Talk:Piracy - Revision history

Keith: /* Does this fit on the wiki? */ Reply

2025-11-14T14:30:53Z

Does this fit on the wiki?: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:30, 14 November 2025
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:::::Good question. I was thinking of redirects. "piracy" and other alternative terms would all go to the same article [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 07:22, 14 November 2025 (UTC)		:::::Good question. I was thinking of redirects. "piracy" and other alternative terms would all go to the same article [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 07:22, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
	::::::Still got no game plan, but I can at least propose "Unauthorized replication" for the primary title, since I have seen it referred to as such inside EULAs. [[User:JamesTDG\|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG\|talk]]) 11:59, 14 November 2025 (UTC)		::::::Still got no game plan, but I can at least propose "Unauthorized replication" for the primary title, since I have seen it referred to as such inside EULAs. [[User:JamesTDG\|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG\|talk]]) 11:59, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
			::::::The problem was not the name, it was more the content of the article, and how that content fits in. An article which is neutrally descriptive of piracy would be fine, however the same effect could generally be achieved by simply linking the wikipedia page for online piracy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_piracy
			::::::I don't really see what it would make sense for us to include on an article about piracy that would be more useful to us than just linking the wikipedia page. [[User:Keith\|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith\|talk]]) 14:30, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

JamesTDG: /* Does this fit on the wiki? */ Reply

2025-11-14T11:59:50Z

Does this fit on the wiki?: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:59, 14 November 2025
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::::How would we rephrase ‘piracy’ though? It's baked into the industries as piracy and may not be recognisable otherwise. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 07:12, 14 November 2025 (UTC)		::::How would we rephrase ‘piracy’ though? It's baked into the industries as piracy and may not be recognisable otherwise. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 07:12, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
	:::::Good question. I was thinking of redirects. "piracy" and other alternative terms would all go to the same article [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 07:22, 14 November 2025 (UTC)		:::::Good question. I was thinking of redirects. "piracy" and other alternative terms would all go to the same article [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 07:22, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
			::::::Still got no game plan, but I can at least propose "Unauthorized replication" for the primary title, since I have seen it referred to as such inside EULAs. [[User:JamesTDG\|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG\|talk]]) 11:59, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Rudxain: /* Does this fit on the wiki? */ Reply

2025-11-14T07:22:42Z

Does this fit on the wiki?: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:22, 14 November 2025
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:::Thanks for the info. But that's one of the reasons why I posted that link. We could rephrase "piracy" to avoid problems [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 06:21, 14 November 2025 (UTC)		:::Thanks for the info. But that's one of the reasons why I posted that link. We could rephrase "piracy" to avoid problems [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 06:21, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
	::::How would we rephrase ‘piracy’ though? It's baked into the industries as piracy and may not be recognisable otherwise. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 07:12, 14 November 2025 (UTC)		::::How would we rephrase ‘piracy’ though? It's baked into the industries as piracy and may not be recognisable otherwise. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 07:12, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
			:::::Good question. I was thinking of redirects. "piracy" and other alternative terms would all go to the same article [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 07:22, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

AnotherConsumerRightsPerson: /* Does this fit on the wiki? */ Reply

2025-11-14T07:12:35Z

Does this fit on the wiki?: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:12, 14 November 2025
Line 10:		Line 10:
	::The reason why this was deleted was because there was no proper plan on how to do it, not because it is irrelevant. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 06:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)		::The reason why this was deleted was because there was no proper plan on how to do it, not because it is irrelevant. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 06:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
	:::Thanks for the info. But that's one of the reasons why I posted that link. We could rephrase "piracy" to avoid problems [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 06:21, 14 November 2025 (UTC)		:::Thanks for the info. But that's one of the reasons why I posted that link. We could rephrase "piracy" to avoid problems [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 06:21, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
			::::How would we rephrase ‘piracy’ though? It's baked into the industries as piracy and may not be recognisable otherwise. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 07:12, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Rudxain: /* Does this fit on the wiki? */ Reply

2025-11-14T06:21:39Z

Does this fit on the wiki?: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:21, 14 November 2025
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Piracy [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 05:33, 14 November 2025 (UTC)		:https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Piracy [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 05:33, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
	::The reason why this was deleted was because there was no proper plan on how to do it, not because it is irrelevant. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 06:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)		::The reason why this was deleted was because there was no proper plan on how to do it, not because it is irrelevant. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 06:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
			:::Thanks for the info. But that's one of the reasons why I posted that link. We could rephrase "piracy" to avoid problems [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 06:21, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

AnotherConsumerRightsPerson: /* Does this fit on the wiki? */ Reply

2025-11-14T06:05:26Z

Does this fit on the wiki?: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:05, 14 November 2025
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::::Yeah, toss it out. Maybe also protect the title for now, until we can have a staff member discuss a proper game plan for how we should actually handle this theme article [[User:JamesTDG\|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG\|talk]]) 15:27, 11 September 2025 (UTC)		::::Yeah, toss it out. Maybe also protect the title for now, until we can have a staff member discuss a proper game plan for how we should actually handle this theme article [[User:JamesTDG\|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG\|talk]]) 15:27, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
	:https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Piracy [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 05:33, 14 November 2025 (UTC)		:https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Piracy [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 05:33, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
			::The reason why this was deleted was because there was no proper plan on how to do it, not because it is irrelevant. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 06:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Rudxain: /* Does this fit on the wiki? */ Reply

2025-11-14T05:33:48Z

Does this fit on the wiki?: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:33, 14 November 2025
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:::came across this again... proposing deletion as I can't really see how an article on this could be made comfortably. Could probably be done, but I'm not sure this stub helps anyone [[User:Keith\|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith\|talk]]) 15:16, 11 September 2025 (UTC)		:::came across this again... proposing deletion as I can't really see how an article on this could be made comfortably. Could probably be done, but I'm not sure this stub helps anyone [[User:Keith\|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith\|talk]]) 15:16, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
	::::Yeah, toss it out. Maybe also protect the title for now, until we can have a staff member discuss a proper game plan for how we should actually handle this theme article [[User:JamesTDG\|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG\|talk]]) 15:27, 11 September 2025 (UTC)		::::Yeah, toss it out. Maybe also protect the title for now, until we can have a staff member discuss a proper game plan for how we should actually handle this theme article [[User:JamesTDG\|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG\|talk]]) 15:27, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
			:https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Piracy [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 05:33, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

JamesTDG: /* Does this fit on the wiki? */ Reply

2025-09-11T15:27:02Z

Does this fit on the wiki?: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:27, 11 September 2025
Line 6:		Line 6:
	::@[[User:Keith\|Keith]]@[[User:JamesTDG\|JamesTDG]] Have to agree here. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|AnotherConsumerRightsPerson]] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 09:50, 2 September 2025 (UTC)		::@[[User:Keith\|Keith]]@[[User:JamesTDG\|JamesTDG]] Have to agree here. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|AnotherConsumerRightsPerson]] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 09:50, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
	:::came across this again... proposing deletion as I can't really see how an article on this could be made comfortably. Could probably be done, but I'm not sure this stub helps anyone [[User:Keith\|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith\|talk]]) 15:16, 11 September 2025 (UTC)		:::came across this again... proposing deletion as I can't really see how an article on this could be made comfortably. Could probably be done, but I'm not sure this stub helps anyone [[User:Keith\|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith\|talk]]) 15:16, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
			::::Yeah, toss it out. Maybe also protect the title for now, until we can have a staff member discuss a proper game plan for how we should actually handle this theme article [[User:JamesTDG\|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG\|talk]]) 15:27, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

Keith: /* Does this fit on the wiki? */ Reply

2025-09-11T15:16:48Z

Does this fit on the wiki?: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:16, 11 September 2025
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:I must concur here, we really need to ensure the wiki doesn't go under fire from the FBI because we spoke positively of the practice. Traditionally when piracy is mentioned on the wiki, it should represent the consumer reaction, such as what happened with Spore, which led to an excess of individuals pirating the game. [[User:JamesTDG\|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG\|talk]]) 23:37, 15 August 2025 (UTC)		:I must concur here, we really need to ensure the wiki doesn't go under fire from the FBI because we spoke positively of the practice. Traditionally when piracy is mentioned on the wiki, it should represent the consumer reaction, such as what happened with Spore, which led to an excess of individuals pirating the game. [[User:JamesTDG\|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG\|talk]]) 23:37, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
	::@[[User:Keith\|Keith]]@[[User:JamesTDG\|JamesTDG]] Have to agree here. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|AnotherConsumerRightsPerson]] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 09:50, 2 September 2025 (UTC)		::@[[User:Keith\|Keith]]@[[User:JamesTDG\|JamesTDG]] Have to agree here. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|AnotherConsumerRightsPerson]] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 09:50, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
			:::came across this again... proposing deletion as I can't really see how an article on this could be made comfortably. Could probably be done, but I'm not sure this stub helps anyone [[User:Keith\|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith\|talk]]) 15:16, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

AnotherConsumerRightsPerson: /* Does this fit on the wiki? */ Reply

2025-09-02T09:50:00Z

Does this fit on the wiki?: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:50, 2 September 2025
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:I must concur here, we really need to ensure the wiki doesn't go under fire from the FBI because we spoke positively of the practice. Traditionally when piracy is mentioned on the wiki, it should represent the consumer reaction, such as what happened with Spore, which led to an excess of individuals pirating the game. [[User:JamesTDG\|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG\|talk]]) 23:37, 15 August 2025 (UTC)		:I must concur here, we really need to ensure the wiki doesn't go under fire from the FBI because we spoke positively of the practice. Traditionally when piracy is mentioned on the wiki, it should represent the consumer reaction, such as what happened with Spore, which led to an excess of individuals pirating the game. [[User:JamesTDG\|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG\|talk]]) 23:37, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
			::@[[User:Keith\|Keith]]@[[User:JamesTDG\|JamesTDG]] Have to agree here. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|AnotherConsumerRightsPerson]] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 09:50, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:59, 14 November 2025
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::::How would we rephrase ‘piracy’ though? It's baked into the industries as piracy and may not be recognisable otherwise. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 07:12, 14 November 2025 (UTC)		::::How would we rephrase ‘piracy’ though? It's baked into the industries as piracy and may not be recognisable otherwise. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 07:12, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
	:::::Good question. I was thinking of redirects. "piracy" and other alternative terms would all go to the same article [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 07:22, 14 November 2025 (UTC)		:::::Good question. I was thinking of redirects. "piracy" and other alternative terms would all go to the same article [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 07:22, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
			::::::Still got no game plan, but I can at least propose "Unauthorized replication" for the primary title, since I have seen it referred to as such inside EULAs. [[User:JamesTDG\|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG\|talk]]) 11:59, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:22, 14 November 2025
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:::Thanks for the info. But that's one of the reasons why I posted that link. We could rephrase "piracy" to avoid problems [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 06:21, 14 November 2025 (UTC)		:::Thanks for the info. But that's one of the reasons why I posted that link. We could rephrase "piracy" to avoid problems [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 06:21, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
	::::How would we rephrase ‘piracy’ though? It's baked into the industries as piracy and may not be recognisable otherwise. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 07:12, 14 November 2025 (UTC)		::::How would we rephrase ‘piracy’ though? It's baked into the industries as piracy and may not be recognisable otherwise. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 07:12, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
			:::::Good question. I was thinking of redirects. "piracy" and other alternative terms would all go to the same article [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 07:22, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:12, 14 November 2025
Line 10:		Line 10:
	::The reason why this was deleted was because there was no proper plan on how to do it, not because it is irrelevant. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 06:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)		::The reason why this was deleted was because there was no proper plan on how to do it, not because it is irrelevant. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 06:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
	:::Thanks for the info. But that's one of the reasons why I posted that link. We could rephrase "piracy" to avoid problems [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 06:21, 14 November 2025 (UTC)		:::Thanks for the info. But that's one of the reasons why I posted that link. We could rephrase "piracy" to avoid problems [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 06:21, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
			::::How would we rephrase ‘piracy’ though? It's baked into the industries as piracy and may not be recognisable otherwise. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 07:12, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:21, 14 November 2025
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Piracy [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 05:33, 14 November 2025 (UTC)		:https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Piracy [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 05:33, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
	::The reason why this was deleted was because there was no proper plan on how to do it, not because it is irrelevant. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 06:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)		::The reason why this was deleted was because there was no proper plan on how to do it, not because it is irrelevant. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 06:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
			:::Thanks for the info. But that's one of the reasons why I posted that link. We could rephrase "piracy" to avoid problems [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 06:21, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:05, 14 November 2025
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::::Yeah, toss it out. Maybe also protect the title for now, until we can have a staff member discuss a proper game plan for how we should actually handle this theme article [[User:JamesTDG\|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG\|talk]]) 15:27, 11 September 2025 (UTC)		::::Yeah, toss it out. Maybe also protect the title for now, until we can have a staff member discuss a proper game plan for how we should actually handle this theme article [[User:JamesTDG\|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG\|talk]]) 15:27, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
	:https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Piracy [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 05:33, 14 November 2025 (UTC)		:https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Piracy [[User:Rudxain\|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain\|talk]]) 05:33, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
			::The reason why this was deleted was because there was no proper plan on how to do it, not because it is irrelevant. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 06:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)