Jump to content

Filmora lifetime licenses terminated: Difference between revisions

From Consumer_Action_Taskforce
mNo edit summary
m Add ids to refs to deduplicate
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Incomplete}}
{{Incomplete}}


''Wondershare, the company behind '''Filmora''', changed its licensing policy, causing controversy among users. Originally, '''lifetime licenses''' promised unlimited access to future updates. However, Wondershare later restricted these licenses, requiring users to pay for major updates instead.''
'''[[Wondershare]]''', the company behind '''[[Filmora]]''', changed its licensing policy, causing controversy among users. Originally, lifetime licenses promised unlimited access to future updates. However, Wondershare later restricted these licenses, requiring users to pay for major updates instead.  


==Background==
==Background==
''Information about the product/service history to provide the neccessary context surrounding the incident''
'''Filmora''' is a video editing software designed for content creators and videographers. The software initially offered lifetime licenses, which were priced at $59.99, $20 more than the $39.99/year subscription.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Smith |first=Ernie |date=3 Jan 2023 |title=Filmora lifetime license controvery |url=https://midrange.tedium.co/issues/filmora-lifetime-license-controversy/ |access-date=1 Mar 2025 |website=MidRange}}</ref> That meant that the lifetime license was cheaper than going for the yearly subscription twice.


==''[Incident]''==
==Terminating lifetime licenses==
''In 2022, Wondershare altered its licensing terms, effectively invalidating the '''lifetime''' nature of these licenses. Instead of providing continuous updates, Wondershare restricted major upgrades (e.g., from '''Filmora 9 to Filmora 10''') to users with '''subscription-based''' plans or those willing to pay an '''additional upgrade fee'''. This decision led to a significant backlash from customers who had purchased a '''lifetime license''', believing they were entitled to all future versions at no extra cost.''
In 2022, Wondershare altered its licensing terms, effectively invalidating the lifetime nature of these licenses. Instead of providing continuous updates, Wondershare restricted major upgrades (e.g., from Filmora 9 to Filmora 10) to users with subscription-based plans or those willing to pay an additional upgrade fee. This decision led to a significant backlash from customers who had purchased a lifetime license, believing they were entitled to all future versions at no extra cost.


''Wondershare initially justified the change by claiming that the lifetime license only covered updates within the same major version (e.g., all updates within '''Filmora 9.x''' but not Filmora 10). However, this contradicted the original understanding many users had when purchasing the product.''
Wondershare initially justified the change by claiming that the lifetime license only covered updates within the same major version (e.g., all updates within Filmora 9.x but not Filmora 10). However, this contradicted the original understanding many users had when purchasing the product.


===[Company]'s response===
===Wondershare's response===
[https://x.com/Filmora_Editor/status/1609180413188096005 -]
The company directly addressed the users of the lifetime license users, putting out a statement with a public apology for the caused confusion.<ref>{{Cite web |date=31 Dec 2022 |title=Wondershare FINALLY makes things right for their old lifetime license users!! |url=https://www.reddit.com/r/Filmora/comments/zzwczm/wondershare_finally_makes_things_right_for_their/ |archive-date= |access-date=1 Mar 2025 |via=Reddit}}</ref> In that same statement, two compensation options are offered. Customers get a free upgrade to the latest version, but it does not state about future updates. By the specific language used, in this case "upgrade", the earlier lifetime updating does not seem applicable anymore after this. In the case that customers had already payed, they could get a full refund if they responded within a month, otherwise the company assumes they opt for getting additional software (priced at $99) as a way of compensation.
 
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMIIwQZMFLE copyright strike] [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xy1HiWGchMg&t=0s 2]
 
 
''If applicable add the proposed solution to the issues by the company.''


==Lawsuit==
==Lawsuit==
''If applicable add any information regarding litigation around the incident here.''
In February 2024, there was a related [[class action]] lawsuit filed, alleging that Wondershare lures consumers into automatically renewing subscriptions without making proper disclosures or obtaining customer consent.<ref>{{Cite web |last=McCroskey |first=Kelsey |date=26 February 2024 |title=Wondershare Hit with Lawsuit Over Alleged Subscription Auto-Renewal Practices |url=https://www.classaction.org/news/wondershare-hit-with-lawsuit-over-alleged-subscription-auto-renewal-practices |access-date=1 Mar 2025 |website=ClassAction.org}}</ref><ref>https://dockets.justia.com/docket/california/cacdce/2:2024cv01314/915366</ref> The court order established a 90-day window for settlement negotiations, and the case was dismissed subject to settlement consummation.<ref>https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/cacdce/2:2024cv01314/915366/42</ref>


=== Consumer Response ===
==Consumer response==


* '''Deceptive Advertising:''' Numerous users accused Wondershare of false advertising regarding the lifetime licenses.
*'''Deceptive Advertising:''' Numerous users accused Wondershare of false advertising regarding the lifetime licenses.
* '''Erosion of Trust:''' Previous trust in Wondershare's products evaporated, leaving customers wary of future purchases from the company.
*'''Erosion of Trust:''' Previous trust in Wondershare's products evaporated, leaving customers wary of future purchases from the company.
* '''Refund Requests:''' There was a significant demand for refunds from those who held "lifetime" licenses, claiming the product did not meet the expectations set by its marketing.
*'''Refund Requests:''' There was a significant demand for refunds from those who held "lifetime" licenses, claiming the product did not meet the expectations set by its marketing.


===Rebuttal===
''The response of the company or counterclaims.''
===Outcome===
''The outcome, if any, of the suit.''


==Consumer response==
Videos by Daniel Batal: <ref>{{Cite web |last=Batal |first=Daniel |date=22 Dec 2022 |title=Filmora Just CANCELLED our Lifetime Licenses. |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bm90xW40c3A |via=YouTube |ref=Batal-video-1}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Batal |first=Daniel |date=31 Dec 2022 |title=Filmora Told YouTube To Remove My Video. |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMIIwQZMFLE |via=YouTube |ref=Batal-video-2}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Batal |first=Daniel |date=2 Jan 2023 |title=Filmora Buckles Under Public Pressure! (but issues a threat) |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xy1HiWGchMg |via=YouTube |ref=Batal-video-3}}</ref>
''Summary and key issues of prevailing sentiment from the consumers and commentators that can be documented via articles, emails to support, reviews and forum posts.''


Videos by Louis Rossmann: <ref>{{Cite web |last=Rossmann |first=Louis |date=2 Jan 2023 |title=Filmora/Wondershare is a bad company for more reasons than you think |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKX0LjGBBqo |via=YouTube}}</ref>


==References==
==References==
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKX0LjGBBqo Filmora/Wondershare is a bad company for more reasons than you think - YouTube]
<references />
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bm90xW40c3A Filmora Just CANCELLED our Lifetime Licenses.]
[[Category:Filmora]]
[[Category:''Name of associated product, service, website, software, product line or company goes here'']]
[[Category:Articles based on videos]]

Latest revision as of 08:33, 18 March 2025

⚠️ Article status notice: This article has been marked as incomplete

This article needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues.

This notice will be removed once sufficient documentation has been added to establish the systemic nature of these issues. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, visit the discord and post to the #appeals channel.

Learn more ▼


Wondershare, the company behind Filmora, changed its licensing policy, causing controversy among users. Originally, lifetime licenses promised unlimited access to future updates. However, Wondershare later restricted these licenses, requiring users to pay for major updates instead.

Background[edit | edit source]

Filmora is a video editing software designed for content creators and videographers. The software initially offered lifetime licenses, which were priced at $59.99, $20 more than the $39.99/year subscription.[1] That meant that the lifetime license was cheaper than going for the yearly subscription twice.

Terminating lifetime licenses[edit | edit source]

In 2022, Wondershare altered its licensing terms, effectively invalidating the lifetime nature of these licenses. Instead of providing continuous updates, Wondershare restricted major upgrades (e.g., from Filmora 9 to Filmora 10) to users with subscription-based plans or those willing to pay an additional upgrade fee. This decision led to a significant backlash from customers who had purchased a lifetime license, believing they were entitled to all future versions at no extra cost.

Wondershare initially justified the change by claiming that the lifetime license only covered updates within the same major version (e.g., all updates within Filmora 9.x but not Filmora 10). However, this contradicted the original understanding many users had when purchasing the product.

Wondershare's response[edit | edit source]

The company directly addressed the users of the lifetime license users, putting out a statement with a public apology for the caused confusion.[2] In that same statement, two compensation options are offered. Customers get a free upgrade to the latest version, but it does not state about future updates. By the specific language used, in this case "upgrade", the earlier lifetime updating does not seem applicable anymore after this. In the case that customers had already payed, they could get a full refund if they responded within a month, otherwise the company assumes they opt for getting additional software (priced at $99) as a way of compensation.

Lawsuit[edit | edit source]

In February 2024, there was a related class action lawsuit filed, alleging that Wondershare lures consumers into automatically renewing subscriptions without making proper disclosures or obtaining customer consent.[3][4] The court order established a 90-day window for settlement negotiations, and the case was dismissed subject to settlement consummation.[5]

Consumer response[edit | edit source]

  • Deceptive Advertising: Numerous users accused Wondershare of false advertising regarding the lifetime licenses.
  • Erosion of Trust: Previous trust in Wondershare's products evaporated, leaving customers wary of future purchases from the company.
  • Refund Requests: There was a significant demand for refunds from those who held "lifetime" licenses, claiming the product did not meet the expectations set by its marketing.


Videos by Daniel Batal: [6][7][8]

Videos by Louis Rossmann: [9]

References[edit | edit source]

  1. Smith, Ernie (3 Jan 2023). "Filmora lifetime license controvery". MidRange. Retrieved 1 Mar 2025.
  2. "Wondershare FINALLY makes things right for their old lifetime license users!!". 31 Dec 2022. Retrieved 1 Mar 2025 – via Reddit.
  3. McCroskey, Kelsey (26 February 2024). "Wondershare Hit with Lawsuit Over Alleged Subscription Auto-Renewal Practices". ClassAction.org. Retrieved 1 Mar 2025.
  4. https://dockets.justia.com/docket/california/cacdce/2:2024cv01314/915366
  5. https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/cacdce/2:2024cv01314/915366/42
  6. Batal, Daniel (22 Dec 2022). "Filmora Just CANCELLED our Lifetime Licenses" – via YouTube.
  7. Batal, Daniel (31 Dec 2022). "Filmora Told YouTube To Remove My Video" – via YouTube.
  8. Batal, Daniel (2 Jan 2023). "Filmora Buckles Under Public Pressure! (but issues a threat)" – via YouTube.
  9. Rossmann, Louis (2 Jan 2023). "Filmora/Wondershare is a bad company for more reasons than you think" – via YouTube.