Talk:Kroger merger deal with Albertson: Difference between revisions
CrookKilla (talk | contribs) →Company response section irrelevant ?: new section |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Company response section irrelevant ? == | ==Company response section irrelevant ?== | ||
The Company response section is about an [https://boisedev.com/news/2026/06/12/albertsons-kroger-millerchip/ interesting topic] but doesn't seem to be on-topic for CRW. Let's delete it and the <nowiki>{{OngoingEvent}}</nowiki> tag? [[User:CrookKilla|CrookKilla]] ([[User talk:CrookKilla|talk]]) 16:25, 3 July 2026 (UTC) | The Company response section is about an [https://boisedev.com/news/2026/06/12/albertsons-kroger-millerchip/ interesting topic] but doesn't seem to be on-topic for CRW. Let's delete it and the <nowiki>{{OngoingEvent}}</nowiki> tag? [[User:CrookKilla|CrookKilla]] ([[User talk:CrookKilla|talk]]) 16:25, 3 July 2026 (UTC) | ||
:I removed the tag and, while at it, cleaned up the references and included some additional information. I would argue the company responses are relevant (albeit perhaps a weaker connection) because lawsuits cost money and it has to come from somewhere/someone. It also helps provide a more holistic picture of the topic and not leave the average person going "huh, wonder about...?" | |||
:The company responses section didn't require much cleaning itself, and overall I found it informative while avoiding coming across as verbose. — [[User:Sojourna|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna|talk]]) 02:07, 4 July 2026 (UTC) | |||