for newcomers on what the actual date format is most commonly accepted and preferred (as of right now being something like a date format of 20 Jan 2004 <s>if that makes sense</s>). Currently, when going onto the citation tab to add a source, it reads ''"Example: Format as YYYY-MM-DD (2020-12-30) or DD Mon YYYY (30 Dec 2025)".''		I feel we could be more clearer when it come to our date standards on the wiki, as right now I feel its lacking in clarity and causes confusion for newcomers on what the actual date format is most commonly accepted and preferred (as of right now being something like a date format of 20 Jan 2004 <s>if that makes sense</s>). Currently, when going onto the citation tab to add a source, it reads ''"Example: Format as YYYY-MM-DD (2020-12-30) or DD Mon YYYY (30 Dec 2025)".''
Line 144:		Line 144:

	I don't mean to come off in a bad way where it's disrespectful, I meant to only state my opinion on the matter. [[User:SquidthePlummer\|SquidthePlummer]] ([[User talk:SquidthePlummer\|talk]]) 03:06, 11 April 2026 (UTC)		I don't mean to come off in a bad way where it's disrespectful, I meant to only state my opinion on the matter. [[User:SquidthePlummer\|SquidthePlummer]] ([[User talk:SquidthePlummer\|talk]]) 03:06, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

			:Agree, we don't really have a specific date standard here [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:38, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

SquidthePlummer: /* Suggestion */ new section

2026-04-11T03:06:14Z

Suggestion: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:06, 11 April 2026
Line 134:		Line 134:
	:::I'm going to throw in a curveball. logged in and I still got the issue. [[User:SinexTitan\|SinexTitan]] ([[User talk:SinexTitan\|talk]]) 08:52, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		:::I'm going to throw in a curveball. logged in and I still got the issue. [[User:SinexTitan\|SinexTitan]] ([[User talk:SinexTitan\|talk]]) 08:52, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
	::::@[[User:JakeL\|JakeL]] pinging again [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 11:04, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		::::@[[User:JakeL\|JakeL]] pinging again [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 11:04, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

			== Suggestion ==

			I feel we could be more clearer when it come to our date standards on the wiki, as right now I feel its lacking in clarity and causes confusion for newcomers on what the actual date format is most commonly accepted and preferred (as of right now being something like a date format of 20 Jan 2004 <s>if that makes sense</s>). Currently, when going onto the citation tab to add a source, it reads ''"Example: Format as YYYY-MM-DD (2020-12-30) or DD Mon YYYY (30 Dec 2025)".''

			Additionally, I also think the product section ''(referring to the This is a list of the company's product lines '''with articles on this wiki'''. [[Example product line one]] (release date): Short summary of the product's incidents.)'' could also be more specified and informative on what users are supposed to fill out, along with specifying what to do when there's no incidents relating to any of their product, as right now it's kinda up to the users to determine what it means.

			I also want to ask if you can add more sections to the parent company on the CompanyCargo template(being adding one company that's own by several other companies instead of one <s>as of current</s>) as I'm currently working on '''[[Denny's]]''' article and <sub><s>as far as I know</s></sub> there are 3 private companies that own Denny's as of the moment.

			I don't mean to come off in a bad way where it's disrespectful, I meant to only state my opinion on the matter. [[User:SquidthePlummer\|SquidthePlummer]] ([[User talk:SquidthePlummer\|talk]]) 03:06, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

AnotherConsumerRightsPerson: /* Featured articles on main page have light grey title on White background .. even on dark mode */ Reply

2026-04-10T11:04:28Z

Featured articles on main page have light grey title on White background .. even on dark mode: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:04, 10 April 2026
Line 133:		Line 133:
	:::@[[User:JakeL\|JakeL]] this was an issue that I had before that I asked om your talkpage to fix, now it's happening again? [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:26, 6 April 2026 (UTC)		:::@[[User:JakeL\|JakeL]] this was an issue that I had before that I asked om your talkpage to fix, now it's happening again? [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:26, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
	:::I'm going to throw in a curveball. logged in and I still got the issue. [[User:SinexTitan\|SinexTitan]] ([[User talk:SinexTitan\|talk]]) 08:52, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		:::I'm going to throw in a curveball. logged in and I still got the issue. [[User:SinexTitan\|SinexTitan]] ([[User talk:SinexTitan\|talk]]) 08:52, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
			::::@[[User:JakeL\|JakeL]] pinging again [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 11:04, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:04, 10 April 2026
Line 133:		Line 133:
	:::@[[User:JakeL\|JakeL]] this was an issue that I had before that I asked om your talkpage to fix, now it's happening again? [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:26, 6 April 2026 (UTC)		:::@[[User:JakeL\|JakeL]] this was an issue that I had before that I asked om your talkpage to fix, now it's happening again? [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:26, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
	:::I'm going to throw in a curveball. logged in and I still got the issue. [[User:SinexTitan\|SinexTitan]] ([[User talk:SinexTitan\|talk]]) 08:52, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		:::I'm going to throw in a curveball. logged in and I still got the issue. [[User:SinexTitan\|SinexTitan]] ([[User talk:SinexTitan\|talk]]) 08:52, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
			::::@[[User:JakeL\|JakeL]] pinging again [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 11:04, 10 April 2026 (UTC)