Talk:Retroactively amended purchase - Revision history

Drakeula: /* Why not merge instead of deleting */ new section

2025-10-19T05:50:08Z

Why not merge instead of deleting: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:50, 19 October 2025
Line 7:		Line 7:

	: The moving of a page not deleting but redirecting is intented behaviour to avoid broken links in cases of pages already populated and part of the wiki. I have deleted the redirect for this now though. [[User:Kostas\|Kostas]] ([[User talk:Kostas\|talk]]) 12:38, 18 January 2025 (UTC)		: The moving of a page not deleting but redirecting is intented behaviour to avoid broken links in cases of pages already populated and part of the wiki. I have deleted the redirect for this now though. [[User:Kostas\|Kostas]] ([[User talk:Kostas\|talk]]) 12:38, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

			== Why not merge instead of deleting ==

			If it is deleted, we lose the history. I agree that there are too many articles of the same topic, but think merge and then change to redirect might be more useful than delete. (But I am not going to appeal it, as long as this winds up a redirect to whichever article we pick to be the final.) [[User:Drakeula\|Drakeula]] ([[User talk:Drakeula\|talk]]) 05:50, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

Kostas at 12:38, 18 January 2025

2025-01-18T12:38:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:38, 18 January 2025
Line 5:		Line 5:

	I move that [[Retroactively amended experiences]] be deleted rather than a redirect. The title "retroactively amended experience" is nonsense. It was an attempt to fix the problem mentioned above, which I later corrected to the current [[Retroactively amended purchase]] by moving the page. At the moment, though, moving pages makes a redirect rather than simply renaming the page. There are also no remaining links to "retroactively amended experience", anyway.[[User:Mingyee\|Mingyee]] ([[User talk:Mingyee\|talk]]) 10:52, 17 January 2025 (UTC)		I move that [[Retroactively amended experiences]] be deleted rather than a redirect. The title "retroactively amended experience" is nonsense. It was an attempt to fix the problem mentioned above, which I later corrected to the current [[Retroactively amended purchase]] by moving the page. At the moment, though, moving pages makes a redirect rather than simply renaming the page. There are also no remaining links to "retroactively amended experience", anyway.[[User:Mingyee\|Mingyee]] ([[User talk:Mingyee\|talk]]) 10:52, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

			: The moving of a page not deleting but redirecting is intented behaviour to avoid broken links in cases of pages already populated and part of the wiki. I have deleted the redirect for this now though. [[User:Kostas\|Kostas]] ([[User talk:Kostas\|talk]]) 12:38, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Mingyee at 10:53, 17 January 2025

2025-01-17T10:53:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:53, 17 January 2025
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Also, this comes across as a bit of a chatgpt dump.		Also, this comes across as a bit of a chatgpt dump.
	-Keith		-Keith

			I move that [[Retroactively amended experiences]] be deleted rather than a redirect. The title "retroactively amended experience" is nonsense. It was an attempt to fix the problem mentioned above, which I later corrected to the current [[Retroactively amended purchase]] by moving the page. At the moment, though, moving pages makes a redirect rather than simply renaming the page. There are also no remaining links to "retroactively amended experience", anyway.[[User:Mingyee\|Mingyee]] ([[User talk:Mingyee\|talk]]) 10:52, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Mingyee: Mingyee moved page Talk:Retroactively amended experiences to Talk:Retroactively amended purchase: This was originally “retroactive amended purchase experience”. It was renamed to avoid an appearance of impropriety and juvenility. The new article title, however, does not accurately reflect the content. It is not an experience that has been amended, but the purchase (whose amendment the consumer experiences this).

2025-01-16T00:22:47Z

Mingyee moved page Talk:Retroactively amended experiences to Talk:Retroactively amended purchase: This was originally “retroactive amended purchase experience”. It was renamed to avoid an appearance of impropriety and juvenility. The new article title, however, does not accurately reflect the content. It is not an experience that has been amended, but the purchase (whose amendment the consumer experiences this).

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:22, 16 January 2025
(No difference)

MoveLateral: MoveLateral moved page Talk:Retroactively Amended Purchase Experience to Talk:Retroactively amended experiences without leaving a redirect: A name change because no, we cannot have articles with titles that spell out "RAPE".

2025-01-15T13:41:33Z

MoveLateral moved page Talk:Retroactively Amended Purchase Experience to Talk:Retroactively amended experiences without leaving a redirect: A name change because no, we cannot have articles with titles that spell out "RAPE".

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:41, 15 January 2025
(No difference)

Keith at 08:15, 15 January 2025

2025-01-15T08:15:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:15, 15 January 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I suggest a move and title change for this page - let's move away from the edgy analogies.		I suggest a move and title change for this page - let's move away from the edgy analogies. (ok - have been informed that this is one that Louis has used. In that case, it's still not appropriate for an article title, but a section within the article can describe it as a popular coloquial term, and highlight why the comparison is made, and reference https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=R(etroactively)+A(mended)+P(urchase)+E(xperience)

	Also, this comes across as a bit of a chatgpt dump.		Also, this comes across as a bit of a chatgpt dump.
	-Keith		-Keith

Keith at 07:58, 15 January 2025

2025-01-15T07:58:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:58, 15 January 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I suggest a move and title change for this page - let's move away from the edgy analogies.		I suggest a move and title change for this page - let's move away from the edgy analogies.
			Also, this comes across as a bit of a chatgpt dump.
			-Keith

Keith: Created page with "I suggest a move and title change for this page - let's move away from the edgy analogies."

2025-01-15T07:56:21Z

Created page with "I suggest a move and title change for this page - let's move away from the edgy analogies."

New page

I suggest a move and title change for this page - let's move away from the edgy analogies.