Talk:List of devices requiring account for initial setup: Difference between revisions
response |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
O_O What? Where? You mean the intro? I've specifically written it in a more relaxed tone, but improper language? I don't even see where and I've certainly keeped myself from using "inflammatory language" as in guidelines. I can't support the intro with sources as it is more like a short parable to inspire the reader. | O_O What? Where? You mean the intro? I've specifically written it in a more relaxed tone, but improper language? I don't even see where and I've certainly keeped myself from using "inflammatory language" as in guidelines. I can't support the intro with sources as it is more like a short parable to inspire the reader. | ||
Assumptions and hearsay - I've tried to support the list with sources, can you point where? Maybe can you add a [citation needed] where you feel it's needed? [[User:Konradmb|Konradmb]] ([[User talk:Konradmb|talk]]) 02:20, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | Assumptions and hearsay - I've tried to support the list with sources, can you point where? Maybe can you add a [citation needed] where you feel it's needed? [[User:Konradmb|Konradmb]] ([[User talk:Konradmb|talk]]) 02:20, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
I think "improper language" refers to how flavorful some of the text in the page is. Remember that this is a wiki, so an effort should be made to keep language more passive and objective. A short parable works well in a persuasive argument, but this supposed to be a more strictly informative document. Similarly, without sources, the scenarios outlined in the introductory paragraph come off as more anecdotal than factual; which deviates from the page being a source with reliable documentation. | |||