Talk:Mastodon: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
SinexTitan (talk | contribs) →Notice of relevancy: Reply |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Notice of relevancy | ==Notice of relevancy== | ||
Hello, apolgoies for not making this prior. The reason why I added the delete template to this article was because of a policy change the staff team decided on earlier this month. Here’s what was added to the pro-consumer articles category after the meeting: | Hello, apolgoies for not making this prior. The reason why I added the delete template to this article was because of a policy change the staff team decided on earlier this month. Here’s what was added to the pro-consumer articles category after the meeting: | ||
" These are articles that display growth for consumer rights, whether it is an incident, theme, or law. Note: companies, people, and products should not have a pro-consumer article made about them." | " These are articles that display growth for consumer rights, whether it is an incident, theme, or law. Note: companies, people, and products should not have a pro-consumer article made about them." | ||
The reason for not including companies is to not sound like we are endorsing them, since article content can include biases. [[User:Mr Pollo|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo|talk]]) 11:44, 27 June 2026 (UTC) | The reason for not including companies is to not sound like we are endorsing them, since article content can include biases. [[User:Mr Pollo|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo|talk]]) 11:44, 27 June 2026 (UTC) | ||
:cool cool. I did not create the article for Mastodon being prosumer. I am actively looking into mastodon.social bans providing no rule violation and rejecting appeals. [[User:SinexTitan|SinexTitan]] ([[User talk:SinexTitan|talk]]) 15:03, 27 June 2026 (UTC) | |||