Talk:Valve removes arbitration requirement from Steam Subscriber Agreement: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 23:56, 1 May 2026

From Someoneontheinternet

I wonder if the positive incident should be deleted since it's talking about a positive thing that Steam has done, as opposed to a negative action. Or maybe it's just a coincidence that almost everything on this website is negative. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Someoneontheinternet (talk • contribs) 20:54, 19 January 2025

Naw, positives should be documented just as much as negatives. Wiki's should be free from bias, and while this one obviously has bias, there's good reason, and positives reports help to offset that. It wouldn't do well for this page to show entirely negative reports, as then it would be easier for people to dismiss this wiki entirely, if it didn't document the positives as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mandle Rex (talk • contribs) 02:10, 1 May 2026

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == From Someoneontheinternet ==
-I wonder if the positive incident should be deleted since it's talking about a positive thing that Steam has done, as opposed to a negative action. Or maybe it's just a coincidence that almost everything on this website is negative.
+I wonder if the positive incident should be deleted since it's talking about a positive thing that Steam has done, as opposed to a negative action. Or maybe it's just a coincidence that almost everything on this website is negative. {{Unsigned|Someoneontheinternet|20:54, 19 January 2025}}
+:Naw, positives should be documented just as much as negatives. Wiki's should be free from bias, and while this one obviously has bias, there's good reason, and positives reports help to offset that. It wouldn't do well for this page to show entirely negative reports, as then it would be easier for people to dismiss this wiki entirely, if it didn't document the positives as well. {{Unsigned|Mandle Rex|02:10, 1 May 2026}}