Talk:Shell: Difference between revisions
Add topicLatest comment: 23 March by Keith in topic Relating to Human Rights issue
→Relating to Human Rights issue: new section |
fixed hanging sentence |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Relating to Human Rights issue | ==Relating to Human Rights issue== | ||
I checked in the logs that you deleted the Nigerian incident, and while I get that it is more leaning towards a Human rights issue and doesn't closely fit into the aspect of consumer rights wiki, I don't agree that it should be out-right removed as (in my opinion) still resemble some aspects of consumers being impacted (like false advertising campaign towards climate change, however the company/gov merely responded with killings, tortures, removal/burning of homes). I feel it should still be mentioned maybe as a side note or hinted at, or even maybe in the future we can re-add later on down the line? @[[User:Mr Pollo|Mr Pollo]] [[User:SquidthePlummer|SquidthePlummer]] ([[User talk:SquidthePlummer|talk]]) 22:09, 18 March 2026 (UTC) | I checked in the logs that you deleted the Nigerian incident, and while I get that it is more leaning towards a Human rights issue and doesn't closely fit into the aspect of consumer rights wiki, I don't agree that it should be out-right removed as (in my opinion) still resemble some aspects of consumers being impacted (like false advertising campaign towards climate change, however the company/gov merely responded with killings, tortures, removal/burning of homes). I feel it should still be mentioned maybe as a side note or hinted at, or even maybe in the future we can re-add later on down the line? @[[User:Mr Pollo|Mr Pollo]] [[User:SquidthePlummer|SquidthePlummer]] ([[User talk:SquidthePlummer|talk]]) 22:09, 18 March 2026 (UTC) | ||
:Hello! I have brought this up with the other staff members for consideration. They or I will reply when a consensus is made. [[User:Mr Pollo|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo|talk]]) 02:43, 22 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
::sounds good! [[User:SquidthePlummer|SquidthePlummer]] ([[User talk:SquidthePlummer|talk]]) 19:27, 23 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
:::A an off-hand reference (with citation) could potentially be made when discussing them being misleading about their social impact in consumer-facing marketing, however I don't think it's worth getting into much beyond some statement like 'presents themselves in x way[citation] whilst maintaining close ties to governments involved in y crimes[citation]. Maybe the 'governments involved in y crimes' woulc have a wikipedia link to the relevant page. | |||
:::Ultimately any kind of detailed explanation etc. of events is I think beyond the wiki's scope [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 23:23, 23 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:24, 23 March 2026
Relating to Human Rights issue
[edit source]I checked in the logs that you deleted the Nigerian incident, and while I get that it is more leaning towards a Human rights issue and doesn't closely fit into the aspect of consumer rights wiki, I don't agree that it should be out-right removed as (in my opinion) still resemble some aspects of consumers being impacted (like false advertising campaign towards climate change, however the company/gov merely responded with killings, tortures, removal/burning of homes). I feel it should still be mentioned maybe as a side note or hinted at, or even maybe in the future we can re-add later on down the line? @Mr Pollo SquidthePlummer (talk) 22:09, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
- Hello! I have brought this up with the other staff members for consideration. They or I will reply when a consensus is made. Mr Pollo (talk) 02:43, 22 March 2026 (UTC)
- sounds good! SquidthePlummer (talk) 19:27, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
- A an off-hand reference (with citation) could potentially be made when discussing them being misleading about their social impact in consumer-facing marketing, however I don't think it's worth getting into much beyond some statement like 'presents themselves in x way[citation] whilst maintaining close ties to governments involved in y crimes[citation]. Maybe the 'governments involved in y crimes' woulc have a wikipedia link to the relevant page.
- Ultimately any kind of detailed explanation etc. of events is I think beyond the wiki's scope Keith (talk) 23:23, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
- sounds good! SquidthePlummer (talk) 19:27, 23 March 2026 (UTC)