User:Drakeula: Difference between revisions

Line 24:

===LLM===

'''Deceptive marketing.''' Generative AI makes a really impressive demo. Marketed as improving productivity, substitute or augmentation for artists, writers, researchers, or programmers. Typically produces low quality results, makes the job harder and less rewarding. It is no substitute for knowing what you are doing. [AI e-mails are longer, AI writing is cliche dull, AI "summaries" ]

'''Deceptive marketing.''' Generative AI makes a really impressive demo. Marketed as improving productivity, substitute or augmentation for artists, writers, researchers, or programmers. Typically produces low quality results, makes the job harder, and less rewarding. It is no substitute for knowing what you are doing. [AI e-mails are longer, AI writing is cliche dull, AI "summaries" ][https://pivot-to-ai.com/2025/04/29/generative-ai-no-significant-impact-on-earnings-or-recorded-hours-in-any-occupation/<nowiki> No significant impact on earnings or recorded hours in any occupation][[2/3 accept AI output, right or wrong; 1/3 said fixing AI mistakes take as much time as not use AI]</nowiki>https://pivot-to-ai.com/2025/07/25/16-of-employees-pretend-to-use-ai-at-work-to-please-their-boss/<nowiki>][ [Upwork survey. 3/4 AI tools decreased productivity, also burnout]</nowiki>https://pivot-to-ai.com/2024/07/27/upwork-survey-ai-hurts-productivity-and-makes-your-employees-leave/<nowiki>][ [McKinsey, over 80% surveyed companies no material contrib earnings from gen AI </nowiki>https://pivot-to-ai.com/2025/08/18/ai-brings-huge-enterprise-efficiencies-except-in-making-money/<nowiki>]</nowiki>

*AI coding promoted as reducing costs of software development, in testing programmers feel like they are more productive, but actually take longer.[cite] Code produced is of questionable quality, and may take more maintenance. [At its best, it substitutes using a

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 ===LLM===
-'''Deceptive marketing.'''  Generative AI makes a really impressive demo.  Marketed as improving productivity, substitute or augmentation for artists, writers, researchers, or programmers.  Typically produces low quality results, makes the job harder and less rewarding.  It is no substitute for knowing what you are doing.  [AI e-mails are longer, AI writing is cliche dull, AI "summaries" ]
+'''Deceptive marketing.'''  Generative AI makes a really impressive demo.  Marketed as improving productivity, substitute or augmentation for artists, writers, researchers, or programmers.  Typically produces low quality results, makes the job harder, and less rewarding.  It is no substitute for knowing what you are doing.  [AI e-mails are longer, AI writing is cliche dull, AI "summaries" ][https://pivot-to-ai.com/2025/04/29/generative-ai-no-significant-impact-on-earnings-or-recorded-hours-in-any-occupation/<nowiki>  No significant impact on earnings or recorded hours in any occupation][[2/3 accept AI output, right or wrong; 1/3 said fixing AI mistakes take as much time as not use AI]</nowiki>https://pivot-to-ai.com/2025/07/25/16-of-employees-pretend-to-use-ai-at-work-to-please-their-boss/<nowiki>][ [Upwork survey.  3/4 AI tools decreased productivity, also burnout]</nowiki>https://pivot-to-ai.com/2024/07/27/upwork-survey-ai-hurts-productivity-and-makes-your-employees-leave/<nowiki>][ [McKinsey, over 80% surveyed companies no material contrib earnings from gen AI  </nowiki>https://pivot-to-ai.com/2025/08/18/ai-brings-huge-enterprise-efficiencies-except-in-making-money/<nowiki>]</nowiki>
 *AI coding promoted as reducing costs of software development, in testing programmers feel like they are more productive, but actually take longer.[cite]  Code produced is of questionable quality, and may take more maintenance.  [At its best, it substitutes using a