<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AXbox</id>
	<title>Talk:Xbox - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AXbox"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Xbox&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-01T04:40:19Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.44.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Xbox&amp;diff=28409&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Drakeula: /* Appeal deletion */</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Xbox&amp;diff=28409&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2025-10-24T00:49:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;autocomment&quot;&gt;Appeal deletion&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Appeal deletion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I posted an appeal of the deletion suggestion.  There is certainly enough source material to make a worth-while, on topic article about xbox.  There is no requirement that we make articles fast, so how long since edits were made should not be a criterion for deletion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a reasonable amount of material on xbox in the Microsoft article.  It would make sense to move the bulk of that here, and just put a summary there.[[User:Drakeula|Drakeula]] ([[User talk:Drakeula|talk]]) 00:49, 24 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Drakeula</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>