User talk:Mrmox - Revision history

Kostas at 14:35, 9 February 2025

2025-02-09T14:35:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:35, 9 February 2025
Line 8:		Line 8:

	:Repling to what you wrote on your user page @[[User:Mrmox\|Mrmox]]		:Repling to what you wrote on your user page @[[User:Mrmox\|Mrmox]]
	:> whole license text and I took a screen shot at that point.		: <blockquote> whole license text and I took a screen shot at that point.</blockquote>
	:This would be a good inclusion to the article.		:This would be a good inclusion to the article.
	:> I wish I could point at where the whole license text could be viewed but the Google Play Store entry does not have it, only a few bullet "ASSURANCES" like Your Data is Encrypted In Transit etc.		: <blockquote> I wish I could point at where the whole license text could be viewed but the Google Play Store entry does not have it, only a few bullet "ASSURANCES" like Your Data is Encrypted In Transit etc.</blockquote>
	:This is also a good canditate to document and add. The fact that the terms are not easy to find is an issue in itself.		:This is also a good canditate to document and add. The fact that the terms are not easy to find is an issue in itself.
	:> my use of chatGPT was for a "second opinion" that the language was such that they could do anything with your data including sell it. For this purpose (second opinion) it strikes me that making any edits to what "it" said amounts to dishonesty or distortion.		:<blockquote>my use of chatGPT was for a "second opinion" that the language was such that they could do anything with your data including sell it. For this purpose (second opinion) it strikes me that making any edits to what "it" said amounts to dishonesty or distortion.</blockquote>
	:We would like to avoid having unedited LLM produced text in the articles. It would be preferable to add what you can to the best of your ability and let others add on to it. I have removed that interaction from the page for now but if you use it as a basis to write something easier to read you edited/verified you would be welcome to do so. [[User:Kostas\|Kostas]] ([[User talk:Kostas\|talk]]) 14:34, 9 February 2025 (UTC)		:We would like to avoid having unedited LLM produced text in the articles. It would be preferable to add what you can to the best of your ability and let others add on to it. I have removed that interaction from the page for now but if you use it as a basis to write something easier to read you edited/verified you would be welcome to do so. [[User:Kostas\|Kostas]] ([[User talk:Kostas\|talk]]) 14:34, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

Kostas: /* On mercury insurance */ Reply

2025-02-09T14:34:38Z

On mercury insurance: Reply

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-== On mercury insurance ==
+==On mercury insurance==
 Thank you for the guidance.  As you know aps can be insidious and this one is designed with a one-use paradigm where they send you a code to run it.  It has been 7 months since I used it but my best recollection is that AFTER entering the code is when you are presented with the whole license text and I took a screen shot at that point.  I wish I could point at where the whole license text could be viewed but the Google Play Store entry does not have it, only a few bullet "ASSURANCES" like Your Data is Encrypted In Transit etc.  Since the license text is hard to parse for humans, I initially sought validation for my interpretation in a reddit post but no one there had the skills.  So my use of chatGPT was for a "second opinion" that the language was such that they could do anything with your data including sell it.  For this purpose (second opinion) it strikes me that making any edits to what "it" said amounts to dishonesty or distortion.
@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 Would adding any of this to the reply count towards being more complete?  Thanks. [[User:Kostas|Kostas]] ([[User talk:Kostas|talk]]) 14:27, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

Kostas: /* On mercury insurance */ new section

2025-02-09T14:27:18Z

On mercury insurance: new section

New page

== On mercury insurance ==

Thank you for the guidance. As you know aps can be insidious and this one is designed with a one-use paradigm where they send you a code to run it. It has been 7 months since I used it but my best recollection is that AFTER entering the code is when you are presented with the whole license text and I took a screen shot at that point. I wish I could point at where the whole license text could be viewed but the Google Play Store entry does not have it, only a few bullet "ASSURANCES" like Your Data is Encrypted In Transit etc. Since the license text is hard to parse for humans, I initially sought validation for my interpretation in a reddit post but no one there had the skills. So my use of chatGPT was for a "second opinion" that the language was such that they could do anything with your data including sell it. For this purpose (second opinion) it strikes me that making any edits to what "it" said amounts to dishonesty or distortion.

BTW the app is not for CLAIMS, it is screening you to be able to BUY the insurance in the first place, guiding you to take exterior pictures of your house and inside of your HVAC and water heater installation manufacture dates.

Would adding any of this to the reply count towards being more complete? Thanks. [[User:Kostas|Kostas]] ([[User talk:Kostas|talk]]) 14:27, 9 February 2025 (UTC)