https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3AForced_arbitrationTalk:Forced arbitration - Revision history2026-07-07T22:12:42ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.44.0https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Forced_arbitration&diff=59832&oldid=prevJamesTDG: /* New section for consideration */ new section2026-07-07T09:14:43Z<p><span class="autocomment">New section for consideration: </span> new section</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>== New section for consideration ==<br />
<br />
I think one of the most important reasons why people should push back against FA should be how it encourages each company to integrate it to become sloppy, considering its abuse has been to evade legal consequences. Of course, such a project should be considered with dedicated research first, we don't want baseless conjecture on the wiki, even if we've seen the patterns. [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 09:14, 7 July 2026 (UTC)</div>JamesTDG