<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AVerizon_demo_phone_MDM_data_wipe</id>
	<title>Talk:Verizon demo phone MDM data wipe - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AVerizon_demo_phone_MDM_data_wipe"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Verizon_demo_phone_MDM_data_wipe&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-06-15T17:48:26Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.44.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Verizon_demo_phone_MDM_data_wipe&amp;diff=57991&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Keith: /* Relevancy/article framing */ new section</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Verizon_demo_phone_MDM_data_wipe&amp;diff=57991&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-06-15T12:51:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;autocomment&quot;&gt;Relevancy/article framing: &lt;/span&gt; new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Relevancy/article framing ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just wanted to start a discussion on this article&amp;#039;s relevancy - the person who just blanked the page was clearly out of line, but I think there is some merit to a discussion on how relevant this article is, since it is about a single customer&amp;#039;s bad warranty experience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IMO the only aspect of this case which is notable enough from a consumer rights perspective to cover is the company&amp;#039;s refusal to disclose what information they had access to during the fuckup (as that&amp;#039;s a fairly unique and interesting situation, beyond simply &amp;#039;they sent the wrong phone and it wiped itself and they were a bit stingy about compensating the user&amp;#039; and the article should either be removed, or restructured to focus on that data access disclosure angle. [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 12:51, 15 June 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Keith</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>