Talk:Disney wrongful-death lawsuit - Revision history

Mr Pollo: /* Relevance */ Reply

2025-10-01T00:45:25Z

Relevance: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:45, 1 October 2025
Line 25:		Line 25:
	:I feel that it should also be expanded to the [[Disney+]] article before its removal. [[User:Mr Pollo\|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo\|talk]]) 22:45, 24 September 2025 (UTC)		:I feel that it should also be expanded to the [[Disney+]] article before its removal. [[User:Mr Pollo\|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo\|talk]]) 22:45, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
	::Done! [[User:Beanie Bo\|Beanie Bo]] ([[User talk:Beanie Bo\|talk]]) 15:13, 29 September 2025 (UTC)		::Done! [[User:Beanie Bo\|Beanie Bo]] ([[User talk:Beanie Bo\|talk]]) 15:13, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
			:::Thanks! I'll make the article a redirect now. [[User:Mr Pollo\|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo\|talk]]) 00:45, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

Beanie Bo: /* Relevance */ Reply

2025-09-29T15:13:45Z

Relevance: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:13, 29 September 2025
Line 24:		Line 24:

	:I feel that it should also be expanded to the [[Disney+]] article before its removal. [[User:Mr Pollo\|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo\|talk]]) 22:45, 24 September 2025 (UTC)		:I feel that it should also be expanded to the [[Disney+]] article before its removal. [[User:Mr Pollo\|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo\|talk]]) 22:45, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
			::Done! [[User:Beanie Bo\|Beanie Bo]] ([[User talk:Beanie Bo\|talk]]) 15:13, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

Mr Pollo: /* Relevance */ Reply

2025-09-24T22:45:24Z

Relevance: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:45, 24 September 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This is the discussion page. Information that applies to all or a large majority of the sections belongs here, otherwise place information within corresponding discussion sections.		This is the discussion page. Information that applies to all or a large majority of the sections belongs here, otherwise place information within corresponding discussion sections.

	== A comment on a goal to set for readability ==		==A comment on a goal to set for readability==

	I believe that this stub has language that is too complex for its purpose to explain the information to a general audience. More specifically, the sentences are long; while this does lead to including more information in fewer total words, it makes it more difficult to read. The current (today is Jan 18 2025) average word count of this stub is 24 words per sentence. I recommend the language be edited to reduce this average to fewer than 20. This may sound like a small and difficult change, but I believe it will make this information much more accessible to the public. I submit this comment as a potential example of a text with a more suitable average.		I believe that this stub has language that is too complex for its purpose to explain the information to a general audience. More specifically, the sentences are long; while this does lead to including more information in fewer total words, it makes it more difficult to read. The current (today is Jan 18 2025) average word count of this stub is 24 words per sentence. I recommend the language be edited to reduce this average to fewer than 20. This may sound like a small and difficult change, but I believe it will make this information much more accessible to the public. I submit this comment as a potential example of a text with a more suitable average.

	== Possible edit to improve readability EDIT Some practice notes on editing and observations ==		==Possible edit to improve readability EDIT Some practice notes on editing and observations==

	The following is unlikely to have the cite notes placed correctly as no attempt was made to do so. The language here is recommended to improve readability. I am no expert and many of these changes may make readability worse. Today is Jan 18 2025.		The following is unlikely to have the cite notes placed correctly as no attempt was made to do so. The language here is recommended to improve readability. I am no expert and many of these changes may make readability worse. Today is Jan 18 2025.
Line 19:		Line 19:
	EDIT 2: There is nothing wrong with the website, it just works in a way that I consider to be very strange. I have successfully merged and split different discussion sections. I know how to reorder discussion sections. Also, I am about to try to delete a test discussion section I made. If it is no longer there, then I did so successfully. Today is still Jan 18 2025. I am trying to include timing information for these edits as I think are appropriate, but I am also erring on the side of too much information, rather than too little.		EDIT 2: There is nothing wrong with the website, it just works in a way that I consider to be very strange. I have successfully merged and split different discussion sections. I know how to reorder discussion sections. Also, I am about to try to delete a test discussion section I made. If it is no longer there, then I did so successfully. Today is still Jan 18 2025. I am trying to include timing information for these edits as I think are appropriate, but I am also erring on the side of too much information, rather than too little.

	== Relevance ==		==Relevance==

	I added this incident to the EULA roofie article, so all is good if mods want to delete this article. [[User:Beanie Bo\|Beanie Bo]] ([[User talk:Beanie Bo\|talk]]) 17:17, 8 September 2025 (UTC)		I added this incident to the EULA roofie article, so all is good if mods want to delete this article. [[User:Beanie Bo\|Beanie Bo]] ([[User talk:Beanie Bo\|talk]]) 17:17, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

			:I feel that it should also be expanded to the [[Disney+]] article before its removal. [[User:Mr Pollo\|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo\|talk]]) 22:45, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

Beanie Bo: /* Relevance */ new section

2025-09-08T17:17:17Z

Relevance: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:17, 8 September 2025
Line 18:		Line 18:

	EDIT 2: There is nothing wrong with the website, it just works in a way that I consider to be very strange. I have successfully merged and split different discussion sections. I know how to reorder discussion sections. Also, I am about to try to delete a test discussion section I made. If it is no longer there, then I did so successfully. Today is still Jan 18 2025. I am trying to include timing information for these edits as I think are appropriate, but I am also erring on the side of too much information, rather than too little.		EDIT 2: There is nothing wrong with the website, it just works in a way that I consider to be very strange. I have successfully merged and split different discussion sections. I know how to reorder discussion sections. Also, I am about to try to delete a test discussion section I made. If it is no longer there, then I did so successfully. Today is still Jan 18 2025. I am trying to include timing information for these edits as I think are appropriate, but I am also erring on the side of too much information, rather than too little.

			== Relevance ==

			I added this incident to the EULA roofie article, so all is good if mods want to delete this article. [[User:Beanie Bo\|Beanie Bo]] ([[User talk:Beanie Bo\|talk]]) 17:17, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

Mingyee: Mingyee moved page Talk:Disney Wrongful Death Lawsuit to Talk:Disney wrongful-death lawsuit: Misspelled title

2025-01-23T08:41:21Z

Mingyee moved page Talk:Disney Wrongful Death Lawsuit to Talk:Disney wrongful-death lawsuit: Misspelled title

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:41, 23 January 2025
(No difference)

SouthPaw at 05:33, 19 January 2025

2025-01-19T05:33:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:33, 19 January 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
			This is the discussion page. Information that applies to all or a large majority of the sections belongs here, otherwise place information within corresponding discussion sections.

			== A comment on a goal to set for readability ==

	I believe that this stub has language that is too complex for its purpose to explain the information to a general audience. More specifically, the sentences are long; while this does lead to including more information in fewer total words, it makes it more difficult to read. The current (today is Jan 18 2025) average word count of this stub is 24 words per sentence. I recommend the language be edited to reduce this average to fewer than 20. This may sound like a small and difficult change, but I believe it will make this information much more accessible to the public. I submit this comment as a potential example of a text with a more suitable average.		I believe that this stub has language that is too complex for its purpose to explain the information to a general audience. More specifically, the sentences are long; while this does lead to including more information in fewer total words, it makes it more difficult to read. The current (today is Jan 18 2025) average word count of this stub is 24 words per sentence. I recommend the language be edited to reduce this average to fewer than 20. This may sound like a small and difficult change, but I believe it will make this information much more accessible to the public. I submit this comment as a potential example of a text with a more suitable average.

SouthPaw at 05:29, 19 January 2025

2025-01-19T05:29:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:29, 19 January 2025
Line 14:		Line 14:

	EDIT 2: There is nothing wrong with the website, it just works in a way that I consider to be very strange. I have successfully merged and split different discussion sections. I know how to reorder discussion sections. Also, I am about to try to delete a test discussion section I made. If it is no longer there, then I did so successfully. Today is still Jan 18 2025. I am trying to include timing information for these edits as I think are appropriate, but I am also erring on the side of too much information, rather than too little.		EDIT 2: There is nothing wrong with the website, it just works in a way that I consider to be very strange. I have successfully merged and split different discussion sections. I know how to reorder discussion sections. Also, I am about to try to delete a test discussion section I made. If it is no longer there, then I did so successfully. Today is still Jan 18 2025. I am trying to include timing information for these edits as I think are appropriate, but I am also erring on the side of too much information, rather than too little.

	~~== Test Section ==~~

	~~Test Section created Jan 18 2025. I intend to delete this and am using this to learn how the discussion editing interface works.~~

SouthPaw: /* Possible edit to improve readability EDIT Some practice notes on editing and observations */

2025-01-19T05:28:21Z

Possible edit to improve readability EDIT Some practice notes on editing and observations

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:28, 19 January 2025
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Also, I am planning to create one more discussion section in this discussion to see and test if and how the discussion sections can be reordered, and after that, if and how unnecessary discussion sections can be deleted (I plan to delete the one I add if possible and add any pertinent observations in this discussion section and after this note).		Also, I am planning to create one more discussion section in this discussion to see and test if and how the discussion sections can be reordered, and after that, if and how unnecessary discussion sections can be deleted (I plan to delete the one I add if possible and add any pertinent observations in this discussion section and after this note).

			EDIT 2: There is nothing wrong with the website, it just works in a way that I consider to be very strange. I have successfully merged and split different discussion sections. I know how to reorder discussion sections. Also, I am about to try to delete a test discussion section I made. If it is no longer there, then I did so successfully. Today is still Jan 18 2025. I am trying to include timing information for these edits as I think are appropriate, but I am also erring on the side of too much information, rather than too little.

	== Test Section ==		== Test Section ==

	Test Section created Jan 18 2025. I intend to delete this and am using this to learn how the discussion editing interface works.		Test Section created Jan 18 2025. I intend to delete this and am using this to learn how the discussion editing interface works.

SouthPaw at 05:23, 19 January 2025

2025-01-19T05:23:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:23, 19 January 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I believe that this stub has language that is too complex for its purpose to explain the information to a general audience. More specifically, the sentences are long; while this does lead to including more information in fewer total words, it makes it more difficult to read. The current (today is Jan 18 2025) average word count of this stub is 24 words per sentence. I recommend the language be edited to reduce this average to fewer than 20. This may sound like a small and difficult change, but I believe it will make this information much more accessible to the public. I submit this comment as a potential example of a text with a more suitable average.		I believe that this stub has language that is too complex for its purpose to explain the information to a general audience. More specifically, the sentences are long; while this does lead to including more information in fewer total words, it makes it more difficult to read. The current (today is Jan 18 2025) average word count of this stub is 24 words per sentence. I recommend the language be edited to reduce this average to fewer than 20. This may sound like a small and difficult change, but I believe it will make this information much more accessible to the public. I submit this comment as a potential example of a text with a more suitable average.

			== Possible edit to improve readability EDIT Some practice notes on editing and observations ==

	The following is unlikely to have the cite notes placed correctly as no attempt was made to do so. The language here is recommended to improve readability. I am no expert and many of these changes may make readability worse. Today is Jan 18 2025.		The following is unlikely to have the cite notes placed correctly as no attempt was made to do so. The language here is recommended to improve readability. I am no expert and many of these changes may make readability worse. Today is Jan 18 2025.

SouthPaw: /* Test Section */

2025-01-19T05:20:01Z

Test Section

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:20, 19 January 2025
Line 13:		Line 13:
	== Test Section ==		== Test Section ==

	Test Section created Jan 18 2025. I intend to delete this and am using this to learn how the discussion editing interface works		Test Section created Jan 18 2025. I intend to delete this and am using this to learn how the discussion editing interface works.

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:45, 1 October 2025
Line 25:		Line 25:
	:I feel that it should also be expanded to the [[Disney+]] article before its removal. [[User:Mr Pollo\|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo\|talk]]) 22:45, 24 September 2025 (UTC)		:I feel that it should also be expanded to the [[Disney+]] article before its removal. [[User:Mr Pollo\|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo\|talk]]) 22:45, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
	::Done! [[User:Beanie Bo\|Beanie Bo]] ([[User talk:Beanie Bo\|talk]]) 15:13, 29 September 2025 (UTC)		::Done! [[User:Beanie Bo\|Beanie Bo]] ([[User talk:Beanie Bo\|talk]]) 15:13, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
			:::Thanks! I'll make the article a redirect now. [[User:Mr Pollo\|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo\|talk]]) 00:45, 1 October 2025 (UTC)