Talk:Davis WeatherLink - Revision history

AnotherConsumerRightsPerson: /* How misleading is it? */ Reply

2025-09-01T11:47:47Z

How misleading is it?: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:47, 1 September 2025
Line 11:		Line 11:

	:@[[User:Keith\|Keith]] Haven’t looked into what you said but decided to ping you back here again as its been a long time since you added this. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|AnotherConsumerRightsPerson]] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 11:44, 1 September 2025 (UTC)		:@[[User:Keith\|Keith]] Haven’t looked into what you said but decided to ping you back here again as its been a long time since you added this. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|AnotherConsumerRightsPerson]] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 11:44, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
			:I just looked at the [[User talk:Fjordpining\|author’s talk page]] and Mr Pollo discussed this article over there. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|AnotherConsumerRightsPerson]] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 11:47, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

AnotherConsumerRightsPerson: /* How misleading is it? */ Reply

2025-09-01T11:44:54Z

How misleading is it?: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:44, 1 September 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== How misleading is it? ==		==How misleading is it?==

	I've looked at the provided citation which references the product page. As the OP mentions, it does seem like labeling of some things as free, with the rest presumed to be non-free. They could certainly be clearer on what non-free actually means, but I don't really see it as particularly out of the ordianary? though they should have probably mentioned the actual prices of said subscriptions on the page.		I've looked at the provided citation which references the product page. As the OP mentions, it does seem like labeling of some things as free, with the rest presumed to be non-free. They could certainly be clearer on what non-free actually means, but I don't really see it as particularly out of the ordianary? though they should have probably mentioned the actual prices of said subscriptions on the page.
Line 9:		Line 9:

	apologies for the delay in posting this, and I hope you're well! [[User:Keith\|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith\|talk]]) 16:09, 21 July 2025 (UTC)		apologies for the delay in posting this, and I hope you're well! [[User:Keith\|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith\|talk]]) 16:09, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

			:@[[User:Keith\|Keith]] Haven’t looked into what you said but decided to ping you back here again as its been a long time since you added this. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|AnotherConsumerRightsPerson]] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 11:44, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

Keith: /* How misleading is it? */ new section

2025-07-21T16:09:53Z

How misleading is it?: new section

New page

== How misleading is it? ==

I've looked at the provided citation which references the product page. As the OP mentions, it does seem like labeling of some things as free, with the rest presumed to be non-free. They could certainly be clearer on what non-free actually means, but I don't really see it as particularly out of the ordianary? though they should have probably mentioned the actual prices of said subscriptions on the page.

Looking at the Wayback machine, it also seems that the project was labeled as discontinued and non-purchaseable, even in 2019.

Is this an issue which has been discussed by anyone other than the OP? If it is something which has had some decent discourse around it that might be able to be referenced for arguments/confirmation that this is an issue which has affected a substantial number of people. Unless this exists I'm still not convinced it meets the threshold for notability.

apologies for the delay in posting this, and I hope you're well! [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 16:09, 21 July 2025 (UTC)