Flock License Plate Readers: Difference between revisions
Elusivesnake (talk | contribs) Added link to Eyes on Flock - community made aggregator of all the public facing transparency portals. |
Elusivesnake (talk | contribs) →Constitutional challenges (2024-ongoing): Added link to the IJ lawsuit for quick reference to all court documents. |
||
| Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
===Constitutional challenges (2024-ongoing)=== | ===Constitutional challenges (2024-ongoing)=== | ||
In February 2024, Federal Judge Mark Davis denied Norfolk's motion to dismiss a Fourth Amendment challenge filed by the Institute for Justice ( IJ.org ) to the city's use of 172 Flock cameras, comparing the case to Carpenter v. United States regarding warrantless location tracking. Norfolk Police Chief Mark Talbot stated that the cameras were placed so it would be "''difficult to drive anywhere of any distance without running into a camera."''<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://insideinvestigator.org/flock-camera-lawsuit-can-move-forward/|title=Flock camera lawsuit can move forward|work=Connecticut Inside Investigator|date=2024|access-date=2025-08-23}}</ref> | In February 2024, Federal Judge Mark Davis denied Norfolk's motion to dismiss a Fourth Amendment challenge filed by the Institute for Justice ( IJ.org ) to the city's use of 172 Flock cameras, comparing the case to Carpenter v. United States regarding warrantless location tracking. Norfolk Police Chief Mark Talbot stated that the cameras were placed so it would be "''difficult to drive anywhere of any distance without running into a camera."''<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://insideinvestigator.org/flock-camera-lawsuit-can-move-forward/|title=Flock camera lawsuit can move forward|work=Connecticut Inside Investigator|date=2024|access-date=2025-08-23}}</ref> View the ongoing case details [https://ij.org/case/norfolk-virginia-camera-surveillance/ here.] | ||
===Security vulnerabilities (2024)=== | ===Security vulnerabilities (2024)=== | ||