Talk:Roblox's problematic moderation: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 52: Line 52:
*https://www.instagram.com/reel/DNPKmm5MIOy/
*https://www.instagram.com/reel/DNPKmm5MIOy/
*https://www.instagram.com/reel/DNMF-foKilD/
*https://www.instagram.com/reel/DNMF-foKilD/
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DNS28FXRhxr/


==The issue of maintaining nuance while discussing the 'vigilante' terminations==
==The issue of maintaining nuance while discussing the 'vigilante' terminations==
Line 78: Line 80:


:Hi there, I just approved you so that you can add your edit! [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 05:04, 16 August 2025 (UTC)
:Hi there, I just approved you so that you can add your edit! [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 05:04, 16 August 2025 (UTC)
::Additionally, I was intentionally brief when it came to the actions of Ruben and Schlep considering I must question some of their ideology (I may not be a furry, but I don't hate them), but I did opt to use their content as references since their content has been valuable pieces of evidence pointing to these incidents.
::I did previously attempt to contact the individuals to see if they published any other evidence elsewhere that I could additionally share on the wiki, with zero response.  [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 05:15, 16 August 2025 (UTC)
Return to "Roblox's problematic moderation" page.