Consumer Rights Wiki:Moderator guidelines: Difference between revisions
updated wording around article deletion |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Moderator rules for evaluating and processing submissions== | ==Moderator rules for evaluating and processing submissions== | ||
These rules aim to provide clear guidance for moderators to determine whether a submission should be included in the wiki and outline what changes or additional information would be required for inclusion. | These rules aim to provide clear guidance for moderators to determine whether a submission should be included in the wiki and outline what changes or additional information would be required for inclusion. | ||
| Line 29: | Line 28: | ||
*'''If the article is a person page:''' | *'''If the article is a person page:''' | ||
#The article is compliant with the [[Living | #The article is compliant with the [[Consumer Rights Wiki:Living persons policy|Living Persons Policy]]. If article is non-compliant, then delete content, or the entire article, as appropriate. | ||
#The subject of the article is a person with major decision-making influence over one or more incident pages, at least one of which must be of high quality (properly sourced, so on and so forth) | #The subject of the article is a person with major decision-making influence over one or more incident pages, at least one of which must be of high quality (properly sourced, so on and so forth) | ||
| Line 56: | Line 55: | ||
These are guidelines for the implementation of the Wiki's content policies and editorial guidelines. | These are guidelines for the implementation of the Wiki's content policies and editorial guidelines. | ||
Please note that, as per the Wiki's [[Living Persons Policy]], a stricter approach should be taken to the moderation of articles about, or which mention, Living People. | Please note that, as per the Wiki's [[Consumer Rights Wiki:Living persons policy|Living Persons Policy]], a stricter approach should be taken to the moderation of articles about, or which mention, Living People. | ||
====A. Available tags:==== | ====A. Available tags:==== | ||
| Line 82: | Line 81: | ||
*[[Template:DeletionRequest|DeletionRequest]]<br />Use for an article which is clearly irrelevant, spam, or not likely to be improved. | *[[Template:DeletionRequest|DeletionRequest]]<br />Use for an article which is clearly irrelevant, spam, or not likely to be improved. | ||
*[[Template:SloppyAI|SloppyAI]]<br />Use for an article where AI is heavily used without enough care and/or supervision to guarantee the credibility or readability or the article. | *[[Template:SloppyAI|SloppyAI]]<br />Use for an article where AI is heavily used without enough care and/or supervision to guarantee the credibility or readability or the article. | ||
*[[Template:Cleanup|Cleanup]]<br />Use for when an article has good content, but lacks a clear structure | |||
Optionally when using the <code>Incomplete</code> tag, up to four specific issues with the article can be pointed out by including <code><nowiki>Issue 1/2/3/4</nowiki></code> parameters these appear in a numbered list in the notice (see [[Template:Incomplete|Incomplete]] for example usage). | Optionally when using the <code>Incomplete</code> tag, up to four specific issues with the article can be pointed out by including <code><nowiki>Issue 1/2/3/4</nowiki></code> parameters these appear in a numbered list in the notice (see [[Template:Incomplete|Incomplete]] for example usage). | ||
| Line 129: | Line 129: | ||
A good article, not in need of marking, should '''substantiate its claims.''' | A good article, not in need of marking, should '''substantiate its claims.''' | ||
*Utilise sources in line with [[Wiki | *Utilise sources in line with [[Consumer Rights Wiki:Wiki content policies#Verifiability|the Wiki's verifiability policy]]. | ||
*Corroborate patterns or systemic relevance through multiple examples or reports | *Corroborate patterns or systemic relevance through multiple examples or reports | ||
| Line 141: | Line 141: | ||
====E. Tone and presentation:==== | ====E. Tone and presentation:==== | ||
A good (non-Theme) article, not in need of marking, will be written in accordance with the Wiki's implementation of [[Wiki | A good (non-Theme) article, not in need of marking, will be written in accordance with the Wiki's implementation of [[Consumer Rights Wiki:Wiki content policies|NPOV (Neutral Point-Of-View):]] | ||
*'''The article should be neutral and factual,''' without unnecessarily emotional language, and without coming across as an expression of personal grievances or irrelevant hypotheticals. | *'''The article should be neutral and factual,''' without unnecessarily emotional language, and without coming across as an expression of personal grievances or irrelevant hypotheticals. | ||
| Line 316: | Line 316: | ||
#*Demonstrate connection to systemic issues rather than isolated incident. | #*Demonstrate connection to systemic issues rather than isolated incident. | ||
#*Include verifiable evidence of Apple's involvement. | #*Include verifiable evidence of Apple's involvement. | ||
{{#seo: | |||
|title=Moderator Guidelines - Consumer Rights Wiki | |||
|description=Guidelines for Consumer Rights Wiki moderators covering content inclusion criteria, article evaluation standards, dispute resolution, and community management policies. | |||
|og:title=Moderator Guidelines - Consumer Rights Wiki | |||
|og:description=Guidelines for Consumer Rights Wiki moderators covering content inclusion criteria, article evaluation standards, dispute resolution, and community management policies. | |||
|og:type=article | |||
|keywords=consumer rights wiki, moderator guidelines, content policies, article evaluation, dispute resolution, moderation | |||
}} | |||
[[Category:CRW]] | [[Category:CRW]] | ||