Talk:UK Online Safety Act - Revision history

Big Mac: Big Mac moved page Talk:Implementation of the UK Online Safety Act to Talk:UK Online Safety Act: Pages for other laws on Consumer Rights Wiki just use the name of the law and do not feature "Implementation of the " at the start of the title.

2025-09-01T19:29:18Z

Big Mac moved page Talk:Implementation of the UK Online Safety Act to Talk:UK Online Safety Act: Pages for other laws on Consumer Rights Wiki just use the name of the law and do not feature "Implementation of the " at the start of the title.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:29, 1 September 2025
(No difference)

LegislationRepair: /* Comments */ Reply

2025-08-19T12:26:39Z

Comments: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:26, 19 August 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== The Online Safety Act is a Conspiracy ==		==The Online Safety Act is a Conspiracy==

	The Youtuber Cyber Waffle has been speaking with an MP and is working on setting up an interview. He goes over some things this MP told him in his video entitled "[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAeEK_OMRso&t=301s The Online Safety Act is a Conspiracy]."		The Youtuber Cyber Waffle has been speaking with an MP and is working on setting up an interview. He goes over some things this MP told him in his video entitled "[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAeEK_OMRso&t=301s The Online Safety Act is a Conspiracy]."
Line 7:		Line 7:
	[[User:LegislationRepair\|LegislationRepair]] ([[User talk:LegislationRepair\|talk]]) 16:32, 17 August 2025 (UTC)		[[User:LegislationRepair\|LegislationRepair]] ([[User talk:LegislationRepair\|talk]]) 16:32, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

	== The Online Safety Act is one act in two different stages. ==		==The Online Safety Act is one act in two different stages.==

	The legislation documents are very long and changes between versions are not easy to find. It would be great if someone has the time to comb through the different revisions and find where the identity verification was added. So far the only source for this info is what the Youtuber said the MP told him. There will hopefully be an interview with this MP so we can quote them directly but finding the source in the legislation would be best. [[User:LegislationRepair\|LegislationRepair]] ([[User talk:LegislationRepair\|talk]]) 17:31, 17 August 2025 (UTC)		The legislation documents are very long and changes between versions are not easy to find. It would be great if someone has the time to comb through the different revisions and find where the identity verification was added. So far the only source for this info is what the Youtuber said the MP told him. There will hopefully be an interview with this MP so we can quote them directly but finding the source in the legislation would be best. [[User:LegislationRepair\|LegislationRepair]] ([[User talk:LegislationRepair\|talk]]) 17:31, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

	== Comments ==		==Comments==

	The main comment I wanted to make was on the use of red links. Generally, red links should be used only where it is:		The main comment I wanted to make was on the use of red links. Generally, red links should be used only where it is:

	# expected that a page on the topic would be appropriate for the wiki, and		#expected that a page on the topic would be appropriate for the wiki, and
	# a Wikipedia page does not exist for the relavent entity		#a Wikipedia page does not exist for the relavent entity

	If a reader is looking for additonal context about an involved entity, it will usually be more helpful to point them towards the relevant wikipedia page than to provide them with a red link here.		If a reader is looking for additonal context about an involved entity, it will usually be more helpful to point them towards the relevant wikipedia page than to provide them with a red link here.
Line 23:		Line 23:

	It also probably needs some information explaining the different 'classes' that websites can be sorted into based on their size, content, and features, and how the requirements differ based on that. [[User:Keith\|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith\|talk]]) 11:43, 19 August 2025 (UTC)		It also probably needs some information explaining the different 'classes' that websites can be sorted into based on their size, content, and features, and how the requirements differ based on that. [[User:Keith\|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith\|talk]]) 11:43, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

			:Good call. I've remove the red links since anyone can come in and link a related article once it exists.
			:I've read a lot of articles and watched a lot of videos on the Online Safety Act and its implications and haven't found anything that has broken down the duty of care like Theo. It would definitely be better for the article if someone found a better (written) source that cover the broader impacts of getting these things wrong. I believe the privacy and monitoring implications of this bill are what makes it most relevant to this wiki.
			:Outlining the three different classes of websites outlined by the act is also a great idea.
			:Thanks Keith! [[User:LegislationRepair\|LegislationRepair]] ([[User talk:LegislationRepair\|talk]]) 12:26, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Keith: /* Comments */ new section

2025-08-19T11:43:26Z

Comments: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:43, 19 August 2025
Line 10:		Line 10:

	The legislation documents are very long and changes between versions are not easy to find. It would be great if someone has the time to comb through the different revisions and find where the identity verification was added. So far the only source for this info is what the Youtuber said the MP told him. There will hopefully be an interview with this MP so we can quote them directly but finding the source in the legislation would be best. [[User:LegislationRepair\|LegislationRepair]] ([[User talk:LegislationRepair\|talk]]) 17:31, 17 August 2025 (UTC)		The legislation documents are very long and changes between versions are not easy to find. It would be great if someone has the time to comb through the different revisions and find where the identity verification was added. So far the only source for this info is what the Youtuber said the MP told him. There will hopefully be an interview with this MP so we can quote them directly but finding the source in the legislation would be best. [[User:LegislationRepair\|LegislationRepair]] ([[User talk:LegislationRepair\|talk]]) 17:31, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

			== Comments ==

			The main comment I wanted to make was on the use of red links. Generally, red links should be used only where it is:

			# expected that a page on the topic would be appropriate for the wiki, and
			# a Wikipedia page does not exist for the relavent entity

			If a reader is looking for additonal context about an involved entity, it will usually be more helpful to point them towards the relevant wikipedia page than to provide them with a red link here.

			Other than that, I feel like Theo's section may be given undue weight? there's been an awful lot of commentary on the act out there so it should be possible to find more/better sources which make similar points but are more reputable.

			It also probably needs some information explaining the different 'classes' that websites can be sorted into based on their size, content, and features, and how the requirements differ based on that. [[User:Keith\|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith\|talk]]) 11:43, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

LegislationRepair: /* The Online Safety Act is one act in two different stages. */ new section

2025-08-17T17:31:02Z

The Online Safety Act is one act in two different stages.: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:31, 17 August 2025
Line 6:		Line 6:

	[[User:LegislationRepair\|LegislationRepair]] ([[User talk:LegislationRepair\|talk]]) 16:32, 17 August 2025 (UTC)		[[User:LegislationRepair\|LegislationRepair]] ([[User talk:LegislationRepair\|talk]]) 16:32, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

			== The Online Safety Act is one act in two different stages. ==

			The legislation documents are very long and changes between versions are not easy to find. It would be great if someone has the time to comb through the different revisions and find where the identity verification was added. So far the only source for this info is what the Youtuber said the MP told him. There will hopefully be an interview with this MP so we can quote them directly but finding the source in the legislation would be best. [[User:LegislationRepair\|LegislationRepair]] ([[User talk:LegislationRepair\|talk]]) 17:31, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

LegislationRepair: /* The Online Safety Act is a Conspiracy */ new section

2025-08-17T16:32:29Z

The Online Safety Act is a Conspiracy: new section

New page

== The Online Safety Act is a Conspiracy ==

The Youtuber Cyber Waffle has been speaking with an MP and is working on setting up an interview. He goes over some things this MP told him in his video entitled "[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAeEK_OMRso&t=301s The Online Safety Act is a Conspiracy]."

It would be great for the wiki to independently verify these claims that are made in the video for inclusion in this article. There are mentions of some damning things about Carnegie UK and profiting off of biometrics and identity confirmation systems. If verified and referenced, we could include articles on Carnegie and the third party identity verification companies to paint a broader picture.

[[User:LegislationRepair|LegislationRepair]] ([[User talk:LegislationRepair|talk]]) 16:32, 17 August 2025 (UTC)