Talk:Advertising overload - Revision history

Marc84: /* References using dead links, no archive exists */ Reply

2026-04-13T02:13:36Z

References using dead links, no archive exists: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:13, 13 April 2026
Line 15:		Line 15:
	:::I think I went to your removed version and saw citations 2 and 4 both being completely fine archived. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:14, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		:::I think I went to your removed version and saw citations 2 and 4 both being completely fine archived. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:14, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
	::::Gotcha.  ( ._.)-b — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:19, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		::::Gotcha.  ( ._.)-b — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:19, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
			:::Yes, that's what I meant - the archived snapshots I found were bad. Sorry that wasn't clear. Thanks for taking care of the references. [[User:Marc84\|Marc84]] ([[User talk:Marc84\|talk]]) 02:13, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
	:I've gone ahead and removed the problematic citations. Reference 2 was not a huge loss since there was at least the Daily Mail citation covering the same subject. Reference 4 for the Candy Crush Saga in-game ads was very unfortunate, as I'm only finding conflicting information on how in-game advertising is defined and whether it both exists and is problem — which is very much not helped by the AI slop/hallucinations I've come across while searching.		:I've gone ahead and removed the problematic citations. Reference 2 was not a huge loss since there was at least the Daily Mail citation covering the same subject. Reference 4 for the Candy Crush Saga in-game ads was very unfortunate, as I'm only finding conflicting information on how in-game advertising is defined and whether it both exists and is problem — which is very much not helped by the AI slop/hallucinations I've come across while searching.
	:Goes to show why archiving web pages ASAP is so important. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:09, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		:Goes to show why archiving web pages ASAP is so important. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:09, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
	::no wonder they looked completely fine LOL [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		::no wonder they looked completely fine LOL [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Sojourna: /* References using dead links, no archive exists */ Reply

2026-04-10T05:19:49Z

References using dead links, no archive exists: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:19, 10 April 2026
Line 14:		Line 14:
	::I checked both before I removed them. Neither of the citations had a good capture. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		::I checked both before I removed them. Neither of the citations had a good capture. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
	:::I think I went to your removed version and saw citations 2 and 4 both being completely fine archived. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:14, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		:::I think I went to your removed version and saw citations 2 and 4 both being completely fine archived. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:14, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
			::::Gotcha.  ( ._.)-b — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:19, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
	:I've gone ahead and removed the problematic citations. Reference 2 was not a huge loss since there was at least the Daily Mail citation covering the same subject. Reference 4 for the Candy Crush Saga in-game ads was very unfortunate, as I'm only finding conflicting information on how in-game advertising is defined and whether it both exists and is problem — which is very much not helped by the AI slop/hallucinations I've come across while searching.		:I've gone ahead and removed the problematic citations. Reference 2 was not a huge loss since there was at least the Daily Mail citation covering the same subject. Reference 4 for the Candy Crush Saga in-game ads was very unfortunate, as I'm only finding conflicting information on how in-game advertising is defined and whether it both exists and is problem — which is very much not helped by the AI slop/hallucinations I've come across while searching.
	:Goes to show why archiving web pages ASAP is so important. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:09, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		:Goes to show why archiving web pages ASAP is so important. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:09, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
	::no wonder they looked completely fine LOL [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		::no wonder they looked completely fine LOL [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

AnotherConsumerRightsPerson: /* References using dead links, no archive exists */ Reply

2026-04-10T05:14:26Z

References using dead links, no archive exists: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:14, 10 April 2026
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:They both already have archives that support the reference. I don't know why you can't find them, that's quite weird. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:05, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		:They both already have archives that support the reference. I don't know why you can't find them, that's quite weird. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:05, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
	::I checked both before I removed them. Neither of the citations had a good capture. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		::I checked both before I removed them. Neither of the citations had a good capture. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
			:::I think I went to your removed version and saw citations 2 and 4 both being completely fine archived. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:14, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
	:I've gone ahead and removed the problematic citations. Reference 2 was not a huge loss since there was at least the Daily Mail citation covering the same subject. Reference 4 for the Candy Crush Saga in-game ads was very unfortunate, as I'm only finding conflicting information on how in-game advertising is defined and whether it both exists and is problem — which is very much not helped by the AI slop/hallucinations I've come across while searching.		:I've gone ahead and removed the problematic citations. Reference 2 was not a huge loss since there was at least the Daily Mail citation covering the same subject. Reference 4 for the Candy Crush Saga in-game ads was very unfortunate, as I'm only finding conflicting information on how in-game advertising is defined and whether it both exists and is problem — which is very much not helped by the AI slop/hallucinations I've come across while searching.
	:Goes to show why archiving web pages ASAP is so important. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:09, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		:Goes to show why archiving web pages ASAP is so important. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:09, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
	::no wonder they looked completely fine LOL [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		::no wonder they looked completely fine LOL [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Sojourna: /* References using dead links, no archive exists */

2026-04-10T05:13:50Z

References using dead links, no archive exists

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:13, 10 April 2026
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:They both already have archives that support the reference. I don't know why you can't find them, that's quite weird. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:05, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		:They both already have archives that support the reference. I don't know why you can't find them, that's quite weird. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:05, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
	::I checked both before I removed them. Neither of the citations had a good capture ~~and so I removed them~~. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		::I checked both before I removed them. Neither of the citations had a good capture. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
	:I've gone ahead and removed the problematic citations. Reference 2 was not a huge loss since there was at least the Daily Mail citation covering the same subject. Reference 4 for the Candy Crush Saga in-game ads was very unfortunate, as I'm only finding conflicting information on how in-game advertising is defined and whether it both exists and is problem — which is very much not helped by the AI slop/hallucinations I've come across while searching.		:I've gone ahead and removed the problematic citations. Reference 2 was not a huge loss since there was at least the Daily Mail citation covering the same subject. Reference 4 for the Candy Crush Saga in-game ads was very unfortunate, as I'm only finding conflicting information on how in-game advertising is defined and whether it both exists and is problem — which is very much not helped by the AI slop/hallucinations I've come across while searching.
	:Goes to show why archiving web pages ASAP is so important. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:09, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		:Goes to show why archiving web pages ASAP is so important. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:09, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
	::no wonder they looked completely fine LOL [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		::no wonder they looked completely fine LOL [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

AnotherConsumerRightsPerson: /* References using dead links, no archive exists */ Reply

2026-04-10T05:13:27Z

References using dead links, no archive exists: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:13, 10 April 2026
Line 15:		Line 15:
	:I've gone ahead and removed the problematic citations. Reference 2 was not a huge loss since there was at least the Daily Mail citation covering the same subject. Reference 4 for the Candy Crush Saga in-game ads was very unfortunate, as I'm only finding conflicting information on how in-game advertising is defined and whether it both exists and is problem — which is very much not helped by the AI slop/hallucinations I've come across while searching.		:I've gone ahead and removed the problematic citations. Reference 2 was not a huge loss since there was at least the Daily Mail citation covering the same subject. Reference 4 for the Candy Crush Saga in-game ads was very unfortunate, as I'm only finding conflicting information on how in-game advertising is defined and whether it both exists and is problem — which is very much not helped by the AI slop/hallucinations I've come across while searching.
	:Goes to show why archiving web pages ASAP is so important. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:09, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		:Goes to show why archiving web pages ASAP is so important. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:09, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
			::no wonder they looked completely fine LOL [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Sojourna: /* References using dead links, no archive exists */ Reply

2026-04-10T05:13:26Z

References using dead links, no archive exists: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:13, 10 April 2026
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:They both already have archives that support the reference. I don't know why you can't find them, that's quite weird. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:05, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		:They both already have archives that support the reference. I don't know why you can't find them, that's quite weird. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:05, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
			::I checked both before I removed them. Neither of the citations had a good capture and so I removed them. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
	:I've gone ahead and removed the problematic citations. Reference 2 was not a huge loss since there was at least the Daily Mail citation covering the same subject. Reference 4 for the Candy Crush Saga in-game ads was very unfortunate, as I'm only finding conflicting information on how in-game advertising is defined and whether it both exists and is problem — which is very much not helped by the AI slop/hallucinations I've come across while searching.		:I've gone ahead and removed the problematic citations. Reference 2 was not a huge loss since there was at least the Daily Mail citation covering the same subject. Reference 4 for the Candy Crush Saga in-game ads was very unfortunate, as I'm only finding conflicting information on how in-game advertising is defined and whether it both exists and is problem — which is very much not helped by the AI slop/hallucinations I've come across while searching.
	:Goes to show why archiving web pages ASAP is so important. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:09, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		:Goes to show why archiving web pages ASAP is so important. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:09, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Sojourna: /* References using dead links, no archive exists */ Reply

2026-04-10T05:09:22Z

References using dead links, no archive exists: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:09, 10 April 2026
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:They both already have archives that support the reference. I don't know why you can't find them, that's quite weird. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:05, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		:They both already have archives that support the reference. I don't know why you can't find them, that's quite weird. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:05, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
			:I've gone ahead and removed the problematic citations. Reference 2 was not a huge loss since there was at least the Daily Mail citation covering the same subject. Reference 4 for the Candy Crush Saga in-game ads was very unfortunate, as I'm only finding conflicting information on how in-game advertising is defined and whether it both exists and is problem — which is very much not helped by the AI slop/hallucinations I've come across while searching.
			:Goes to show why archiving web pages ASAP is so important. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:09, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

AnotherConsumerRightsPerson: /* References using dead links, no archive exists */ Reply

2026-04-10T05:05:46Z

References using dead links, no archive exists: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:05, 10 April 2026
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::I didn't have ai generate those lists for the record, that was a user within the log that was feeling particularly lazy [[User:JamesTDG\|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG\|talk]]) 18:51, 13 March 2026 (UTC)		::I didn't have ai generate those lists for the record, that was a user within the log that was feeling particularly lazy [[User:JamesTDG\|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG\|talk]]) 18:51, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

	== References using dead links, no archive exists ==		==References using dead links, no archive exists==

	References 2. and 4. are dead links (404 error on the sites). I searched IA, Ghostarchive, and Megalodon and there's no archived copies (the snaps show errors). Should these references be removed? They currently use Cite: Web, which (when you Edit references) shows an error because there's no archive link. Should the page's status on [[Projects:Archive everything]] be changed from "Partial" to something else? @[[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|AnotherConsumerRightsPerson]], thoughts? [[User:Marc84\|Marc84]] ([[User talk:Marc84\|talk]]) 02:26, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		References 2. and 4. are dead links (404 error on the sites). I searched IA, Ghostarchive, and Megalodon and there's no archived copies (the snaps show errors). Should these references be removed? They currently use Cite: Web, which (when you Edit references) shows an error because there's no archive link. Should the page's status on [[Projects:Archive everything]] be changed from "Partial" to something else? @[[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|AnotherConsumerRightsPerson]], thoughts? [[User:Marc84\|Marc84]] ([[User talk:Marc84\|talk]]) 02:26, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

			:They both already have archives that support the reference. I don't know why you can't find them, that's quite weird. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:05, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Marc84: /* References using dead links, no archive exists */ new section

2026-04-10T02:26:56Z

References using dead links, no archive exists: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:26, 10 April 2026
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:Cheers! [[User:Scholar Silas\|Scholar Silas]] ([[User talk:Scholar Silas\|talk]]) 05:31, 12 March 2026 (UTC)		:Cheers! [[User:Scholar Silas\|Scholar Silas]] ([[User talk:Scholar Silas\|talk]]) 05:31, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
	::I didn't have ai generate those lists for the record, that was a user within the log that was feeling particularly lazy [[User:JamesTDG\|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG\|talk]]) 18:51, 13 March 2026 (UTC)		::I didn't have ai generate those lists for the record, that was a user within the log that was feeling particularly lazy [[User:JamesTDG\|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG\|talk]]) 18:51, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

			== References using dead links, no archive exists ==

			References 2. and 4. are dead links (404 error on the sites). I searched IA, Ghostarchive, and Megalodon and there's no archived copies (the snaps show errors). Should these references be removed? They currently use Cite: Web, which (when you Edit references) shows an error because there's no archive link. Should the page's status on [[Projects:Archive everything]] be changed from "Partial" to something else? @[[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|AnotherConsumerRightsPerson]], thoughts? [[User:Marc84\|Marc84]] ([[User talk:Marc84\|talk]]) 02:26, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

JamesTDG: /* Reminder about the markings */ Reply

2026-03-13T18:51:45Z

Reminder about the markings: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:51, 13 March 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Hi there, the AI gen lists at the bottom of the article are covering stuff that heavily supports the article, we NEED these replaced with human-written text, and we ESPECIALLY NEED sources included! I hate that I have to leave these marks on my own article, but it is for the greater good... Please do NOT use the marks as an excuse to blindly delete this (I've seen a few moderators act a little hasty to delete articles that have had these kinds of marks for prolonged periods without discussing it first), I put in a lot of valuable labor that I do NOT want lost! [[User:JamesTDG\|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG\|talk]]) 12:14, 17 October 2025 (UTC)		Hi there, the AI gen lists at the bottom of the article are covering stuff that heavily supports the article, we NEED these replaced with human-written text, and we ESPECIALLY NEED sources included! I hate that I have to leave these marks on my own article, but it is for the greater good... Please do NOT use the marks as an excuse to blindly delete this (I've seen a few moderators act a little hasty to delete articles that have had these kinds of marks for prolonged periods without discussing it first), I put in a lot of valuable labor that I do NOT want lost! [[User:JamesTDG\|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG\|talk]]) 12:14, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

	:Hi James! I've rewritten the list, referencing Google Support. I think your AI did use their article, but it categorized things slightly strangely, so I hope you don't mind that I did a little restructuring.		:Hi James! I've rewritten the list, referencing Google Support. I think your AI did use their article, but it categorized things slightly strangely, so I hope you don't mind that I did a little restructuring.
	:Cheers! [[User:Scholar Silas\|Scholar Silas]] ([[User talk:Scholar Silas\|talk]]) 05:31, 12 March 2026 (UTC)		:Cheers! [[User:Scholar Silas\|Scholar Silas]] ([[User talk:Scholar Silas\|talk]]) 05:31, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
			::I didn't have ai generate those lists for the record, that was a user within the log that was feeling particularly lazy [[User:JamesTDG\|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG\|talk]]) 18:51, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:13, 13 April 2026
Line 15:		Line 15:
	:::I think I went to your removed version and saw citations 2 and 4 both being completely fine archived. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:14, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		:::I think I went to your removed version and saw citations 2 and 4 both being completely fine archived. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:14, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
	::::Gotcha.  ( ._.)-b — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:19, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		::::Gotcha.  ( ._.)-b — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:19, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
			:::Yes, that's what I meant - the archived snapshots I found were bad. Sorry that wasn't clear. Thanks for taking care of the references. [[User:Marc84\|Marc84]] ([[User talk:Marc84\|talk]]) 02:13, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
	:I've gone ahead and removed the problematic citations. Reference 2 was not a huge loss since there was at least the Daily Mail citation covering the same subject. Reference 4 for the Candy Crush Saga in-game ads was very unfortunate, as I'm only finding conflicting information on how in-game advertising is defined and whether it both exists and is problem — which is very much not helped by the AI slop/hallucinations I've come across while searching.		:I've gone ahead and removed the problematic citations. Reference 2 was not a huge loss since there was at least the Daily Mail citation covering the same subject. Reference 4 for the Candy Crush Saga in-game ads was very unfortunate, as I'm only finding conflicting information on how in-game advertising is defined and whether it both exists and is problem — which is very much not helped by the AI slop/hallucinations I've come across while searching.
	:Goes to show why archiving web pages ASAP is so important. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:09, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		:Goes to show why archiving web pages ASAP is so important. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:09, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
	::no wonder they looked completely fine LOL [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		::no wonder they looked completely fine LOL [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:19, 10 April 2026
Line 14:		Line 14:
	::I checked both before I removed them. Neither of the citations had a good capture. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		::I checked both before I removed them. Neither of the citations had a good capture. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
	:::I think I went to your removed version and saw citations 2 and 4 both being completely fine archived. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:14, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		:::I think I went to your removed version and saw citations 2 and 4 both being completely fine archived. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:14, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
			::::Gotcha.  ( ._.)-b — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:19, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
	:I've gone ahead and removed the problematic citations. Reference 2 was not a huge loss since there was at least the Daily Mail citation covering the same subject. Reference 4 for the Candy Crush Saga in-game ads was very unfortunate, as I'm only finding conflicting information on how in-game advertising is defined and whether it both exists and is problem — which is very much not helped by the AI slop/hallucinations I've come across while searching.		:I've gone ahead and removed the problematic citations. Reference 2 was not a huge loss since there was at least the Daily Mail citation covering the same subject. Reference 4 for the Candy Crush Saga in-game ads was very unfortunate, as I'm only finding conflicting information on how in-game advertising is defined and whether it both exists and is problem — which is very much not helped by the AI slop/hallucinations I've come across while searching.
	:Goes to show why archiving web pages ASAP is so important. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:09, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		:Goes to show why archiving web pages ASAP is so important. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:09, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
	::no wonder they looked completely fine LOL [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		::no wonder they looked completely fine LOL [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:14, 10 April 2026
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:They both already have archives that support the reference. I don't know why you can't find them, that's quite weird. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:05, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		:They both already have archives that support the reference. I don't know why you can't find them, that's quite weird. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:05, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
	::I checked both before I removed them. Neither of the citations had a good capture. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		::I checked both before I removed them. Neither of the citations had a good capture. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
			:::I think I went to your removed version and saw citations 2 and 4 both being completely fine archived. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:14, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
	:I've gone ahead and removed the problematic citations. Reference 2 was not a huge loss since there was at least the Daily Mail citation covering the same subject. Reference 4 for the Candy Crush Saga in-game ads was very unfortunate, as I'm only finding conflicting information on how in-game advertising is defined and whether it both exists and is problem — which is very much not helped by the AI slop/hallucinations I've come across while searching.		:I've gone ahead and removed the problematic citations. Reference 2 was not a huge loss since there was at least the Daily Mail citation covering the same subject. Reference 4 for the Candy Crush Saga in-game ads was very unfortunate, as I'm only finding conflicting information on how in-game advertising is defined and whether it both exists and is problem — which is very much not helped by the AI slop/hallucinations I've come across while searching.
	:Goes to show why archiving web pages ASAP is so important. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:09, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		:Goes to show why archiving web pages ASAP is so important. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:09, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
	::no wonder they looked completely fine LOL [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		::no wonder they looked completely fine LOL [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:13, 10 April 2026
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:They both already have archives that support the reference. I don't know why you can't find them, that's quite weird. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:05, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		:They both already have archives that support the reference. I don't know why you can't find them, that's quite weird. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:05, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
	::I checked both before I removed them. Neither of the citations had a good capture ~~and so I removed them~~. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		::I checked both before I removed them. Neither of the citations had a good capture. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
	:I've gone ahead and removed the problematic citations. Reference 2 was not a huge loss since there was at least the Daily Mail citation covering the same subject. Reference 4 for the Candy Crush Saga in-game ads was very unfortunate, as I'm only finding conflicting information on how in-game advertising is defined and whether it both exists and is problem — which is very much not helped by the AI slop/hallucinations I've come across while searching.		:I've gone ahead and removed the problematic citations. Reference 2 was not a huge loss since there was at least the Daily Mail citation covering the same subject. Reference 4 for the Candy Crush Saga in-game ads was very unfortunate, as I'm only finding conflicting information on how in-game advertising is defined and whether it both exists and is problem — which is very much not helped by the AI slop/hallucinations I've come across while searching.
	:Goes to show why archiving web pages ASAP is so important. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:09, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		:Goes to show why archiving web pages ASAP is so important. — [[User:Sojourna\|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna\|talk]]) 05:09, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
	::no wonder they looked completely fine LOL [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)		::no wonder they looked completely fine LOL [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 05:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)