Talk:New York 3D printer blocking technology mandate: Difference between revisions
note pointing to background analysis essay in userspace |
→info on false positives: new section |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Background analysis essay == | ==Background analysis essay== | ||
Background analysis on the technical, factual, and legal basis of 3D-printer blocking mandates: [[User:Louis/3D-printed firearms and the technical basis for printer mandates]]. [[User:Louis|Louis]] ([[User talk:Louis|talk]]) 03:59, 2 June 2026 (UTC) | Background analysis on the technical, factual, and legal basis of 3D-printer blocking mandates: [[User:Louis/3D-printed firearms and the technical basis for printer mandates]]. [[User:Louis|Louis]] ([[User talk:Louis|talk]]) 03:59, 2 June 2026 (UTC) | ||
:Maybe important to highlight: P.A. Luty's book exists, so I'd say the ship kind of sailed if they want to control the concept of homemade automated firearms. Any idiot with access to basic hand tools and some metal stock can make an automatic firearm that's semi-reliable that will quite easily outperform almost anything 3D printed. [[User:NonPassivatedMOSFET|NonPassivatedMOSFET]] ([[User talk:NonPassivatedMOSFET|talk]]) 07:41, 2 June 2026 (UTC) | |||
== info on false positives == | |||
[[User:Louis/3D printer firearm-blocking mandates and geometric false positives]] [[User:Louis|Louis]] ([[User talk:Louis|talk]]) 17:32, 2 June 2026 (UTC) | |||