Sig Sauer: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
add cat |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{InfoboxCompany | {{Incomplete|Issue 1=Needs clean up to conform to our standards}}{{InfoboxCompany | ||
| Name = {{PAGENAME}} | | Name = {{PAGENAME}} | ||
| Type =Private | | Type =Private | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
*Sig has been failing to address customer concern to some extent with the safety of their P320 and their M17 model of pistols. these are effectively the same firearm though for the civilian and military markets respectively. this has been brought to court rather frequently and culminated in at least several investigations. | *Sig has been failing to address customer concern to some extent with the safety of their P320 and their M17 model of pistols. these are effectively the same firearm though for the civilian and military markets respectively. this has been brought to court rather frequently and culminated in at least several investigations. | ||
*A 2023 investigation by ''The Washington Post'' and ''The Trace'' found more than 100 people who say their P320 discharged with no trigger pressure; at least 80 of them were wounded as a result. At least 35 of the shootings are purported to have occurred with either post-2017 P320s with the updated design intended to address the drop firing problem, or older ones which had been updated by SIG Sauer. | *A 2023 investigation by ''The Washington Post'' and ''The Trace'' found more than 100 people who say their P320 discharged with no trigger pressure; at least 80 of them were wounded as a result. At least 35 of the shootings are purported to have occurred with either post-2017 P320s with the updated design intended to address the drop firing problem, or older ones which had been updated by SIG Sauer. | ||
*the striker assembly for the P320 has a part that was designed to be stamped, though initial models were mimmed to save on costs | |||
*the FBI report on the ballistic performance of the M17(P320) mentions risk of Negligent/Accidental discharge being reasonable in a law enforcement role, despite this the P320 is commonly fielded by law enforcement agencies throughout the US | |||
==Incidents== | ==Incidents== | ||
This is a list of all consumer-protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the [[:Category:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|{{PAGENAME}} category]]. | This is a list of all consumer-protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the [[:Category:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|{{PAGENAME}} category]]. | ||
The 2025 Sig Sauer P320 manual adds a change specifying that users should not carry the firearm with a round in the chamber. This goes against many voices in the community of people who concealed carry as in a situation that warrants use of the firearm there is no guarantee that an individual will have the opportunity to rack the slide before firing. This is a new amendment to the manual that was not present in prior years and may be verified on the documentation page for the gun. | |||
===Sheperis v. Sig Sauer, Inc. (''2017'')=== | ===Sheperis v. Sig Sauer, Inc. (''2017'')=== | ||
*[[wikipedia:SIG_Sauer_P320#Sheperis_v._Sig_Sauer,_Inc.|https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIG_Sauer_P320#Sheperis_v._Sig_Sauer,_Inc.]] (settled in 2018, on the grounds that the issue was rectified via voluntary trigger upgrade ) | *[[wikipedia:SIG_Sauer_P320#Sheperis_v._Sig_Sauer,_Inc.|https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIG_Sauer_P320#Sheperis_v._Sig_Sauer,_Inc.]] (settled in 2018, on the grounds that the issue was rectified via voluntary trigger upgrade ) | ||
Short summary of the incident (could be the same as the summary preceding the article). | Short summary of the incident (could be the same as the summary preceding the article). | ||
===Hartley, et al. v. Sig Sauer, Inc. (''2018'')=== | ===Hartley, et al. v. Sig Sauer, Inc. (''2018'')=== | ||
*[[wikipedia:SIG_Sauer_P320#Hartley,_et_al._v._Sig_Sauer,_Inc.|https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIG_Sauer_P320#Hartley,_et_al._v._Sig_Sauer,_Inc.]](class action suit in February 2020, extended the voluntary trigger upgrade program and made Sig Sauer reimburse people whose firearms were unrepairable/were charged for the voluntary trigger upgrade. A class action settlement form is available on the SIG Sauer website.) | *[[wikipedia:SIG_Sauer_P320#Hartley,_et_al._v._Sig_Sauer,_Inc.|https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIG_Sauer_P320#Hartley,_et_al._v._Sig_Sauer,_Inc.]]([[class action]] suit in February 2020, extended the voluntary trigger upgrade program and made Sig Sauer reimburse people whose firearms were unrepairable/were charged for the voluntary trigger upgrade. A class action settlement form is available on the SIG Sauer website.) | ||
==Products== | ==Products== | ||
| Line 34: | Line 38: | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
*https://www. | *https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=LfnhTYeVHHE | ||
*https:// | *https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjEhgXAALL8 | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
| Line 42: | Line 46: | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIG_Sauer_P320#Lawsuits_regarding_P320 Lawsuits regarding P320 on Wikipedia] | *[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIG_Sauer_P320#Lawsuits_regarding_P320 Lawsuits regarding P320 on Wikipedia] | ||
*https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=LfnhTYeVHHE | |||
[[Category: | [[Category:Sig Sauer]] | ||