Consent-or-pay: Difference between revisions

KlartextSpeaker (talk | contribs)
How it works: Formatting and reordering
KlartextSpeaker (talk | contribs)
News organizations: Format + more examples for newsorganizations
Line 13: Line 13:
When a user visits a website, a pop-up consent window is displayed. Traditional options would be '''Accept''' or '''Reject''' cookies. However the user is presented with the options to '''Accept or Pay'''.
When a user visits a website, a pop-up consent window is displayed. Traditional options would be '''Accept''' or '''Reject''' cookies. However the user is presented with the options to '''Accept or Pay'''.


* The payment is typically a low fee (around £1.99 per month).
*The payment is typically a low fee (around £1.99 per month).
* Many of the sites that use the model were previously free-to-access and funded primarily through advertising.
*Many of the sites that use the model were previously free-to-access and funded primarily through advertising.
* Consumers must now “pay” either with their personal data or with money.
*Consumers must now “pay” either with their personal data or with money.


This effectively introduces a '''paywall for previously freely accessible content''', even if no traditional subscription model exists.
This effectively introduces a '''paywall for previously freely accessible content''', even if no traditional subscription model exists.
Line 30: Line 30:


===News organizations===
===News organizations===
News organization websites appear to be the most common practitioner of the consent-or-pay model, effectively paywalling their free content by collecting data or money. These organizations include:
Many media outlets adopted Consent-or-pay. Some High-profile european examples include:


*The Mirror
* The Mirror
*The Independent
* The Independent
* Der Spiegel
* Der Standard
* Le Monde
* Le Parisien
* Corriere della Sera


==Response==
==Response==