Talk:Samsung: Difference between revisions
Samsung has sold devices capable of bootloader unlocking, but later restricted it by neglecting their service. Something along that line. |
quick tidying up |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Samsung left the certificate for their one service expired, making older phone incapable of unlocking their boot loader after factory reset. == | == Samsung left the certificate for their one service expired, making older phone incapable of unlocking their boot loader after factory reset. == | ||
This is basically a nearly incoherent word vomit that I just wanted to get it out there asap before I forgot about it. | This is basically a nearly incoherent word vomit that I just wanted to get it out there asap before I forgot about it. Is related to the ''"Samsung has sold devices capable of bootloader unlocking, but further restricted it with an update."'' point | ||
According to this: https://xdaforums.com/t/seems-like-the-server-samsung-use-to-unlock-rmm-prenormal-is-abandoned-expired-certificate-whats-next-lol.4403393/ | According to this: https://xdaforums.com/t/seems-like-the-server-samsung-use-to-unlock-rmm-prenormal-is-abandoned-expired-certificate-whats-next-lol.4403393/ | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
https://4pda.to/forum/index.php?showtopic=881591&st=3160 (in Russian) | https://4pda.to/forum/index.php?showtopic=881591&st=3160 (in Russian) | ||
https://eu.community.samsung.com/t5/galaxy-a-series/samsung-a5-2017-no-oem-unlock/td-p/5255654 | https://eu.community.samsung.com/t5/galaxy-a-series/samsung-a5-2017-no-oem-unlock/td-p/5255654 | ||
[[Special:Contributions/45.87.213.229|45.87.213.229]] 13:19, 27 August 2025 (UTC) | [[Special:Contributions/45.87.213.229|45.87.213.229]] 13:19, 27 August 2025 (UTC) | ||