Consumer Rights Wiki

Flock License Plate Readers: Difference between revisions

VisualWikitext
Created page with "{{ProductCargo |Company=Flock Safety |ProductLine=Flock Safety Falcon |ReleaseYear=2024 |InProduction=Yes |ArticleType=Product |Category=Cameras, Security |Logo=Flock License plate readers (LPR).png |Website=https://www.flocksafety.com/products/license-plate-readers |Description=Previously called The Falcon, the License Plate Readers records all nearby license plates for local authorities without the driver's consent. }} {{Ph-C-Int}} ==Consumer impact summary== {{Ph-..."
 
→Abortion & immigration tracking (2025): the word “were” was missing.
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Stub}}
{{ProductCargo
{{ProductCargo
|Company=Flock Safety
|Company=Flock Safety
|ProductLine=Flock Safety Falcon
|ProductLine=Flock Safety Falcon
|ReleaseYear=2024
|ReleaseYear=2017
|InProduction=Yes
|InProduction=Yes
|ArticleType=Product
|ArticleType=Product
|Category=Cameras, Security
|Category=Cameras, Security, Surveillance
|Logo=Flock License plate readers (LPR).png
|Logo=Flock License plate readers (LPR).png
|Website=https://www.flocksafety.com/products/license-plate-readers
|Website=https://www.flocksafety.com/products/license-plate-readers
|Description=Previously called The Falcon, the License Plate Readers records all nearby license plates for local authorities without the driver's consent.
|Description=AI-powered automated license plate reader (ALPR) system that creates "Vehicle Fingerprints" by recording license plates, vehicle characteristics, and movement patterns for law enforcement use without individual consent or warrants.
}}
}}
{{Ph-C-Int}}
'''Flock License Plate Readers''' (previously known as '''Flock Safety Falcon'''<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.flocksafety.com/devices/falcon|title=Falcon|work=Flock Safety|access-date=2024-12-06|archive-url=https://archive.ph/UjKM5|archive-date=2024-12-06|url-status=dead}}</ref>), are a network of AI-powered surveillance cameras that continuously record vehicle data for law enforcement agencies. The system operates in over 5,000 communities across 49 U.S. states, performing over 20 billion vehicle scans monthly.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/06/flock-safetys-feature-updates-cannot-make-automated-license-plate-readers-safe|title=Flock Safety's Feature Updates Cannot Make Automated License Plate Readers Safe|work=Electronic Frontier Foundation|date=2025-06-01|access-date=2025-08-23}}</ref>


==Consumer impact summary==
==Taxpayer impact summary==
{{Ph-C-CIS}}
====Freedom====
Residents & taxpayers have no mechanism to opt-out of Flock's surveillance network. The cameras operate 24/7 in public spaces, recording all passing vehicles regardless of consent. Unlike traditional security cameras that may be avoided by choosing different routes, Flock's expanding network of over 40,000 cameras makes avoidance increasingly difficult.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://deflock.me/|title=Find Nearby ALPRs|work=DeFlock|access-date=2025-08-23|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250728224453/https://deflock.me/|archive-date=2025-07-28|url-status=live}}</ref> The system uses AI to create ''"Vehicle Fingerprints"'' that identify vehicles by characteristics beyond license plates, including make, model, color, window stickers, & roof racks.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.aclu.org/news/national-security/surveillance-company-flock-now-using-ai-to-report-us-to-police-if-it-thinks-our-movement-patterns-are-suspicious|title=Surveillance Company Flock Now Using AI to Report Us to Police if it Thinks Our Movement Patterns Are "Suspicious"|work=American Civil Liberties Union|date=2024|access-date=2025-08-23}}</ref>
 
====Privacy====
While Flock Safety claims their system doesn't violate Fourth Amendment rights because ''"license plates are not personal information,"''<ref name="Flock-PE">{{Cite web|url=https://www.flocksafety.com/privacy-ethics|title=Privacy & Ethics|work=Flock Safety|access-date=2025-08-23|archive-url=https://archive.ph/OP55p|archive-date=2025-08-23|url-status=live}}</ref> federal courts have challenged this interpretation. In February 2024, a federal judge ruled that Norfolk, Virginia's use of 172 Flock cameras likely violates the Fourth Amendment, finding the system creates a ''"detailed chronicle of a person's physical presence compiled every day."''<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://ij.org/press-release/judge-rules-lawsuit-challenging-norfolks-use-of-flock-cameras-can-proceed/|title=Judge Rules Lawsuit Challenging Norfolk's Use of Flock Cameras Can Proceed|work=Institute for Justice|date=2024-02-01|access-date=2025-08-23}}</ref>
 
Data collected includes location history that can reveal sensitive information about medical visits, religious attendance, political activities, & personal associations. While Flock states data is deleted after 30 days, contracts grant them ''"perpetual, worldwide, royalty-free license"'' to use anonymized data indefinitely.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.flocksafety.com/terms-and-conditions|title=Terms and Conditions|work=Flock Safety|access-date=2025-08-23}}</ref> The system shares data across a network of over 4,800 law enforcement agencies nationally.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.404media.co/lawsuit-argues-warrantless-use-of-flock-surveillance-cameras-is-unconstitutional/|title=Lawsuit Argues Warrantless Use of Flock Surveillance Cameras Is Unconstitutional|work=404 Media|date=2024|access-date=2025-08-23}}</ref> 
 
====="Anonymized data"=====
While Flock defines "Anonymized Data" as customer data ''"permanently stripped of identifying details and any potential personally identifiable information"'' , rendered so a person or entity ''"can no longer be identified directly or indirectly"'', this category still includes info like the vehicle make, model, color, location patterns, & other non–license-plate attributes.<ref>{{cite web |date=2025-07-22 |title=Terms and Conditions |url=https://www.flocksafety.com/legal/terms-and-conditions |access-date=2025-08-23 |website=Flock Safety}}</ref>
 
Privacy researchers caution that mobility datasets labeled as "anonymized" can still be re-identified. A 2013 MIT study found that just four spatio-temporal points uniquely identified 95% of individuals in an anonymized location dataset.<ref>{{cite journal |last=de Montjoye |first=Y.-A. |last2=Hidalgo |first2=C. A. |last3=Verleysen |first3=M. |last4=Blondel |first4=V. D. |year=2013 |title=Unique in the Crowd: The privacy bounds of human mobility |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/srep01376 |journal=Scientific Reports |volume=3 |pages=1376 |doi=10.1038/srep01376 |access-date=2025-08-23}}</ref> Civil liberties organizations such as the EFF & ACLU note that when detailed travel histories are retained, even without license plates, they're often able to be linked back to individuals when combined with other data sources.<ref>{{cite web |date=2025-06-01 |title=Flock Safety's Feature Updates Cannot Make Automated License Plate Readers Safe |url=https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/06/flock-safetys-feature-updates-cannot-make-automated-license-plate-readers-safe |access-date=2025-08-23 |website=Electronic Frontier Foundation}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=2024 |title=Surveillance Company Flock Now Using AI to Report Us to Police if it Thinks Our Movement Patterns Are "Suspicious" |url=https://www.aclu.org/news/national-security/surveillance-company-flock-now-using-ai-to-report-us-to-police-if-it-thinks-our-movement-patterns-are-suspicious |access-date=2025-08-23 |website=American Civil Liberties Union}}</ref>
 
====Business model====
Flock operates on a subscription model charging municipalities and law enforcement agencies $2,500 per camera annually plus installation costs.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://campbellca.gov/FAQ.aspx?QID=279|title=How much does a Flock Safety camera cost?|work=City of Campbell|access-date=2025-08-23}}</ref> Private businesses including Home Depot & Lowe's also deploy cameras, sharing data with law enforcement.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.404media.co/home-depot-and-lowes-share-data-from-hundreds-of-ai-cameras-with-cops/|title=Home Depot and Lowe's Share Data From Hundreds of AI Cameras With Cops|first=Jason|last=Koebler|date=2025-08-06|work=404Media|access-date=2025-08-23|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250823135847/https://www.404media.co/home-depot-and-lowes-share-data-from-hundreds-of-ai-cameras-with-cops/|archive-date=2025-08-23|url-status=live}}</ref> Contracts include automatic renewal clauses & limit municipal oversight capabilities, with cities unable to audit system operations or control how other agencies use shared data.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.aclu.org/wp-content/uploads/publications/flock_1.pdf|title=How to Pump the Brakes on Your Police Department's Use of Flock's Mass Surveillance License Plate Readers|work=ACLU|date=2024|access-date=2025-08-23}}</ref>
 
====Market control====
Flock Safety has rapidly expanded to become a dominant force in automated license plate recognition, operating in 49 states with over 40,000 cameras deployed. The company's network effect creates pressure for additional jurisdictions to join, as law enforcement effectiveness depends on network coverage. Several states have begun restricting access following privacy violations, with California, Illinois, and New York limiting data sharing after immigration and abortion-related tracking incidents.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.michaelrcronin.com/post/flock-blocks-ice-from-license-plate-reader-access-in-several-states|title='Flock' Blocks ICE from License Plate Reader Access in Several States|work=Yes You Can Go|date=2025|access-date=2025-08-23}}</ref>


==Incidents==
==Incidents==
{{Ph-C-Inc}}
===Law enforcement stalking incidents (2022-2025)===
This is a list of all consumer protection incidents related to this product. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the [[:Category:{{PAGENAME}}|{{PAGENAME}} category]].
Many documented cases demonstrate abuse of Flock's surveillance capabilities by law enforcement officers:
 
======Cops stalking their ex:======
In October 2022, Kechi, Kansas Police Lieutenant Victor Heiar was arrested & later pleaded guilty to computer crimes & stalking after using Flock cameras 228 times over four months to track his estranged wife's movements.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.kwch.com/2022/10/31/kechi-police-lieutenant-arrested-using-police-technology-stalk-wife/|title=Kechi police lieutenant arrested for using police technology to stalk wife|work=KWCH|date=2022-10-31|access-date=2025-08-23}}</ref>
 
In a separate Kansas incident, Sedgwick Police Chief Lee Nygaard accessed Flock data 164 times to track his ex-girlfriend before resigning after admitting to the misuse.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.yahoo.com/news/kansas-police-chief-used-flock-093300946.html|title=Kansas police chief used Flock license plate cameras 164 times to track ex-girlfriend|work=Yahoo News|date=2025|access-date=2025-08-23}}</ref>
 
===Abortion & immigration tracking (2025)===
In May 2025, Johnson County, Texas sheriff's deputies used Flock's network to track a woman suspected of self-managing an abortion. They were conducting searches across multiple states including those where abortion is legal. The incident led Illinois officials to investigate and subsequently block 47+ out-of-state agencies from accessing Illinois ALPR data.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.dallasnews.com/news/national/2025/06/12/illinois-officials-investigate-data-shared-with-texas-sheriff-seeking-woman-who-had-abortion/|title=Illinois officials investigate data shared with Texas sheriff seeking woman who had abortion|work=The Dallas Morning News|date=2025-06-12|access-date=2025-08-23}}</ref>
 
404 Media revealed over 4,000 searches by local and state police for federal immigration enforcement purposes, despite Flock having no formal ICE contract.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.404media.co/ice-taps-into-nationwide-ai-enabled-camera-network-data-shows/|title=ICE Taps into Nationwide AI-Enabled Camera Network, Data Shows|work=404 Media|date=2025|access-date=2025-08-23}}</ref> A DEA agent was found using an Illinois police officer's credentials to conduct unauthorized immigration searches.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://unraveledpress.com/a-dea-agent-used-an-illinois-police-officers-flock-license-plate-reader-password-for-unauthorized-immigration-enforcement-searches/|title=DEA agent used Illinois cop's Flock license plate reader password for immigration enforcement searches|work=Unraveled Press|date=2025|access-date=2025-08-23}}</ref>
 
===City rejections and terminations (2025)===
Multiple cities have rejected or terminated Flock contracts following privacy concerns and effectiveness issues:
 
======0.2% effectiveness rate, low arrests:======
Austin, Texas terminated its contract in July 2025 after an audit revealed "systematic compliance failures" and only 165 arrests from 113 million license plate scans (0.2% effectiveness rate).<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://cbsaustin.com/news/local/flock-ceo-responds-to-austin-backlash-as-city-contract-nears-expiration|title=Flock CEO responds to Austin backlash as city contract nears expiration|work=CBS Austin|date=2025|access-date=2025-08-23}}</ref>
 
Denver City Council unanimously rejected a $666,000 contract extension in May 2025 following revelations of 1,400+ ICE-related searches in Colorado data.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://denverite.com/2025/05/05/denver-rejects-flock-camera-license-plate-readers/|title=Denver rejects $666,000 extension for license-plate surveillance cameras after backlash|work=Denverite|date=2025-05-05|access-date=2025-08-23}}</ref>
 
San Marcos, Texas voted 5-2 to deny camera expansion after discovering no required audits had been conducted since 2022.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://cbsaustin.com/news/local/san-marcos-city-council-votes-to-deny-flock-camera-expansion-after-hours-of-heated-debate|title=San Marcos City Council votes to deny flock camera expansion after hours of heated debate|work=CBS Austin|date=2025|access-date=2025-08-23}}</ref>
 
Oak Park, Illinois terminated their contract entirely following the Illinois investigation into illegal data sharing.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.oakpark.com/2025/08/07/oak-park-terminates-flock-license-plate-reader-contract/|title=Oak Park terminates Flock license plate reader contract|work=Wednesday Journal|date=2025-08-07|access-date=2025-08-23}}</ref>


===Example incident one (''date'')===
===Constitutional challenges (2024-ongoing)===
{{Main|link to the main article}}
In February 2024, Federal Judge Mark Davis ruled that Norfolk, Virginia's use of 172 Flock cameras likely violates the Fourth Amendment, comparing the case to Carpenter v. United States regarding warrantless location tracking. The judge found it "''difficult to drive anywhere of any distance without running into a camera."''<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://insideinvestigator.org/flock-camera-lawsuit-can-move-forward/|title=Flock camera lawsuit can move forward|work=Connecticut Inside Investigator|date=2024|access-date=2025-08-23}}</ref>
Short summary of the incident (could be the same as the summary preceding the article).
===Example incident two (''date'')===
...


===False positive incidents (2025)===


==See also==
======Held at gunpoint:======
{{Ph-C-SA}}
In Española, New Mexico, 21-year-old Jaclynn Gonzales and her 12-year-old sister were held at gunpoint & handcuffed after Flock's system mistook a "2" for a "7" on their license plate, falsely flagging their vehicle as stolen.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://redact.dev/blog/flock-safety-lpr-privacy-surveillance/|title=Flock Safety: Eroding Your Privacy & Keeping You Safe with Surveillance|work=Redact|date=2025|access-date=2025-08-23}}</ref>


===Security vulnerabilities (2024)===
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency identified 7 critical vulnerabilities in Motorola ALPR systems similar to Flock's, including hardcoded passwords & unencrypted data storage.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/06/new-alpr-vulnerabilities-prove-mass-surveillance-public-safety-threat|title=New ALPR Vulnerabilities Prove Mass Surveillance Is a Public Safety Threat|work=Electronic Frontier Foundation|date=2024-06-18|access-date=2025-08-23}}</ref>


==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}
==External links==
*[https://deflock.me/ DeFlock live map of active ALPRs]
*[https://www.noalprs.org/ No ALPRS movement in United States]


[[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]]
[[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]]
Retrieved from "https://consumerrights.wiki/Flock_License_Plate_Readers"