Malicious compliance - Revision history

Tempo123: /* References */ Archive

2026-04-05T19:41:57Z

References: Archive

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:41, 5 April 2026
Line 10:		Line 10:
	*[[Apple]]: After being required by the EU to open up their devices to apps sold outside the [[Apple App Store]], the company created a multitude of hurdles, fees and complications to make it as difficult as possible for developers to actually do this, including a requirement that every independently distributed app still be approved by Apple and fees be paid by the developer.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Mendes \|first=Marcus \|date=2025-05-27 \|title=EU ruling: Apple’s App Store still in violation of DMA, 30 days to comply \|url=https://9to5mac.com/2025/05/27/apple-dma-30-days-deadline/ \|access-date=2025-08-29 \|website=9to5Mac \|archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251218064032/https://9to5mac.com/2025/05/27/apple-dma-30-days-deadline/ \|archive-date=18 Dec 2025}}</ref><ref>https://dev.to/1_king_0b1e1f8bfe6d1/how-ios-sideloading-actually-works-in-2025-dev-certs-altstore-and-the-eu-exception-1m2h ([http://web.archive.org/web/20250527082823/https://dev.to/1_king_0b1e1f8bfe6d1/how-ios-sideloading-actually-works-in-2025-dev-certs-altstore-and-the-eu-exception-1m2h Archived])</ref>		*[[Apple]]: After being required by the EU to open up their devices to apps sold outside the [[Apple App Store]], the company created a multitude of hurdles, fees and complications to make it as difficult as possible for developers to actually do this, including a requirement that every independently distributed app still be approved by Apple and fees be paid by the developer.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Mendes \|first=Marcus \|date=2025-05-27 \|title=EU ruling: Apple’s App Store still in violation of DMA, 30 days to comply \|url=https://9to5mac.com/2025/05/27/apple-dma-30-days-deadline/ \|access-date=2025-08-29 \|website=9to5Mac \|archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251218064032/https://9to5mac.com/2025/05/27/apple-dma-30-days-deadline/ \|archive-date=18 Dec 2025}}</ref><ref>https://dev.to/1_king_0b1e1f8bfe6d1/how-ios-sideloading-actually-works-in-2025-dev-certs-altstore-and-the-eu-exception-1m2h ([http://web.archive.org/web/20250527082823/https://dev.to/1_king_0b1e1f8bfe6d1/how-ios-sideloading-actually-works-in-2025-dev-certs-altstore-and-the-eu-exception-1m2h Archived])</ref>
	*[[Apple]]: After the EU mandated USB-C as a charging port for all phones, Apple explored various ways to still require cable and accessory manufacturers to go through their costly Made for iPhone certification programmes and require consumers to still buy additional cables and accessories.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Roberts \|first=Paul \|date=2023-09-12 \|title=Will Apple Use a Loophole in EU’s USB-C Requirement? \|url=https://de.ifixit.com/News/81197/will-apple-use-a-loophole-in-eus-usb-c-requirement \|access-date=2025-08-29 \|website=iFixit \|archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251010001231/https://de.ifixit.com/News/81197/will-apple-use-a-loophole-in-eus-usb-c-requirement \|archive-date=10 Oct 2025}}</ref>		*[[Apple]]: After the EU mandated USB-C as a charging port for all phones, Apple explored various ways to still require cable and accessory manufacturers to go through their costly Made for iPhone certification programmes and require consumers to still buy additional cables and accessories.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Roberts \|first=Paul \|date=2023-09-12 \|title=Will Apple Use a Loophole in EU’s USB-C Requirement? \|url=https://de.ifixit.com/News/81197/will-apple-use-a-loophole-in-eus-usb-c-requirement \|access-date=2025-08-29 \|website=iFixit \|archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251010001231/https://de.ifixit.com/News/81197/will-apple-use-a-loophole-in-eus-usb-c-requirement \|archive-date=10 Oct 2025}}</ref>
	*Other examples of malicious compliance are related to the willingness of companies to follow [[right to repair]] laws. Most notably of these companies are [[Apple]], [[Samsung]], and [[John Deere]].<ref> https://www.repair.org/blog/2024/1/26/malicious-compliance-with-right-to-repair-laws</ref>		*Other examples of malicious compliance are related to the willingness of companies to follow [[right to repair]] laws. Most notably of these companies are [[Apple]], [[Samsung]], and [[John Deere]].<ref> https://www.repair.org/blog/2024/1/26/malicious-compliance-with-right-to-repair-laws ([https://web.archive.org/web/20251205232819/https://www.repair.org/blog/2024/1/26/malicious-compliance-with-right-to-repair-laws Archived])</ref>

	==References==		==References==

Rudxain: categories: Theme, Anti-consumer. link "Forced account"

2026-03-16T09:16:19Z

categories: Theme, Anti-consumer. link "Forced account"

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:16, 16 March 2026
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Applied to consumer rights, this means a manufacturer or brand complies with regulations in word, but not in spirit, thus rendering the regulation ineffective.		Applied to consumer rights, this means a manufacturer or brand complies with regulations in word, but not in spirit, thus rendering the regulation ineffective.

	Some common practices include making it intentionally difficult for a consumer to exercise their rights through use of [[Dark pattern\|dark patterns]], obstacles such requiring communication by letter, imposing fees, requiring registration and many more.		Some common practices include making it intentionally difficult for a consumer to exercise their rights through use of [[Dark pattern\|dark patterns]], obstacles such requiring communication by letter, imposing fees, [[Forced account\|requiring registration]] and many more.

	==Prominent Examples==		==Prominent Examples==
Line 15:		Line 15:
	[[Category:Common terms]]		[[Category:Common terms]]
	<references />		<references />
			[[Category:Anti-consumer practices]]
			[[Category:Theme]]

Dosjdhdjdjdhdjdjdj: /* Prominent Examples */

2026-02-26T03:13:59Z

Prominent Examples

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:13, 26 February 2026
Line 10:		Line 10:
	*[[Apple]]: After being required by the EU to open up their devices to apps sold outside the [[Apple App Store]], the company created a multitude of hurdles, fees and complications to make it as difficult as possible for developers to actually do this, including a requirement that every independently distributed app still be approved by Apple and fees be paid by the developer.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Mendes \|first=Marcus \|date=2025-05-27 \|title=EU ruling: Apple’s App Store still in violation of DMA, 30 days to comply \|url=https://9to5mac.com/2025/05/27/apple-dma-30-days-deadline/ \|access-date=2025-08-29 \|website=9to5Mac \|archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251218064032/https://9to5mac.com/2025/05/27/apple-dma-30-days-deadline/ \|archive-date=18 Dec 2025}}</ref><ref>https://dev.to/1_king_0b1e1f8bfe6d1/how-ios-sideloading-actually-works-in-2025-dev-certs-altstore-and-the-eu-exception-1m2h ([http://web.archive.org/web/20250527082823/https://dev.to/1_king_0b1e1f8bfe6d1/how-ios-sideloading-actually-works-in-2025-dev-certs-altstore-and-the-eu-exception-1m2h Archived])</ref>		*[[Apple]]: After being required by the EU to open up their devices to apps sold outside the [[Apple App Store]], the company created a multitude of hurdles, fees and complications to make it as difficult as possible for developers to actually do this, including a requirement that every independently distributed app still be approved by Apple and fees be paid by the developer.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Mendes \|first=Marcus \|date=2025-05-27 \|title=EU ruling: Apple’s App Store still in violation of DMA, 30 days to comply \|url=https://9to5mac.com/2025/05/27/apple-dma-30-days-deadline/ \|access-date=2025-08-29 \|website=9to5Mac \|archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251218064032/https://9to5mac.com/2025/05/27/apple-dma-30-days-deadline/ \|archive-date=18 Dec 2025}}</ref><ref>https://dev.to/1_king_0b1e1f8bfe6d1/how-ios-sideloading-actually-works-in-2025-dev-certs-altstore-and-the-eu-exception-1m2h ([http://web.archive.org/web/20250527082823/https://dev.to/1_king_0b1e1f8bfe6d1/how-ios-sideloading-actually-works-in-2025-dev-certs-altstore-and-the-eu-exception-1m2h Archived])</ref>
	*[[Apple]]: After the EU mandated USB-C as a charging port for all phones, Apple explored various ways to still require cable and accessory manufacturers to go through their costly Made for iPhone certification programmes and require consumers to still buy additional cables and accessories.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Roberts \|first=Paul \|date=2023-09-12 \|title=Will Apple Use a Loophole in EU’s USB-C Requirement? \|url=https://de.ifixit.com/News/81197/will-apple-use-a-loophole-in-eus-usb-c-requirement \|access-date=2025-08-29 \|website=iFixit \|archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251010001231/https://de.ifixit.com/News/81197/will-apple-use-a-loophole-in-eus-usb-c-requirement \|archive-date=10 Oct 2025}}</ref>		*[[Apple]]: After the EU mandated USB-C as a charging port for all phones, Apple explored various ways to still require cable and accessory manufacturers to go through their costly Made for iPhone certification programmes and require consumers to still buy additional cables and accessories.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Roberts \|first=Paul \|date=2023-09-12 \|title=Will Apple Use a Loophole in EU’s USB-C Requirement? \|url=https://de.ifixit.com/News/81197/will-apple-use-a-loophole-in-eus-usb-c-requirement \|access-date=2025-08-29 \|website=iFixit \|archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251010001231/https://de.ifixit.com/News/81197/will-apple-use-a-loophole-in-eus-usb-c-requirement \|archive-date=10 Oct 2025}}</ref>
			*Other examples of malicious compliance are related to the willingness of companies to follow [[right to repair]] laws. Most notably of these companies are [[Apple]], [[Samsung]], and [[John Deere]].<ref> https://www.repair.org/blog/2024/1/26/malicious-compliance-with-right-to-repair-laws</ref>

	==References==		==References==
	[[Category:Common terms]]		[[Category:Common terms]]
	<references />		<references />

Bananabot: Added archive URLs for 3 citation(s) using CRWCitationBot

2026-02-23T06:01:07Z

Added archive URLs for 3 citation(s) using CRWCitationBot

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:01, 23 February 2026
Line 8:		Line 8:
	==Prominent Examples==		==Prominent Examples==

	*[[Apple]]: After being required by the EU to open up their devices to apps sold outside the [[Apple App Store]], the company created a multitude of hurdles, fees and complications to make it as difficult as possible for developers to actually do this, including a requirement that every independently distributed app still be approved by Apple and fees be paid by the developer.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Mendes \|first=Marcus \|date=2025-05-27 \|title=EU ruling: Apple’s App Store still in violation of DMA, 30 days to comply \|url=https://9to5mac.com/2025/05/27/apple-dma-30-days-deadline/ \|access-date=2025-08-29 \|website=9to5Mac}}</ref><ref>https://dev.to/1_king_0b1e1f8bfe6d1/how-ios-sideloading-actually-works-in-2025-dev-certs-altstore-and-the-eu-exception-1m2h</ref>		*[[Apple]]: After being required by the EU to open up their devices to apps sold outside the [[Apple App Store]], the company created a multitude of hurdles, fees and complications to make it as difficult as possible for developers to actually do this, including a requirement that every independently distributed app still be approved by Apple and fees be paid by the developer.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Mendes \|first=Marcus \|date=2025-05-27 \|title=EU ruling: Apple’s App Store still in violation of DMA, 30 days to comply \|url=https://9to5mac.com/2025/05/27/apple-dma-30-days-deadline/ \|access-date=2025-08-29 \|website=9to5Mac \|archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251218064032/https://9to5mac.com/2025/05/27/apple-dma-30-days-deadline/ \|archive-date=18 Dec 2025}}</ref><ref>https://dev.to/1_king_0b1e1f8bfe6d1/how-ios-sideloading-actually-works-in-2025-dev-certs-altstore-and-the-eu-exception-1m2h ([http://web.archive.org/web/20250527082823/https://dev.to/1_king_0b1e1f8bfe6d1/how-ios-sideloading-actually-works-in-2025-dev-certs-altstore-and-the-eu-exception-1m2h Archived])</ref>
	*[[Apple]]: After the EU mandated USB-C as a charging port for all phones, Apple explored various ways to still require cable and accessory manufacturers to go through their costly Made for iPhone certification programmes and require consumers to still buy additional cables and accessories.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Roberts \|first=Paul \|date=2023-09-12 \|title=Will Apple Use a Loophole in EU’s USB-C Requirement? \|url=https://de.ifixit.com/News/81197/will-apple-use-a-loophole-in-eus-usb-c-requirement \|access-date=2025-08-29 \|website=iFixit}}</ref>		*[[Apple]]: After the EU mandated USB-C as a charging port for all phones, Apple explored various ways to still require cable and accessory manufacturers to go through their costly Made for iPhone certification programmes and require consumers to still buy additional cables and accessories.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Roberts \|first=Paul \|date=2023-09-12 \|title=Will Apple Use a Loophole in EU’s USB-C Requirement? \|url=https://de.ifixit.com/News/81197/will-apple-use-a-loophole-in-eus-usb-c-requirement \|access-date=2025-08-29 \|website=iFixit \|archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251010001231/https://de.ifixit.com/News/81197/will-apple-use-a-loophole-in-eus-usb-c-requirement \|archive-date=10 Oct 2025}}</ref>

	==References==		==References==
	[[Category:Common terms]]		[[Category:Common terms]]
	<references />		<references />

159.26.99.184: typo

2026-02-13T02:57:12Z

typo

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:57, 13 February 2026
Line 9:		Line 9:

	*[[Apple]]: After being required by the EU to open up their devices to apps sold outside the [[Apple App Store]], the company created a multitude of hurdles, fees and complications to make it as difficult as possible for developers to actually do this, including a requirement that every independently distributed app still be approved by Apple and fees be paid by the developer.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Mendes \|first=Marcus \|date=2025-05-27 \|title=EU ruling: Apple’s App Store still in violation of DMA, 30 days to comply \|url=https://9to5mac.com/2025/05/27/apple-dma-30-days-deadline/ \|access-date=2025-08-29 \|website=9to5Mac}}</ref><ref>https://dev.to/1_king_0b1e1f8bfe6d1/how-ios-sideloading-actually-works-in-2025-dev-certs-altstore-and-the-eu-exception-1m2h</ref>		*[[Apple]]: After being required by the EU to open up their devices to apps sold outside the [[Apple App Store]], the company created a multitude of hurdles, fees and complications to make it as difficult as possible for developers to actually do this, including a requirement that every independently distributed app still be approved by Apple and fees be paid by the developer.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Mendes \|first=Marcus \|date=2025-05-27 \|title=EU ruling: Apple’s App Store still in violation of DMA, 30 days to comply \|url=https://9to5mac.com/2025/05/27/apple-dma-30-days-deadline/ \|access-date=2025-08-29 \|website=9to5Mac}}</ref><ref>https://dev.to/1_king_0b1e1f8bfe6d1/how-ios-sideloading-actually-works-in-2025-dev-certs-altstore-and-the-eu-exception-1m2h</ref>
	*[[Apple]]: After the EU mandated USB-C as a charging port for all phones, Apple explored various ways to still require cable and ~~accessorty~~ manufacturers to go through their costly Made for iPhone certification programmes and require consumers to still buy additional cables and accessories.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Roberts \|first=Paul \|date=2023-09-12 \|title=Will Apple Use a Loophole in EU’s USB-C Requirement? \|url=https://de.ifixit.com/News/81197/will-apple-use-a-loophole-in-eus-usb-c-requirement \|access-date=2025-08-29 \|website=iFixit}}</ref>		*[[Apple]]: After the EU mandated USB-C as a charging port for all phones, Apple explored various ways to still require cable and accessory manufacturers to go through their costly Made for iPhone certification programmes and require consumers to still buy additional cables and accessories.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Roberts \|first=Paul \|date=2023-09-12 \|title=Will Apple Use a Loophole in EU’s USB-C Requirement? \|url=https://de.ifixit.com/News/81197/will-apple-use-a-loophole-in-eus-usb-c-requirement \|access-date=2025-08-29 \|website=iFixit}}</ref>

	==References==		==References==
	[[Category:Common terms]]		[[Category:Common terms]]
	<references />		<references />

Agent47 at 09:34, 24 November 2025

2025-11-24T09:34:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:34, 24 November 2025
Line 8:		Line 8:
	==Prominent Examples==		==Prominent Examples==

	*[[Apple]]: After being required by the EU to open up their devices to apps sold outside the [[Apple App Store]], the company created a multitude of hurdles, fees and complications to make it as difficult as possible for developers to actually do this, including a requirement that every independently distributed app still be approved by Apple and fees be paid by the developer.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Mendes \|first=Marcus \|date=2025-05-27 \|title=EU ruling: Apple’s App Store still in violation of DMA, 30 days to comply \|url=https://9to5mac.com/2025/05/27/apple-dma-30-days-deadline/ \|access-date=2025-08-29 \|website=9to5Mac}}</ref>		*[[Apple]]: After being required by the EU to open up their devices to apps sold outside the [[Apple App Store]], the company created a multitude of hurdles, fees and complications to make it as difficult as possible for developers to actually do this, including a requirement that every independently distributed app still be approved by Apple and fees be paid by the developer.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Mendes \|first=Marcus \|date=2025-05-27 \|title=EU ruling: Apple’s App Store still in violation of DMA, 30 days to comply \|url=https://9to5mac.com/2025/05/27/apple-dma-30-days-deadline/ \|access-date=2025-08-29 \|website=9to5Mac}}</ref><ref>https://dev.to/1_king_0b1e1f8bfe6d1/how-ios-sideloading-actually-works-in-2025-dev-certs-altstore-and-the-eu-exception-1m2h</ref>
	*[[Apple]]: After the EU mandated USB-C as a charging port for all phones, Apple explored various ways to still require cable and accessorty manufacturers to go through their costly Made for iPhone certification programmes and require consumers to still buy additional cables and accessories.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Roberts \|first=Paul \|date=2023-09-12 \|title=Will Apple Use a Loophole in EU’s USB-C Requirement? \|url=https://de.ifixit.com/News/81197/will-apple-use-a-loophole-in-eus-usb-c-requirement \|access-date=2025-08-29 \|website=iFixit}}</ref>		*[[Apple]]: After the EU mandated USB-C as a charging port for all phones, Apple explored various ways to still require cable and accessorty manufacturers to go through their costly Made for iPhone certification programmes and require consumers to still buy additional cables and accessories.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Roberts \|first=Paul \|date=2023-09-12 \|title=Will Apple Use a Loophole in EU’s USB-C Requirement? \|url=https://de.ifixit.com/News/81197/will-apple-use-a-loophole-in-eus-usb-c-requirement \|access-date=2025-08-29 \|website=iFixit}}</ref>

Beanie Bo: Removed deletion request

2025-11-07T13:32:24Z

Removed deletion request

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:32, 7 November 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{DeletionRequest\|Concept is vague and does not directly tie in with consumer rights.}}~~{{Stub}}		{{Stub}}
	Malicious compliance is an action where one complies with a request or demand, but in such a way that it follows the wording, but not the spirit or intent of the mandate.		Malicious compliance is an action where one complies with a request or demand, but in such a way that it follows the wording, but not the spirit or intent of the mandate.

Drakeula: Drakeula moved page Malicious Compliance to Malicious compliance: Misspelled title: Not in sentence case

2025-10-12T03:37:37Z

Drakeula moved page Malicious Compliance to Malicious compliance: Misspelled title: Not in sentence case

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:37, 12 October 2025
(No difference)

AnotherConsumerRightsPerson: delinkification

2025-10-08T19:55:20Z

delinkification

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:55, 8 October 2025
Line 9:		Line 9:

	*[[Apple]]: After being required by the EU to open up their devices to apps sold outside the [[Apple App Store]], the company created a multitude of hurdles, fees and complications to make it as difficult as possible for developers to actually do this, including a requirement that every independently distributed app still be approved by Apple and fees be paid by the developer.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Mendes \|first=Marcus \|date=2025-05-27 \|title=EU ruling: Apple’s App Store still in violation of DMA, 30 days to comply \|url=https://9to5mac.com/2025/05/27/apple-dma-30-days-deadline/ \|access-date=2025-08-29 \|website=9to5Mac}}</ref>		*[[Apple]]: After being required by the EU to open up their devices to apps sold outside the [[Apple App Store]], the company created a multitude of hurdles, fees and complications to make it as difficult as possible for developers to actually do this, including a requirement that every independently distributed app still be approved by Apple and fees be paid by the developer.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Mendes \|first=Marcus \|date=2025-05-27 \|title=EU ruling: Apple’s App Store still in violation of DMA, 30 days to comply \|url=https://9to5mac.com/2025/05/27/apple-dma-30-days-deadline/ \|access-date=2025-08-29 \|website=9to5Mac}}</ref>
	*[[Apple]]: After the EU mandated USB-C as a charging port for all phones, Apple explored various ways to still require cable and accessorty manufacturers to go through their costly [[Made for iPhone]] certification programmes and require consumers to still buy additional cables and accessories.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Roberts \|first=Paul \|date=2023-09-12 \|title=Will Apple Use a Loophole in EU’s USB-C Requirement? \|url=https://de.ifixit.com/News/81197/will-apple-use-a-loophole-in-eus-usb-c-requirement \|access-date=2025-08-29 \|website=iFixit}}</ref>		*[[Apple]]: After the EU mandated USB-C as a charging port for all phones, Apple explored various ways to still require cable and accessorty manufacturers to go through their costly Made for iPhone certification programmes and require consumers to still buy additional cables and accessories.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Roberts \|first=Paul \|date=2023-09-12 \|title=Will Apple Use a Loophole in EU’s USB-C Requirement? \|url=https://de.ifixit.com/News/81197/will-apple-use-a-loophole-in-eus-usb-c-requirement \|access-date=2025-08-29 \|website=iFixit}}</ref>

	== References ==		==References==
	[[Category:Common terms]]		[[Category:Common terms]]
	<references />		<references />

2A02:810D:548D:E500:2C4B:3CEF:84C6:48FF: Add missing heading to references section

2025-08-30T18:51:51Z

Add missing heading to references section

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:51, 30 August 2025
Line 11:		Line 11:
	*[[Apple]]: After the EU mandated USB-C as a charging port for all phones, Apple explored various ways to still require cable and accessorty manufacturers to go through their costly [[Made for iPhone]] certification programmes and require consumers to still buy additional cables and accessories.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Roberts \|first=Paul \|date=2023-09-12 \|title=Will Apple Use a Loophole in EU’s USB-C Requirement? \|url=https://de.ifixit.com/News/81197/will-apple-use-a-loophole-in-eus-usb-c-requirement \|access-date=2025-08-29 \|website=iFixit}}</ref>		*[[Apple]]: After the EU mandated USB-C as a charging port for all phones, Apple explored various ways to still require cable and accessorty manufacturers to go through their costly [[Made for iPhone]] certification programmes and require consumers to still buy additional cables and accessories.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Roberts \|first=Paul \|date=2023-09-12 \|title=Will Apple Use a Loophole in EU’s USB-C Requirement? \|url=https://de.ifixit.com/News/81197/will-apple-use-a-loophole-in-eus-usb-c-requirement \|access-date=2025-08-29 \|website=iFixit}}</ref>

			== References ==
	[[Category:Common terms]]		[[Category:Common terms]]
	<references />		<references />