User:Rudxain - Revision history

Rudxain: add "Google breaks Termux" to index

2026-05-01T03:34:02Z

add "Google breaks Termux" to index

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:34, 1 May 2026
Line 7:		Line 7:
	*[https://web.archive.org/web/20260420215524/https://github.com/Rudxain/RX-wiki/blob/main/wiki/Crap_inhibitors.md "Crap inhibitors" article] (archived, because [https://github.com/Rudxain/Rudxain.github.io/issues/17 this])		*[https://web.archive.org/web/20260420215524/https://github.com/Rudxain/RX-wiki/blob/main/wiki/Crap_inhibitors.md "Crap inhibitors" article] (archived, because [https://github.com/Rudxain/Rudxain.github.io/issues/17 this])
	*[[User:Rudxain/Object transparency movement\|Product transparency proposal]]		*[[User:Rudxain/Object transparency movement\|Product transparency proposal]]
			*[[User:Rudxain/Google breaks Termux\|Google breaks Termux]] (multiple incidents)
	*[[User:Rudxain/Permacomputing\|Permacomputing page]]		*[[User:Rudxain/Permacomputing\|Permacomputing page]]

	BTW, I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources\|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote>		BTW, I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources\|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote>

Rudxain: link my permacomputing page

2026-04-26T06:59:55Z

link my permacomputing page

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:59, 26 April 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:
	You might also be interested in my		You might also be interested in my

	* [https://web.archive.org/web/20260420215524/https://github.com/Rudxain/RX-wiki/blob/main/wiki/Crap_inhibitors.md "Crap inhibitors" article] (archived, because [https://github.com/Rudxain/Rudxain.github.io/issues/17 this])		*[https://web.archive.org/web/20260420215524/https://github.com/Rudxain/RX-wiki/blob/main/wiki/Crap_inhibitors.md "Crap inhibitors" article] (archived, because [https://github.com/Rudxain/Rudxain.github.io/issues/17 this])
	* [[User:Rudxain/Object transparency movement\|Product transparency proposal]]		*[[User:Rudxain/Object transparency movement\|Product transparency proposal]]
			*[[User:Rudxain/Permacomputing\|Permacomputing page]]

	BTW, I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources\|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote>		BTW, I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources\|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote>

Rudxain: link to my OTM

2026-04-22T02:52:19Z

link to my OTM

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:52, 22 April 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:
	If you're looking for a Linux article, see [[User:Rudxain/Unix\|my page on Unix]].		If you're looking for a Linux article, see [[User:Rudxain/Unix\|my page on Unix]].

	You might also be interested in my [https://web.archive.org/web/20260420215524/https://github.com/Rudxain/RX-wiki/blob/main/wiki/Crap_inhibitors.md "Crap inhibitors" article] (archived, because [https://github.com/Rudxain/Rudxain.github.io/issues/17 this]).		You might also be interested in my

			* [https://web.archive.org/web/20260420215524/https://github.com/Rudxain/RX-wiki/blob/main/wiki/Crap_inhibitors.md "Crap inhibitors" article] (archived, because [https://github.com/Rudxain/Rudxain.github.io/issues/17 this])
			* [[User:Rudxain/Object transparency movement\|Product transparency proposal]]

	BTW, I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources\|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote>		BTW, I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources\|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote>

Rudxain: link "Crap inhibitors"

2026-04-20T22:19:28Z

link "Crap inhibitors"

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:19, 20 April 2026
Line 2:		Line 2:

	If you're looking for a Linux article, see [[User:Rudxain/Unix\|my page on Unix]].		If you're looking for a Linux article, see [[User:Rudxain/Unix\|my page on Unix]].

			You might also be interested in my [https://web.archive.org/web/20260420215524/https://github.com/Rudxain/RX-wiki/blob/main/wiki/Crap_inhibitors.md "Crap inhibitors" article] (archived, because [https://github.com/Rudxain/Rudxain.github.io/issues/17 this]).

	BTW, I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources\|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote>		BTW, I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources\|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote>

Rudxain at 18:00, 19 April 2026

2026-04-19T18:00:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:00, 19 April 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[https://rudxain.github.io/ Website] (includes contact info and bio). Note: The ~~entire~~ domain is a [[GitHub\|GH]]-[https://docs.github.com/en/pages Pages] site. Most pages in the domain are <code>no[[JavaScript\|script]]</code>-friendly, though.		[https://rudxain.github.io/ Website] (includes contact info and bio). Note: The domain is a [[GitHub\|GH]]-[https://docs.github.com/en/pages Pages] site. Most pages in the domain are <code>no[[JavaScript\|script]]</code>-friendly, though.

	If you're looking for a Linux article, see [[User:Rudxain/Unix\|my page on Unix]].		If you're looking for a Linux article, see [[User:Rudxain/Unix\|my page on Unix]].

	BTW, I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources\|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote>		BTW, I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources\|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote>

Rudxain: link Unix sub-page

2026-04-17T15:09:10Z

link Unix sub-page

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:09, 17 April 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[https://rudxain.github.io/ Website] (includes contact info and bio). Note: The entire domain is a [[GitHub\|GH]]-[https://docs.github.com/en/pages Pages] site. Most pages in the domain are <code>no[[JavaScript\|script]]</code>-friendly, though.		[https://rudxain.github.io/ Website] (includes contact info and bio). Note: The entire domain is a [[GitHub\|GH]]-[https://docs.github.com/en/pages Pages] site. Most pages in the domain are <code>no[[JavaScript\|script]]</code>-friendly, though.

	I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources\|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote>		If you're looking for a Linux article, see [[User:Rudxain/Unix\|my page on Unix]].

			BTW, I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources\|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote>

Rudxain: remove cloudflare speculation, and minify links

2026-03-23T17:21:42Z

remove cloudflare speculation, and minify links

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:21, 23 March 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[https://rudxain.github.io/ Website] (includes contact info and bio). Note: The entire domain is a [https://docs.github.com/en/pages ~~GH-~~Pages] site ~~(see [[GitHub\|GH]]), which is likely hosted on [[Cloudflare\|CloudFlare]]'s servers~~. Most pages in the domain are <code>~~noscript~~</code>-friendly ~~(see [[JavaScript\|JS]])~~, though.		[https://rudxain.github.io/ Website] (includes contact info and bio). Note: The entire domain is a [[GitHub\|GH]]-[https://docs.github.com/en/pages Pages] site. Most pages in the domain are <code>no[[JavaScript\|script]]</code>-friendly, though.

	I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources\|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote>		I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources\|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote>

Rudxain: link JS

2026-03-23T17:16:35Z

link JS

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:16, 23 March 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[https://rudxain.github.io/ Website] (includes contact info and bio). Note: The entire domain is a [https://docs.github.com/en/pages GH-Pages] site (see [[GitHub\|GH]]), which is likely hosted on [[Cloudflare\|CloudFlare]]'s servers. Most pages in the domain are <code>noscript</code>-friendly, though.		[https://rudxain.github.io/ Website] (includes contact info and bio). Note: The entire domain is a [https://docs.github.com/en/pages GH-Pages] site (see [[GitHub\|GH]]), which is likely hosted on [[Cloudflare\|CloudFlare]]'s servers. Most pages in the domain are <code>noscript</code>-friendly (see [[JavaScript\|JS]]), though.

	I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources\|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote>		I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources\|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote>

Rudxain: JS article has been created!

2026-03-18T06:11:38Z

JS article has been created!

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:11, 18 March 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[https://rudxain.github.io/ Website] (includes contact info and bio). Note: The entire domain is a [https://docs.github.com/en/pages GH-Pages] site (see [[GitHub\|GH]]), which is likely hosted on [[Cloudflare\|CloudFlare]]'s servers. Most pages in the domain are <code>noscript</code>-friendly, though.		[https://rudxain.github.io/ Website] (includes contact info and bio). Note: The entire domain is a [https://docs.github.com/en/pages GH-Pages] site (see [[GitHub\|GH]]), which is likely hosted on [[Cloudflare\|CloudFlare]]'s servers. Most pages in the domain are <code>noscript</code>-friendly, though.

	~~BTW:~~		I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources\|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote>
	*I want to create an article for [[JavaScript\|JS]] (see [[Special:WhatLinksHere/JavaScript\|WLH]])
	*I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources\|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote>

Rudxain: link to "hidden EULA lang"

2026-03-16T06:36:14Z

link to "hidden EULA lang"

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:36, 16 March 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:
	BTW:		BTW:
	*I want to create an article for [[JavaScript\|JS]] (see [[Special:WhatLinksHere/JavaScript\|WLH]])		*I want to create an article for [[JavaScript\|JS]] (see [[Special:WhatLinksHere/JavaScript\|WLH]])
	*I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW. See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote>		*I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources\|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote>

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:34, 1 May 2026
Line 7:		Line 7:
	*[https://web.archive.org/web/20260420215524/https://github.com/Rudxain/RX-wiki/blob/main/wiki/Crap_inhibitors.md "Crap inhibitors" article] (archived, because [https://github.com/Rudxain/Rudxain.github.io/issues/17 this])		*[https://web.archive.org/web/20260420215524/https://github.com/Rudxain/RX-wiki/blob/main/wiki/Crap_inhibitors.md "Crap inhibitors" article] (archived, because [https://github.com/Rudxain/Rudxain.github.io/issues/17 this])
	*[[User:Rudxain/Object transparency movement\|Product transparency proposal]]		*[[User:Rudxain/Object transparency movement\|Product transparency proposal]]
			*[[User:Rudxain/Google breaks Termux\|Google breaks Termux]] (multiple incidents)
	*[[User:Rudxain/Permacomputing\|Permacomputing page]]		*[[User:Rudxain/Permacomputing\|Permacomputing page]]

	BTW, I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources\|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote>		BTW, I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources\|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote>

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:00, 19 April 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[https://rudxain.github.io/ Website] (includes contact info and bio). Note: The ~~entire~~ domain is a [[GitHub\|GH]]-[https://docs.github.com/en/pages Pages] site. Most pages in the domain are <code>no[[JavaScript\|script]]</code>-friendly, though.		[https://rudxain.github.io/ Website] (includes contact info and bio). Note: The domain is a [[GitHub\|GH]]-[https://docs.github.com/en/pages Pages] site. Most pages in the domain are <code>no[[JavaScript\|script]]</code>-friendly, though.

	If you're looking for a Linux article, see [[User:Rudxain/Unix\|my page on Unix]].		If you're looking for a Linux article, see [[User:Rudxain/Unix\|my page on Unix]].

	BTW, I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources\|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote>		BTW, I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources\|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote>

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:09, 17 April 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[https://rudxain.github.io/ Website] (includes contact info and bio). Note: The entire domain is a [[GitHub\|GH]]-[https://docs.github.com/en/pages Pages] site. Most pages in the domain are <code>no[[JavaScript\|script]]</code>-friendly, though.		[https://rudxain.github.io/ Website] (includes contact info and bio). Note: The entire domain is a [[GitHub\|GH]]-[https://docs.github.com/en/pages Pages] site. Most pages in the domain are <code>no[[JavaScript\|script]]</code>-friendly, though.

	I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources\|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote>		If you're looking for a Linux article, see [[User:Rudxain/Unix\|my page on Unix]].

			BTW, I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources\|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote>