<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AShopee</id>
	<title>Talk:Shopee - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AShopee"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Shopee&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-08T09:12:53Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.44.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Shopee&amp;diff=23293&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Sojourna: /* Images */ new section</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Shopee&amp;diff=23293&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2025-09-01T21:55:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;autocomment&quot;&gt;Images: &lt;/span&gt; new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Images ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a fair amount of screenshot images used to demonstrate what the article is speaking of, which is good but the layout is... questionable, due to being web page screenshots (which both makes a gallery or section grouping impractical). My thoughts on it is that maybe a couple of them need not be as extensive, for the following reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A better scrolling experience.&lt;br /&gt;
*Improved thumbnail views.&lt;br /&gt;
*Avoiding {{Wplink|information overload}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Doing so with an eye towards those goals would improve the quality of the article. — [[User:Sojourna|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna|talk]]) 21:55, 1 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Sojourna</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>