User:JackFromWisconsin/Article status - Revision history

JackFromWisconsin: /* Changing status */ add

2025-08-22T18:25:46Z

Changing status: add

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:25, 22 August 2025
Line 8:		Line 8:

	==Changing status==		==Changing status==
	Anyone can assign the status of stub, incomplete, or usable. If an article is already marked as a stub or incomplete, an editor must ask a moderator to change its status at the [[Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderators' noticeboard\|moderators' noticeboard]]. If an article has no clean up templates, it may then be marked as usable.		Anyone can assign the status of stub, incomplete, or usable. If an article is already marked as a stub or incomplete, an editor must ask a moderator to change its status at the [[Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderators' noticeboard\|moderators' noticeboard]]. If an article has no clean up templates, it may then be marked as usable by anyone. Of course, please make sure it meets the requirements first.

	To identify as article as "star" status, it must be nominated at [[User:JackFromWisconsin/Star nominations\|Star nominations]] and peer reviewed by other editors or moderators. If the article meets the criteria, it may be elevated to star status.		To identify as article as "star" status, it must be nominated at [[User:JackFromWisconsin/Star nominations\|Star nominations]] and peer reviewed by other editors or moderators. If the article meets the criteria, it may be elevated to star status.

JackFromWisconsin: /* Status criteria */ clarify

2025-08-22T18:24:29Z

Status criteria: clarify

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:24, 22 August 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Consumer Rights Wiki articles are edited and develop over time, as they get attention from various contributors. The following is a guide to which articles can be rated.		Consumer Rights Wiki articles are edited and develop over time, as they get attention from various contributors. The following is a guide to which articles can be rated.

	== Status criteria ==		==Status criteria==

	# '''Stub/Incomplete''' – An article with little or no information. Not following the [[Consumer Rights Wiki:Wiki content policies\|content policies]]. Only has the preformatted "template" article without any (or very little) information.		#'''Stub/Incomplete''' – An article with little or no information. Not following the [[Consumer Rights Wiki:Wiki content policies\|content policies]]. Only has the preformatted "template" article without any (or very little) information. An incomplete article has a bit more information, but is still missing enough information to not be useful to the average person. Articles without reliable sources are incomplete by definition.
	# '''Usable''' – Contains enough information to be usable to the average person. All sections have some information, even if very little. Enough references to verify the content. Could reasonably help someone looking for guidance on a consumer rights issue.		#'''Usable''' – Contains enough information to be usable to the average person. All sections have some information, even if very little. Enough references to verify the content. Could reasonably help someone looking for guidance on a consumer rights issue.
	# '''Star''' – Identified as one of our best articles one the wiki. A very useful article that includes everything an individual could want. These articles <u>must</u> follow all of the [[Consumer Rights Wiki:Wiki policy index\|wiki policy index]], including [[Consumer Rights Wiki:Verifiability\|Verifiability]], [[Consumer Rights Wiki:Living persons policy\|Living persons policy]], and the [[Consumer Rights Wiki:Style guide\|Style guide]]. The prose ("body text") of the article is well written and free of grammatical errors, all of the citations are properly formatted, and enough media is included to aid the reader. These articles may be considered "complete" unless an update to this consumer rights issue happens (e.g. new lawsuit or a change in company policy).		#'''Star''' – Identified as one of our best articles one the wiki. A very useful article that includes everything an individual could want. These articles <u>must</u> follow all of the [[Consumer Rights Wiki:Wiki policy index\|wiki policy index]], including [[Consumer Rights Wiki:Verifiability\|Verifiability]], [[Consumer Rights Wiki:Living persons policy\|Living persons policy]], and the [[Consumer Rights Wiki:Style guide\|Style guide]]. The prose ("body text") of the article is well written and free of grammatical errors, all of the citations are properly formatted, and enough media is included to aid the reader. These articles may be considered "complete" unless an update to this consumer rights issue happens (e.g. new lawsuit or a change in company policy).

	== Changing status ==		==Changing status==
	Anyone can assign the status of stub, incomplete, or usable. If an article is already marked as a stub or incomplete, an editor must ask a moderator to change its status at the [[Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderators' noticeboard\|moderators' noticeboard]]. If an article has no clean up templates, it may then be marked as usable.		Anyone can assign the status of stub, incomplete, or usable. If an article is already marked as a stub or incomplete, an editor must ask a moderator to change its status at the [[Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderators' noticeboard\|moderators' noticeboard]]. If an article has no clean up templates, it may then be marked as usable.

	To identify as article as "star" status, it must be nominated at [[User:JackFromWisconsin/Star nominations\|Star nominations]] and peer reviewed by other editors or moderators. If the article meets the criteria, it may be elevated to star status.		To identify as article as "star" status, it must be nominated at [[User:JackFromWisconsin/Star nominations\|Star nominations]] and peer reviewed by other editors or moderators. If the article meets the criteria, it may be elevated to star status.

JackFromWisconsin: start criteria on article ratings. need to develop this further before proposing it to the community

2025-08-22T15:07:00Z

start criteria on article ratings. need to develop this further before proposing it to the community

New page

Consumer Rights Wiki articles are edited and develop over time, as they get attention from various contributors. The following is a guide to which articles can be rated.

== Status criteria ==

# '''Stub/Incomplete''' – An article with little or no information. Not following the [[Consumer Rights Wiki:Wiki content policies|content policies]]. Only has the preformatted "template" article without any (or very little) information.
# '''Usable''' – Contains enough information to be usable to the average person. All sections have some information, even if very little. Enough references to verify the content. Could reasonably help someone looking for guidance on a consumer rights issue.
# '''Star''' – Identified as one of our best articles one the wiki. A very useful article that includes everything an individual could want. These articles <u>must</u> follow all of the [[Consumer Rights Wiki:Wiki policy index|wiki policy index]], including [[Consumer Rights Wiki:Verifiability|Verifiability]], [[Consumer Rights Wiki:Living persons policy|Living persons policy]], and the [[Consumer Rights Wiki:Style guide|Style guide]]. The prose ("body text") of the article is well written and free of grammatical errors, all of the citations are properly formatted, and enough media is included to aid the reader. These articles may be considered "complete" unless an update to this consumer rights issue happens (e.g. new lawsuit or a change in company policy).

== Changing status ==
Anyone can assign the status of stub, incomplete, or usable. If an article is already marked as a stub or incomplete, an editor must ask a moderator to change its status at the [[Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderators' noticeboard|moderators' noticeboard]]. If an article has no clean up templates, it may then be marked as usable.

To identify as article as "star" status, it must be nominated at [[User:JackFromWisconsin/Star nominations|Star nominations]] and peer reviewed by other editors or moderators. If the article meets the criteria, it may be elevated to star status.