User talk:InTransparencyWeTrust - Revision history

Mr Pollo: /* Cyber truck article */ Reply

2025-08-16T13:35:30Z

Cyber truck article: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:35, 16 August 2025
Line 47:		Line 47:

	:Hi, that makes more sense; and also condemning this "stunt". Included it just for the case it would be real, you never know, America right, but yeah good that this is not real. Thank you for deleting the article, putting it right next to the artist in the trash bin. [[User:InTransparencyWeTrust\|InTransparencyWeTrust]] ([[User talk:InTransparencyWeTrust\|talk]]) 13:29, 16 August 2025 (UTC)		:Hi, that makes more sense; and also condemning this "stunt". Included it just for the case it would be real, you never know, America right, but yeah good that this is not real. Thank you for deleting the article, putting it right next to the artist in the trash bin. [[User:InTransparencyWeTrust\|InTransparencyWeTrust]] ([[User talk:InTransparencyWeTrust\|talk]]) 13:29, 16 August 2025 (UTC)
			::You’re welcome! [[User:Mr Pollo\|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo\|talk]]) 13:35, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

InTransparencyWeTrust: /* Cyber truck article */ Reply

2025-08-16T13:29:52Z

Cyber truck article: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:29, 16 August 2025
Line 42:		Line 42:
	:Hello, thanks for reaching out and feel free to reach out to one of the moderators, as you want to speak to someone in private. You can see the list of them here: [https://wiki.rossmanngroup.com/wiki/Special:ListUsers?username=&group=sysop&wpsubmit=&wpFormIdentifier=mw-listusers-form&limit=1000 (list of moderators)] [[User:InTransparencyWeTrust\|InTransparencyWeTrust]] ([[User talk:InTransparencyWeTrust\|talk]]) 13:37, 3 April 2025 (UTC)		:Hello, thanks for reaching out and feel free to reach out to one of the moderators, as you want to speak to someone in private. You can see the list of them here: [https://wiki.rossmanngroup.com/wiki/Special:ListUsers?username=&group=sysop&wpsubmit=&wpFormIdentifier=mw-listusers-form&limit=1000 (list of moderators)] [[User:InTransparencyWeTrust\|InTransparencyWeTrust]] ([[User talk:InTransparencyWeTrust\|talk]]) 13:37, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

	== Cyber truck article ==		==Cyber truck article==

	Hello! I’m a little skeptical about [[Tesla_shuts_down_car_on_the_middle_of_the_highway_over_legal_dispute_with_the_owner\|this article you made]], as many people think the cyber truck incident is a publicity stunt for the rapper and his new song. https://www.reddit.com/r/CyberStuck/comments/1mmbq9w/comment/n7x66rd/ [[User:Mr Pollo\|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo\|talk]]) 22:53, 11 August 2025 (UTC)		Hello! I’m a little skeptical about [[Tesla_shuts_down_car_on_the_middle_of_the_highway_over_legal_dispute_with_the_owner\|this article you made]], as many people think the cyber truck incident is a publicity stunt for the rapper and his new song. https://www.reddit.com/r/CyberStuck/comments/1mmbq9w/comment/n7x66rd/ [[User:Mr Pollo\|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo\|talk]]) 22:53, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

			:Hi, that makes more sense; and also condemning this "stunt". Included it just for the case it would be real, you never know, America right, but yeah good that this is not real. Thank you for deleting the article, putting it right next to the artist in the trash bin. [[User:InTransparencyWeTrust\|InTransparencyWeTrust]] ([[User talk:InTransparencyWeTrust\|talk]]) 13:29, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

Mr Pollo: /* Cyber truck article */ new section

2025-08-11T22:53:52Z

Cyber truck article: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:53, 11 August 2025
Line 41:		Line 41:

	:Hello, thanks for reaching out and feel free to reach out to one of the moderators, as you want to speak to someone in private. You can see the list of them here: [https://wiki.rossmanngroup.com/wiki/Special:ListUsers?username=&group=sysop&wpsubmit=&wpFormIdentifier=mw-listusers-form&limit=1000 (list of moderators)] [[User:InTransparencyWeTrust\|InTransparencyWeTrust]] ([[User talk:InTransparencyWeTrust\|talk]]) 13:37, 3 April 2025 (UTC)		:Hello, thanks for reaching out and feel free to reach out to one of the moderators, as you want to speak to someone in private. You can see the list of them here: [https://wiki.rossmanngroup.com/wiki/Special:ListUsers?username=&group=sysop&wpsubmit=&wpFormIdentifier=mw-listusers-form&limit=1000 (list of moderators)] [[User:InTransparencyWeTrust\|InTransparencyWeTrust]] ([[User talk:InTransparencyWeTrust\|talk]]) 13:37, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

			== Cyber truck article ==

			Hello! I’m a little skeptical about [[Tesla_shuts_down_car_on_the_middle_of_the_highway_over_legal_dispute_with_the_owner\|this article you made]], as many people think the cyber truck incident is a publicity stunt for the rapper and his new song. https://www.reddit.com/r/CyberStuck/comments/1mmbq9w/comment/n7x66rd/ [[User:Mr Pollo\|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo\|talk]]) 22:53, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

InTransparencyWeTrust at 13:38, 3 April 2025

2025-04-03T13:38:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:38, 3 April 2025
Line 40:		Line 40:
	Please let me know whats possible, and thank you in advance. [[User:Snider4881\|Snider4881]] ([[User talk:Snider4881\|talk]]) 21:03, 25 March 2025 (UTC)		Please let me know whats possible, and thank you in advance. [[User:Snider4881\|Snider4881]] ([[User talk:Snider4881\|talk]]) 21:03, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

	:Hello, thanks for reaching out and feel free to reach out to one of the moderators, as you want to speak to someone in private. You can see the list of them here:		:Hello, thanks for reaching out and feel free to reach out to one of the moderators, as you want to speak to someone in private. You can see the list of them here: [https://wiki.rossmanngroup.com/wiki/Special:ListUsers?username=&group=sysop&wpsubmit=&wpFormIdentifier=mw-listusers-form&limit=1000 (list of moderators)] [[User:InTransparencyWeTrust\|InTransparencyWeTrust]] ([[User talk:InTransparencyWeTrust\|talk]]) 13:37, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
	:[https://wiki.rossmanngroup.com/wiki/Special:ListUsers?username=&group=sysop&wpsubmit=&wpFormIdentifier=mw-listusers-form&limit=1000 (list of moderators)]
	:[[User:InTransparencyWeTrust\|InTransparencyWeTrust]] ([[User talk:InTransparencyWeTrust\|talk]]) 13:37, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

InTransparencyWeTrust: /* Contacting about a potentual post i am unsure if i should add? */ Reply

2025-04-03T13:37:10Z

Contacting about a potentual post i am unsure if i should add?: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:37, 3 April 2025
Line 28:		Line 28:
	:Articles about legislation in countries are more than welcome, that is also where the [[:Category:Legislation\|legislation category]] is for. For now I do not see the need to create country legislation articles, as there are not enough articles to back those up yet. I was quite strict on the creation of the country pages, as they invited a lot of content unrelated to the wiki, so that is why articles on consumer protection agencies and initiatives are much more preferred than generic country articles. But I do get the point of collecting legislation regions are subject to, that is also why I started on creating region categories for legislation. [[User:InTransparencyWeTrust\|InTransparencyWeTrust]] ([[User talk:InTransparencyWeTrust\|talk]]) 17:21, 4 March 2025 (UTC)		:Articles about legislation in countries are more than welcome, that is also where the [[:Category:Legislation\|legislation category]] is for. For now I do not see the need to create country legislation articles, as there are not enough articles to back those up yet. I was quite strict on the creation of the country pages, as they invited a lot of content unrelated to the wiki, so that is why articles on consumer protection agencies and initiatives are much more preferred than generic country articles. But I do get the point of collecting legislation regions are subject to, that is also why I started on creating region categories for legislation. [[User:InTransparencyWeTrust\|InTransparencyWeTrust]] ([[User talk:InTransparencyWeTrust\|talk]]) 17:21, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

	== Contacting about a potentual post i am unsure if i should add? ==		==Contacting about a potentual post i am unsure if i should add?==

	Hello, i hope who ever reads this is well and doing well.		Hello, i hope who ever reads this is well and doing well.
Line 39:		Line 39:

	Please let me know whats possible, and thank you in advance. [[User:Snider4881\|Snider4881]] ([[User talk:Snider4881\|talk]]) 21:03, 25 March 2025 (UTC)		Please let me know whats possible, and thank you in advance. [[User:Snider4881\|Snider4881]] ([[User talk:Snider4881\|talk]]) 21:03, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

			:Hello, thanks for reaching out and feel free to reach out to one of the moderators, as you want to speak to someone in private. You can see the list of them here:
			:[https://wiki.rossmanngroup.com/wiki/Special:ListUsers?username=&group=sysop&wpsubmit=&wpFormIdentifier=mw-listusers-form&limit=1000 (list of moderators)]
			:[[User:InTransparencyWeTrust\|InTransparencyWeTrust]] ([[User talk:InTransparencyWeTrust\|talk]]) 13:37, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

InTransparencyWeTrust: add info of user who commented

2025-04-03T13:36:06Z

add info of user who commented

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:36, 3 April 2025
Line 38:		Line 38:
	It involves disability discrimination related to physical disabilities and testing towards sold study and certification pacck to me with statement of support, but two years of run around with none provided since 2023. I am unsure if posting this here is appropriate, and as such i was hoping to speak with a moderator on the matter privately first to remain anonymous, and sanity check my best course of action before i post something that could hurt my potential case towards holding said company liable.		It involves disability discrimination related to physical disabilities and testing towards sold study and certification pacck to me with statement of support, but two years of run around with none provided since 2023. I am unsure if posting this here is appropriate, and as such i was hoping to speak with a moderator on the matter privately first to remain anonymous, and sanity check my best course of action before i post something that could hurt my potential case towards holding said company liable.

	Please let me know whats possible, and thank you in advance.		Please let me know whats possible, and thank you in advance. [[User:Snider4881\|Snider4881]] ([[User talk:Snider4881\|talk]]) 21:03, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Snider4881: /* Contacting about a potentual post i am unsure if i should add? */ new section

2025-03-25T21:03:45Z

Contacting about a potentual post i am unsure if i should add?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:03, 25 March 2025
Line 27:		Line 27:

	:Articles about legislation in countries are more than welcome, that is also where the [[:Category:Legislation\|legislation category]] is for. For now I do not see the need to create country legislation articles, as there are not enough articles to back those up yet. I was quite strict on the creation of the country pages, as they invited a lot of content unrelated to the wiki, so that is why articles on consumer protection agencies and initiatives are much more preferred than generic country articles. But I do get the point of collecting legislation regions are subject to, that is also why I started on creating region categories for legislation. [[User:InTransparencyWeTrust\|InTransparencyWeTrust]] ([[User talk:InTransparencyWeTrust\|talk]]) 17:21, 4 March 2025 (UTC)		:Articles about legislation in countries are more than welcome, that is also where the [[:Category:Legislation\|legislation category]] is for. For now I do not see the need to create country legislation articles, as there are not enough articles to back those up yet. I was quite strict on the creation of the country pages, as they invited a lot of content unrelated to the wiki, so that is why articles on consumer protection agencies and initiatives are much more preferred than generic country articles. But I do get the point of collecting legislation regions are subject to, that is also why I started on creating region categories for legislation. [[User:InTransparencyWeTrust\|InTransparencyWeTrust]] ([[User talk:InTransparencyWeTrust\|talk]]) 17:21, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

			== Contacting about a potentual post i am unsure if i should add? ==

			Hello, i hope who ever reads this is well and doing well.

			There is a potential legal matter i wish to raise about a certification company and would like to know how i can speak with some one privity and securely on the matter?

			Background:

			It involves disability discrimination related to physical disabilities and testing towards sold study and certification pacck to me with statement of support, but two years of run around with none provided since 2023. I am unsure if posting this here is appropriate, and as such i was hoping to speak with a moderator on the matter privately first to remain anonymous, and sanity check my best course of action before i post something that could hurt my potential case towards holding said company liable.

			Please let me know whats possible, and thank you in advance.

InTransparencyWeTrust: already discussing on a talk page

2025-03-07T09:04:37Z

already discussing on a talk page

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:04, 7 March 2025
Line 27:		Line 27:

	:Articles about legislation in countries are more than welcome, that is also where the [[:Category:Legislation\|legislation category]] is for. For now I do not see the need to create country legislation articles, as there are not enough articles to back those up yet. I was quite strict on the creation of the country pages, as they invited a lot of content unrelated to the wiki, so that is why articles on consumer protection agencies and initiatives are much more preferred than generic country articles. But I do get the point of collecting legislation regions are subject to, that is also why I started on creating region categories for legislation. [[User:InTransparencyWeTrust\|InTransparencyWeTrust]] ([[User talk:InTransparencyWeTrust\|talk]]) 17:21, 4 March 2025 (UTC)		:Articles about legislation in countries are more than welcome, that is also where the [[:Category:Legislation\|legislation category]] is for. For now I do not see the need to create country legislation articles, as there are not enough articles to back those up yet. I was quite strict on the creation of the country pages, as they invited a lot of content unrelated to the wiki, so that is why articles on consumer protection agencies and initiatives are much more preferred than generic country articles. But I do get the point of collecting legislation regions are subject to, that is also why I started on creating region categories for legislation. [[User:InTransparencyWeTrust\|InTransparencyWeTrust]] ([[User talk:InTransparencyWeTrust\|talk]]) 17:21, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

	~~== Re: Signal Data Collection ==~~
	[[User:InTransparencyWeTrust\|@InTransparencyWeTrust]] I've replied at https://wiki.rossmanngroup.com/index.php?title=Talk:Signal_Data_Collection. [[Special:Contributions/131.93.221.242\|131.93.221.242]] 01:25, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

131.93.221.242 at 01:25, 7 March 2025

2025-03-07T01:25:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:25, 7 March 2025
Line 27:		Line 27:

	:Articles about legislation in countries are more than welcome, that is also where the [[:Category:Legislation\|legislation category]] is for. For now I do not see the need to create country legislation articles, as there are not enough articles to back those up yet. I was quite strict on the creation of the country pages, as they invited a lot of content unrelated to the wiki, so that is why articles on consumer protection agencies and initiatives are much more preferred than generic country articles. But I do get the point of collecting legislation regions are subject to, that is also why I started on creating region categories for legislation. [[User:InTransparencyWeTrust\|InTransparencyWeTrust]] ([[User talk:InTransparencyWeTrust\|talk]]) 17:21, 4 March 2025 (UTC)		:Articles about legislation in countries are more than welcome, that is also where the [[:Category:Legislation\|legislation category]] is for. For now I do not see the need to create country legislation articles, as there are not enough articles to back those up yet. I was quite strict on the creation of the country pages, as they invited a lot of content unrelated to the wiki, so that is why articles on consumer protection agencies and initiatives are much more preferred than generic country articles. But I do get the point of collecting legislation regions are subject to, that is also why I started on creating region categories for legislation. [[User:InTransparencyWeTrust\|InTransparencyWeTrust]] ([[User talk:InTransparencyWeTrust\|talk]]) 17:21, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

			== Re: Signal Data Collection ==
			[[User:InTransparencyWeTrust\|@InTransparencyWeTrust]] I've replied at https://wiki.rossmanngroup.com/index.php?title=Talk:Signal_Data_Collection. [[Special:Contributions/131.93.221.242\|131.93.221.242]] 01:25, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

InTransparencyWeTrust: /* Country articles */ Reply

2025-03-04T17:21:59Z

Country articles: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:21, 4 March 2025
Line 20:		Line 20:
	::::Sounds good, I just wanted to make sure you had the wiki contributor role if you were on there as you have been doing a lot of work on the wiki. [[User:Kostas\|Kostas]] ([[User talk:Kostas\|talk]]) 20:29, 22 February 2025 (UTC)		::::Sounds good, I just wanted to make sure you had the wiki contributor role if you were on there as you have been doing a lot of work on the wiki. [[User:Kostas\|Kostas]] ([[User talk:Kostas\|talk]]) 20:29, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

	== Country articles ==		==Country articles==

	Hi, I've been looking over the United Kingdom article that popped up, and have been considering its role, or the role of articles like it, on the wiki. In my view, as we already accept the inclusion of agencies such as the FCC or other legislative/public bodies which have an influence on how consumer protections are defined or enforced, it might be appropriate to have an article titled 'Government of the United kingdom' (and other similar articles, perhaps the US might have federal and state ones) as an article for things about decisions directly taken by the UK govt (e.g. a link to the page for the apple icloud thing, but probably not that one about the guy at the airport as that's more of a civil rights thing than a consumer rights thing). This could potentially act as a hub for other UK government consumer organisations e.g. the CMA, as well as discussing legislation passed and actions taken by the UK government which relate to consumer protection. It would fit in as a tier 2 'entity' article.		Hi, I've been looking over the United Kingdom article that popped up, and have been considering its role, or the role of articles like it, on the wiki. In my view, as we already accept the inclusion of agencies such as the FCC or other legislative/public bodies which have an influence on how consumer protections are defined or enforced, it might be appropriate to have an article titled 'Government of the United kingdom' (and other similar articles, perhaps the US might have federal and state ones) as an article for things about decisions directly taken by the UK govt (e.g. a link to the page for the apple icloud thing, but probably not that one about the guy at the airport as that's more of a civil rights thing than a consumer rights thing). This could potentially act as a hub for other UK government consumer organisations e.g. the CMA, as well as discussing legislation passed and actions taken by the UK government which relate to consumer protection. It would fit in as a tier 2 'entity' article.

	I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on this? [[User:Keith\|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith\|talk]]) 15:24, 4 March 2025 (UTC)		I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on this? [[User:Keith\|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith\|talk]]) 15:24, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

			:Articles about legislation in countries are more than welcome, that is also where the [[:Category:Legislation\|legislation category]] is for. For now I do not see the need to create country legislation articles, as there are not enough articles to back those up yet. I was quite strict on the creation of the country pages, as they invited a lot of content unrelated to the wiki, so that is why articles on consumer protection agencies and initiatives are much more preferred than generic country articles. But I do get the point of collecting legislation regions are subject to, that is also why I started on creating region categories for legislation. [[User:InTransparencyWeTrust\|InTransparencyWeTrust]] ([[User talk:InTransparencyWeTrust\|talk]]) 17:21, 4 March 2025 (UTC)