Sig Sauer: Difference between revisions

(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 20:

*A 2023 investigation by ''The Washington Post'' and ''The Trace'' found more than 100 people who say their P320 discharged with no trigger pressure; at least 80 of them were wounded as a result. At least 35 of the shootings are purported to have occurred with either post-2017 P320s with the updated design intended to address the drop firing problem, or older ones which had been updated by SIG Sauer.

*the striker assembly for the P320 has a part that was designed to be stamped, though initial models were mimmed to save on costs

*the FBI report on the ballistic performance of the M17(P320) mentions risk of Negligent/Accidental discharge being reasonable in a law enforcement role, despite this the P320 is commonly fielded by law enforcement agencies throughout the US

==Incidents==

This is a list of all consumer-protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the [[:Category:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|{{PAGENAME}} category]].

The 2025 Sig Sauer P320 manual adds a change specifying that users should not carry the firearm with a round in the chamber. This goes against many voices in the community of people who concealed carry as in a situation that warrants use of the firearm there is no guarantee that an individual will have the opportunity to rack the slide before firing. This is a new amendment to the manual that was not present in prior years and may be verified on the documentation page for the gun.

===Sheperis v. Sig Sauer, Inc. (''2017'')===

*[[wikipedia:SIG_Sauer_P320#Sheperis_v._Sig_Sauer,_Inc.|https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIG_Sauer_P320#Sheperis_v._Sig_Sauer,_Inc.]] (settled in 2018, on the grounds that the issue was rectified via voluntary trigger upgrade )

Line 43:

Line 46:

==External links==

*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIG_Sauer_P320#Lawsuits_regarding_P320 Lawsuits regarding P320 on Wikipedia]

*https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LfnhTYeVHHE

[[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]]

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 *A 2023 investigation by ''The Washington Post'' and ''The Trace'' found more than 100 people who say their P320 discharged with no trigger pressure; at least 80 of them were wounded as a result. At least 35 of the shootings are purported to have occurred with either post-2017 P320s with the updated design intended to address the drop firing problem, or older ones which had been updated by SIG Sauer.
 *the striker assembly for the P320 has a part that was designed to be stamped, though initial models were mimmed to save on costs
+*the FBI report on the ballistic performance of the M17(P320) mentions risk of Negligent/Accidental discharge being reasonable in a law enforcement role, despite this the P320 is commonly fielded by law enforcement agencies throughout the US
 ==Incidents==
 This is a list of all consumer-protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the [[:Category:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|{{PAGENAME}} category]].
+The 2025 Sig Sauer P320 manual adds a change specifying that users should not carry the firearm with a round in the chamber. This goes against many voices in the community of people who concealed carry as in a situation that warrants use of the firearm there is no guarantee that an individual will have the opportunity to rack the slide before firing. This is a new amendment to the manual that was not present in prior years and may be verified on the documentation page for the gun.
 ===Sheperis v. Sig Sauer, Inc. (''2017'')===
 *[[wikipedia:SIG_Sauer_P320#Sheperis_v._Sig_Sauer,_Inc.|https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIG_Sauer_P320#Sheperis_v._Sig_Sauer,_Inc.]] (settled in 2018, on the grounds that the issue was rectified via voluntary trigger upgrade )
@@ Line 43: / Line 46: @@
 ==External links==
 *[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIG_Sauer_P320#Lawsuits_regarding_P320 Lawsuits regarding P320 on Wikipedia]
+*https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LfnhTYeVHHE
 [[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]]