Talk:Right to own - Revision history

AnotherConsumerRightsPerson: /* Rename to "Erosion of ownership"? */ Reply

2026-03-14T17:00:48Z

Rename to "Erosion of ownership"?: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:00, 14 March 2026
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:Particularly, the new classification of ownership issues I established there seems a little blurry on the edges between them, but that seems to be inevitable, since they're kinda related. [[User:D-side\|D-side]] ([[User talk:D-side\|talk]]) 16:13, 14 March 2026 (UTC)		:Particularly, the new classification of ownership issues I established there seems a little blurry on the edges between them, but that seems to be inevitable, since they're kinda related. [[User:D-side\|D-side]] ([[User talk:D-side\|talk]]) 16:13, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

	== Rename to "Erosion of ownership"? ==		==Rename to "Erosion of ownership"?==

	Looking up "right to ownership" and "right to own" seems to commonly bring up the legal concept of "right to property". While absolutely related, it's a little too wide, the subject of the article is more about that ownership being subtly taken away.		Looking up "right to ownership" and "right to own" seems to commonly bring up the legal concept of "right to property". While absolutely related, it's a little too wide, the subject of the article is more about that ownership being subtly taken away.

	I've added 3 citations that mention "erosion of ownership" in the same sense, and after fleshing out the "Common issues" section I started wondering if that should actually be the article's title, since that wording in particular seems to be more widespread in association with what's being discussed in the article. [[User:D-side\|D-side]] ([[User talk:D-side\|talk]]) 16:19, 14 March 2026 (UTC)		I've added 3 citations that mention "erosion of ownership" in the same sense, and after fleshing out the "Common issues" section I started wondering if that should actually be the article's title, since that wording in particular seems to be more widespread in association with what's being discussed in the article. [[User:D-side\|D-side]] ([[User talk:D-side\|talk]]) 16:19, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

			:That could work. I've created it as a redirect. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 17:00, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

D-side: /* Rename to "Erosion of ownership"? */ new section

2026-03-14T16:19:24Z

Rename to "Erosion of ownership"?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:19, 14 March 2026
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:Would appreciate a review of the new revision to see if I kept the intent and the scope in line with the article's purpose.		:Would appreciate a review of the new revision to see if I kept the intent and the scope in line with the article's purpose.
	:Particularly, the new classification of ownership issues I established there seems a little blurry on the edges between them, but that seems to be inevitable, since they're kinda related. [[User:D-side\|D-side]] ([[User talk:D-side\|talk]]) 16:13, 14 March 2026 (UTC)		:Particularly, the new classification of ownership issues I established there seems a little blurry on the edges between them, but that seems to be inevitable, since they're kinda related. [[User:D-side\|D-side]] ([[User talk:D-side\|talk]]) 16:13, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

			== Rename to "Erosion of ownership"? ==

			Looking up "right to ownership" and "right to own" seems to commonly bring up the legal concept of "right to property". While absolutely related, it's a little too wide, the subject of the article is more about that ownership being subtly taken away.

			I've added 3 citations that mention "erosion of ownership" in the same sense, and after fleshing out the "Common issues" section I started wondering if that should actually be the article's title, since that wording in particular seems to be more widespread in association with what's being discussed in the article. [[User:D-side\|D-side]] ([[User talk:D-side\|talk]]) 16:19, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

D-side: Reply

2026-03-14T16:13:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:13, 14 March 2026
Line 2:		Line 2:

	If my changes are still here and are considered useful, that is. [[User:Webmistress\|Webmistress]] ([[(User talk: Webmistress\|talk]]) 05:38, 24 June 2025 (UTC)		If my changes are still here and are considered useful, that is. [[User:Webmistress\|Webmistress]] ([[(User talk: Webmistress\|talk]]) 05:38, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

			:I started expanding on the definition of the problem and got a little carried away, in the end rewriting almost the whole thing, using prior revision as scaffolding. I left the red links in the security section be.
			:Would appreciate a review of the new revision to see if I kept the intent and the scope in line with the article's purpose.
			:Particularly, the new classification of ownership issues I established there seems a little blurry on the edges between them, but that seems to be inevitable, since they're kinda related. [[User:D-side\|D-side]] ([[User talk:D-side\|talk]]) 16:13, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

AnotherConsumerRightsPerson: Added signature.

2025-09-28T07:32:17Z

Added signature.

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:32, 28 September 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I'm not finished completing this article and I promise to create the articles I've created Red Links for when I wake next.		I'm not finished completing this article and I promise to create the articles I've created Red Links for when I wake next.

	If my changes are still here and are considered useful, that is.		If my changes are still here and are considered useful, that is. [[User:Webmistress\|Webmistress]] ([[(User talk: Webmistress\|talk]]) 05:38, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Webmistress: Created page with "I'm not finished completing this article and I promise to create the articles I've created Red Links for when I wake next. If my changes are still here and are considered useful, that is."

2025-06-24T04:38:34Z

Created page with "I'm not finished completing this article and I promise to create the articles I've created Red Links for when I wake next. If my changes are still here and are considered useful, that is."

New page

I'm not finished completing this article and I promise to create the articles I've created Red Links for when I wake next.

If my changes are still here and are considered useful, that is.