Talk:Enshittification: Difference between revisions
→non-monopolistic decay: new section |
→non-monopolistic decay: Reply |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
::Thanks. Agree. [[User:CrookKilla|CrookKilla]] ([[User talk:CrookKilla|talk]]) 03:33, 4 March 2026 (UTC) | ::Thanks. Agree. [[User:CrookKilla|CrookKilla]] ([[User talk:CrookKilla|talk]]) 03:33, 4 March 2026 (UTC) | ||
== non-monopolistic decay == | ==non-monopolistic decay== | ||
I think I've found an instance of panic-driven enshittification (rather than monopoly/power-driven): https://danluu.com/cpu-bugs/ . TLDR: Intel cut costs on testing, so CPUs are more unreliable, but they can ship/deploy faster [[User:Rudxain|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain|talk]]) 05:19, 29 March 2026 (UTC) | I think I've found an instance of panic-driven enshittification (rather than monopoly/power-driven): https://danluu.com/cpu-bugs/ . TLDR: Intel cut costs on testing, so CPUs are more unreliable, but they can ship/deploy faster [[User:Rudxain|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain|talk]]) 05:19, 29 March 2026 (UTC) | ||
:Not sure if that'd be a consumer rights issue, but could still be mentioned to show that not all enshittification is intentionally anti-consumer rights [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 07:33, 29 March 2026 (UTC) | |||