Talk:GrapheneOS: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→Relevancy discussion: Reply |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
::Yes - having a strict approach to sourcing will probably be neccesary to prevent the wiki from being flooded in this way. | ::Yes - having a strict approach to sourcing will probably be neccesary to prevent the wiki from being flooded in this way. | ||
::We should also consider what kinds of 'good' attributes are relevant to the wiki, as our relevancy criteria, at the moment, only really examine what kinds of negative attributes are relevant. Obviously it is beneficial for the consumer if a high-quality product is offered at a low price, but that shouldn't be sufficient for an article to appear on the wiki. Maybe we need to draw something up around the definition of 'new' consumer protection as defined in the [[Mission statement]]? [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 20:04, 16 August 2025 (UTC) | ::We should also consider what kinds of 'good' attributes are relevant to the wiki, as our relevancy criteria, at the moment, only really examine what kinds of negative attributes are relevant. Obviously it is beneficial for the consumer if a high-quality product is offered at a low price, but that shouldn't be sufficient for an article to appear on the wiki. Maybe we need to draw something up around the definition of 'new' consumer protection as defined in the [[Mission statement]]? [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 20:04, 16 August 2025 (UTC) | ||
:::I will draft up a proposal of the necessary requirements for this category of companies and products and include it here! [[User:Pancho|Pancho]] ([[User talk:Pancho|talk]]) 20:17, 16 August 2025 (UTC) | |||