Brother printers causing issues with third party inks: Difference between revisions

Beanie Bo (talk | contribs)
m Grammar fix
Beanie Bo (talk | contribs)
Cleaned up intro paragraph
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ToneWarning}}
[[Brother Industries Ltd.|Brother]] is a printer company that has allowed the use of third-party toner cartridges with their printer devices. Recent firmware updates have changed this practice by displaying an error message when consumers attempt to install their third-party toner that was previously allowed. When using the Brother printer with the toner of their choice, some users report a significant decrease in print quality, functionally disabling the printer unless OEM toner is installed.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Jacobs |first=Skye |date=2025-03-05 |title=Brother printers are quietly sabotaging third-party toner with firmware updates |url=https://www.techspot.com/news/107022-brother-printers-quietly-sabotaging-third-party-toner-firmware.html}}</ref>
In the past, [[Brother Industries Ltd.|Brother]] has allowed the use of third-party toner in their printers which showcases a consumer-friendly approach to the printing industry. In recent years, however, firmware updates have been implemented to discourage toner usage from manufacturers other than Brother. When a user attempts to install a third-party toner, an act that was previously accepted, the Brother printer displays an error message warning that the toner may damage the printer and only OEM (original equipment manufacturer) toner is safe to use. Continuing their practice of installing third-party toners, some users report a notable decrease in print quality. This is due to the firmware updates having disabled color registration among other core printing features from third-party toner cartridges, effectively locking in users to purchase toners manufactured only by Brother.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Jacobs |first=Skye |date=2025-03-05 |title=Brother printers are quietly sabotaging third-party toner with firmware updates |url=https://www.techspot.com/news/107022-brother-printers-quietly-sabotaging-third-party-toner-firmware.html}}</ref>


==Exploitative Practices==
==Relevant practices==
*'''Post-Sale Function Removal''' – Firmware updates retroactively remove previously available features, such as automatic color registration, for users using non-OEM toner.<ref name="reddit">[https://www.reddit.com/r/printers/comments/s9b2eg Brother MFC firmware update - non-genuine toner now disables critical features.]</ref><ref name="reddit-2">[https://www.reddit.com/r/printers/comments/w60687/brother_mfcl3370cdw_firmware_downgrade_needed/ Brother MFC-L3370CDW Firmware Downgrade needed]</ref>
*'''Post-Sale Function Removal''' – Firmware updates retroactively remove previously available features, such as automatic color registration, for users using non-OEM toner.<ref name="reddit">[https://www.reddit.com/r/printers/comments/s9b2eg Brother MFC firmware update - non-genuine toner now disables critical features.]</ref><ref name="reddit-2">[https://www.reddit.com/r/printers/comments/w60687/brother_mfcl3370cdw_firmware_downgrade_needed/ Brother MFC-L3370CDW Firmware Downgrade needed]</ref>
*'''Vendor lock-in via DRM''' – Printers continue to function with third-party toner but print at lower quality unless OEM toner is installed.<ref name=":0" />
*'''Vendor lock-in via DRM''' – Printers continue to function with third-party toner but print at lower quality unless OEM toner is installed.<ref name=":0" />
Line 19: Line 18:
*Older firmware versions are removed from Brother’s servers, preventing firmware downgrades that would fix the issue while also allowing consumers to use their preferred toner.<ref name="github-ohbrother">[https://github.com/CauldronDevelopmentLLC/oh-brother/issues/30 Discussion on firmware rollback for Brother printers.]</ref>
*Older firmware versions are removed from Brother’s servers, preventing firmware downgrades that would fix the issue while also allowing consumers to use their preferred toner.<ref name="github-ohbrother">[https://github.com/CauldronDevelopmentLLC/oh-brother/issues/30 Discussion on firmware rollback for Brother printers.]</ref>


==Impact on Consumer Protection==
==Impact on consumer protection==
*Consumers may no longer use the ink provider of their choice without compromising the functionality of their printer.
*Consumers may no longer use the ink provider of their choice without compromising the functionality of their printer.
*Consumers previously able to save money by purchasing third-party toner are now required to purchase OEM toner at a higher cost to maintain printer functionality.
*Consumers previously able to save money by purchasing third-party toner are now required to purchase OEM toner at a higher cost to maintain printer functionality.
*Brother’s consumer-friendly reputation for allowing third-party toner is now tarnished.
*No prior warning of change in the printer's core functionality had been given before these firmware updates were installed.
*No prior warning of change in the printer's core functionality had been given before these firmware updates were installed.
*Workarounds tend to involve blocking the firmware updates or attempting downgrading the firmware, both of which Brother actively discourages.
*Workarounds tend to involve blocking the firmware updates or attempting downgrading the firmware, both of which Brother actively discourages.
Line 53: Line 51:
*This is similar to [[HP Dynamic Security]], which blocks non-OEM cartridges.
*This is similar to [[HP Dynamic Security]], which blocks non-OEM cartridges.


===Quality Example===
===Quality example===
[[File:Brother HL-L9310CDW 1.69 1.32 before registration deleted.png|alt=Brother HL-L9310CDW 1.69 1.32, before deletion of colour registration.|none|thumb|800x800px|Brother HL-L9310CDW 1.69 1.32, before deletion of color registration.]]
[[File:Brother HL-L9310CDW 1.69 1.32 before registration deleted.png|alt=Brother HL-L9310CDW 1.69 1.32, before deletion of colour registration.|none|thumb|800x800px|Brother HL-L9310CDW 1.69 1.32, before deletion of color registration.]]


Line 69: Line 67:
|}
|}


==Potential legal implications==
If the removal of core printing functionality after purchase is deliberate, this action may qualify as a deceptive trade practice in multiple jurisdictions.
Removal of previous workable firmware versions from the company's website may indicate the company's willful lock-out of consumer choice, effectively forcing purchases that do not align with the consumer's preferences.


==Mitigations available to users==
==Mitigations available to users==