Robinhood Financial: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (14 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{InfoboxCompany | {{InfoboxCompany | ||
|Name=Robinhood Financial, LLC|Type=Subsidiary|Founded=2013|Industry=Financial Services|Official Website=http://robinhood.com/|Logo=Robinhood (company) logo.svg}} | |Name=Robinhood Financial, LLC|Type=Subsidiary|Founded=2013|Industry=Financial Services|Official Website=http://robinhood.com/|Logo=Robinhood (company) logo.svg}} | ||
*Democratizing: Removing fees and simplifying investing for | '''[[wikipedia:Robinhood_Markets|Robinhood Financial, LLC]],''' is a wholly-owned subsidiary of [[wikipedia:Robinhood_Markets|Robinhood Markets, Inc]]. The US app based brokerage company offers commission free stock and ETF trading ( exchange-traded funds ). Founded in 2013 by two former Stanford University room mates, the app was launched in 2015. Their mission is to democratize finance for all. | ||
==Consumer impact summary== | |||
===Mission statement=== | |||
*Democratizing: Removing fees and simplifying investing for individual investors.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=DCF Team |first=The |title=Mission Statement, Vision, & Core Values of Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) |url=https://dcfmodeling.com/blogs/vision/hood-mission-vision |website=dcfmodeling.com}}</ref> | |||
*Accessibility: Offering fractional shares, a mobile-first platform, and educational resources.<ref name=":0" /> | *Accessibility: Offering fractional shares, a mobile-first platform, and educational resources.<ref name=":0" /> | ||
| Line 12: | Line 13: | ||
*Inclusivity: Targeted young and less wealthy investors that historically were excluded from traditional brokerage services.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Boorstin |first=Julia |date=May 25, 2021 |title=Robinhood’s disruptive force: The good, the bad and the controversy |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/25/robinhoods-disruptive-trade-the-good-the-bad-and-the-controversy.html |website=CNBC.com}}</ref> | *Inclusivity: Targeted young and less wealthy investors that historically were excluded from traditional brokerage services.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Boorstin |first=Julia |date=May 25, 2021 |title=Robinhood’s disruptive force: The good, the bad and the controversy |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/25/robinhoods-disruptive-trade-the-good-the-bad-and-the-controversy.html |website=CNBC.com}}</ref> | ||
== | ===Business model=== | ||
== | Operates on a commission free trading model for individual investors. Generating revenue through: | ||
*Payment for order flow (PFOF): Selling customer trades to high frequency trading firms earning rebates for each trade. This accounts for a significant percentage of its revenue.<ref name=":5">{{Cite web |last=Goldfine |first=Jael |date=January 28, 2021 |title=Robinhood’s business model and backlash, explained |url=https://www.businessofbusiness.com/articles/robinhoods-business-model-and-backlash-explained/ |website=businessofbusiness.com}}</ref> | |||
*Robinhood Gold: Subscription service offering margin trading and advanced feature for five dollars a month.<ref name=":5" /> | |||
*Interest on cash and securities lending: Earning from idle cash in user accounts and lending shares to short sellers.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Cabral |first=Sarah |last2=LaCombe |first2=Amy |date=December 1, 2021 |title=Robinhood, Reddit, and GameStop: What Happened and What Should Happen Next? |url=https://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/business-ethics/resources/robinhood-reddit-and-gamestop-what-happened-and-what-should-happen-next/ |website=scu.edu}}</ref> | |||
Critics argue that PFOF creates a conflict of interest, as they may prioritize routing orders to the highest paying firms rather than ensuring the best execution for customers. | |||
===Tokenized shares=== | |||
:Robinhood's shares are blockchain-based representations of traditional stocks or private equities. Tokens mirror the price movements of the underlying assets but do not confer legal ownership of the actual shares. Instead, they function as synthetic derivatives, offering exposure to the asset’s value without traditional shareholder rights like voting or dividends.<ref name=":6">{{Cite web |last=Harris |first=Ainsley |date=July 14, 2025 |title=What are ‘tokenized’ stocks, and why are trading platforms like Robinhood offering them? |url=https://www.fastcompany.com/91364041/tokenized-stok-trading-platforms-robinhood |website=Fast Company}}</ref><ref name=":7">{{Cite web |last=O'Brient |first=Samuel |title=Robinhood has rolled out 'tokenized' stocks and ETFs. Here's what to know about the crypto-like assets. |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/what-is-tokenization-robinhood-openai-spacex-stocks-crypto-blockchain-hood-2025-7 |website=Business Insider}}</ref><ref name=":8">{{Cite web |last=Moukhtarzade |first=Darius |title=Turning Stocks into Tokens, Why its Cool but Complicated |url=https://www.21shares.com/en-us/research/turning-stocks-into-tokens-why-its-cool-but-complicated |website=21Shares}}</ref> | |||
;Backing mechanism | |||
:Actual shares are held in custody (for public stocks) or partners with brokers to back tokens with real securities. The tokens are synthetic claims tied to price performance, not equity for private companies.<ref name=":6" /><ref name=":8" /><ref name=":10">{{Cite web |title=Robinhood Faces Regulatory Scrutiny Over Tokenized Private Company Stock |url=https://www.ledgerinsights.com/robinhood-faces-regulatory-scrutiny-over-tokenized-private-company-stock/ |website=ledgerinsights.com}}</ref> | |||
;Trading | |||
:Tokenized shares trade 24 hours a day five days a week on Robinhood’s platform via Arbitrum, an Ethereum Layer-2 blockchain.<ref name=":9">{{Cite web |last=Patrick |first=Thompson |date=July 10, 2025 |title=Tokenized stocks explained: How Robinhood opened US markets |url=https://coingeek.com/tokenized-stocks-explained-how-robinhood-opened-us-markets/ |website=CoinGeek}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Mazza |first=Rosalia |date=July 5, 2025 |title=Robinhood Tokenization Push Redefines Market Hours and Investor Access |url=https://www.fintechweekly.com/magazine/articles/robinhood-tokenization-stock-trading-eu-arbitrum |website=FinTech Weekly}}</ref> | |||
;Access | |||
:Currently available only to EU users, these tokens allow fractional ownership and bypass cross-border brokerage hurdles.<ref name=":7" /><ref name=":9" /> | |||
;Regulatory status | |||
:Classified as derivatives under EU rules, not direct securities. Robinhood emphasizes transparency, but faces scrutiny over disclosures involving private companies.<ref name=":10" /><ref>{{Cite web |last=Fenton |first=Andrew |date=July 16, 2025 |title=Will Robinhood’s tokenized stocks REALLY take over the world? |url=https://cointelegraph.com/magazine/tokenized-stocks-take-over-world-robinhood-kraken-pros-cons-crypto/ |website=cointelegraph.com}}</ref> | |||
===Negative impacts=== | |||
====Misleading Practices and Lack of Transparency==== | |||
*Fined $65 million by the SEC in 2020 for failing to disclose how PFOF led to inferior trade execution prices, costing customers $34.1 million in aggregate. The platform claimed trades were "commission-free" but hid the true costs.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Fitzgerald |first=Maggie |date=December 17, 2020 |title=SEC charges Robinhood with misleading customers about how it makes money |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/17/sec-charges-robinhood-with-misleading-customers-about-how-it-makes-money.html |website=CNBC.com}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite web |date=December 17, 2020 |title=SEC Charges Robinhood Financial With Misleading Customers About Revenue Sources and Failing to Satisfy Duty of Best Execution |url=https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2020-321 |website=SEC.gov}}</ref> | |||
*Massachusetts regulators fined Robinhood $7.5 million in 2024 for using deceptive gamification tactics (e.g., digital confetti, scratch-off stock rewards) that encouraged risky trading without adequate investor protections.<ref name=":2">{{Cite web |last=Hill |first=Paul |date=February 12, 2024 |title=Game Over: Robinhood Pays $7.5 Million to Resolve “Gamification” Securities Violations |url=https://www.velaw.com/insights/game-over-robinhood-pays-7-5-million-to-resolve-gamification-securities-violations/ |website=velaw.com}}</ref> | |||
=====Systemic Compliance Failures===== | |||
*Paid $29.75 million in 2025 to settle the Finance Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) probes for failing to detect suspicious account activity, leaving customers vulnerable to hacking and fraud.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Stempel |first=Jonathan |date=March 7, 2025 |title=Robinhood paying $29.75 million to end US regulator's probes |url=https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/robinhood-paying-2975-million-end-us-regulators-probes-2025-03-07/ |website=Reuters.com}}</ref> | |||
*Fined $45 million in 2025 by the SEC for failing to safeguard customer data, leading to a 2021 breach exposing millions of users’ information.<ref>{{Cite web |date=January 13, 2025 |title=Two Robinhood Broker-Dealers to Pay $45 Million in Combined Penalties for Violating More Than 10 Separate Securities Law Provisions |url=https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2025-5 |website=SEC.gov}}</ref> | |||
=====Restricting Consumer Choice===== | |||
*During the 2021 they abruptly halted trading in meme stocks, citing clearinghouse deposit requirements. This left individual investors unable to capitalize on market movements while institutional traders faced fewer restrictions. Critics argued this violated consumer rights by favoring systemic stability over fair access.<ref name=":3">{{Cite web |last=Orcutt |first=Johnathan |date=February 25, 2021 |title=The Legal Impact: Robinhood |url=https://law.unh.edu/blog/2021/02/legal-impact-robinhood |website=unh.edu}}</ref><ref name=":4">{{Cite web |last=Cabral |first=Sarah |last2=LaCombe |first2=Amy |date=December 1, 2021 |title=Robinhood, Reddit, and GameStop: What Happened and What Should Happen Next? |url=https://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/business-ethics/resources/robinhood-reddit-and-gamestop-what-happened-and-what-should-happen-next/ |website=scu.edu}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Goodman |first=Lawrence |last2=Lofchie |first2=Steven |last3=Lumsdaine |first3=Robin |date=February 23, 2021 |title=Robinhood and GameStop: Essential Issues and Next Steps for Regulators and Investors |url=https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/02/23/robinhood-and-gamestop-essential-issues-and-next-steps-for-regulators-and-investors/ |website=harvard.edu}}</ref> | |||
=====Exploitation of Inexperienced Investors===== | |||
*Robinhood’s reliance on financial influencers (finfluencers) led to a $26 million FINRA fine in 2025 for failing to supervise misleading promotions (e.g., claims of "living financially free" from dividends).<ref>{{Cite web |last=Powell |first=Robin |date=March 24, 2025 |title=Robinhood Case Highlights Risks Posed by Finfluencers |url=https://www.ifa.com/articles/robinhood_case_highlights_risks_posed_finfluencers |website=ifa.com}}</ref> | |||
*The platform’s design prioritized engagement over fiduciary duty, pushing users toward frequent trading, a practice Massachusetts deemed a violation of its fiduciary rule.<ref name=":2" /> | |||
===Ongoing ethical and regulatory concerns=== | |||
====Conflicts of Interest==== | |||
Robinhood’s revenue model (e.g., PFOF, stock lending) often misaligned with customer best execution rights.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":4" /> | |||
====Arbitration Clauses==== | |||
Users are forced into mandatory arbitration, limiting their ability to seek legal redress.<ref name=":3" /> | |||
==Incidents== | |||
===Death of a trader=== | |||
In 2020 a user committed suicide after misinterpreted a negative balance due to poor UI design, leading to backlash over risk disclosures. | |||
===GameStop short squeeze=== | |||
''main article: [[GameStop Short Squeeze]]'' | |||
In 2021, decisions to restrict trading fueled accusations of market manipulation and hypocrisy due to it's 'for the people' branding. | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||