Lifetime license removal: Difference between revisions
Moar examples, some expansion. If we can get a 2nd reason added to */ Why it is a problem /*, remove the stub notice! |
→Added viability: products demanding recurring revenue don't mix well with customers who pay only once, possible root of lifetime license removal. It's my second time editing a wiki |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Why it is a problem== | ==Why it is a problem== | ||
=== Right to Own === | ===Right to Own=== | ||
The sale of these licenses are made with the expectation that the purchaser will forever retain access to this license. When these are revoked among a litany of reasons, via a multitude of methods, such as discontinuing the software or [[Retroactively amended purchase|retroactively amending the agreement]], it defies the [[Right to own|right to ownership]]. | The sale of these licenses are made with the expectation that the purchaser will forever retain access to this license. When these are revoked among a litany of reasons, via a multitude of methods, such as discontinuing the software or [[Retroactively amended purchase|retroactively amending the agreement]], it defies the [[Right to own|right to ownership]]. | ||
=== Viability === | |||
The viability of a lifetime license is dependent on the product's operational costs and its monetization plan. | |||
Products that require recurring operational costs for their necessary advertised functions (backend service upkeep, staff involvement, etc.) can't function on their own without income. Lifetime license users may be serviced at a loss compared to subscription-based users who meet the recurring revenue operational cost demand. The price difference between a lifetime license and a subscription-based license only offsets the threshold of when a lifetime subscription customer becomes unprofitable to service. | |||
==Examples<!-- Web search to flip through: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=lifetime+product+license+revoked+-driver&t=brave&ia=web Possible things to investigate to add: Norton --><!-- I want to add this one, BUT the article has ZERO work done. https://consumerrights.wiki/Tango_Elegoo_Edition_False_Lifetime_License -->== | ==Examples<!-- Web search to flip through: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=lifetime+product+license+revoked+-driver&t=brave&ia=web Possible things to investigate to add: Norton --><!-- I want to add this one, BUT the article has ZERO work done. https://consumerrights.wiki/Tango_Elegoo_Edition_False_Lifetime_License -->== | ||
| Line 82: | Line 87: | ||
|2025 | |2025 | ||
|TBA<ref>{{Cite news |last=Raindog308 |date=Mar 10, 2025 |title=The Mailbird Scam: When a "Lifetime" License is Not Lifetime |url=https://lowendbox.com/blog/the-mailbird-scam-when-a-lifetime-license-is-not-lifetime/ |access-date=May 28, 2025 |work=LowEndBox}}</ref> | |TBA<ref>{{Cite news |last=Raindog308 |date=Mar 10, 2025 |title=The Mailbird Scam: When a "Lifetime" License is Not Lifetime |url=https://lowendbox.com/blog/the-mailbird-scam-when-a-lifetime-license-is-not-lifetime/ |access-date=May 28, 2025 |work=LowEndBox}}</ref> | ||
|[[Mailbird revokes lifetime licenses]] | |[[Mailbird revokes lifetime licenses]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[[Better Way Electronics]] | |[[Better Way Electronics]] | ||
| Line 89: | Line 94: | ||
|TBA | |TBA | ||
|TBA | |TBA | ||
|- | |||
|Magix | |||
|Vegas 15 | |||
|2025 | |||
|Formerly sold under Sony, Magix has pulled Vegas 15 from Steam and has also revoked licenses | |||
|https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkxma1DxdvcvxPtveni0uDBqw403WSI7Dkn?si=SZtUOMc00x_xUV_x | |||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 99: | Line 110: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
[[Category:Theme]] | |||
[[Category: | [[Category:Lifetime license removal]] | ||