Whaling (gaming industry term): Difference between revisions

Moovie (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Moovie (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
 
Line 33: Line 33:
Although the gaming industry often frames ''whaling'' as a harmless and even innovative business model, the underlying mechanics raise serious consumer rights and ethical concerns. The ''Let’s Go Whaling'' presentation makes clear that these systems are deliberately engineered to maximize profit, often at the expense of vulnerable players.
Although the gaming industry often frames ''whaling'' as a harmless and even innovative business model, the underlying mechanics raise serious consumer rights and ethical concerns. The ''Let’s Go Whaling'' presentation makes clear that these systems are deliberately engineered to maximize profit, often at the expense of vulnerable players.


1. Psychological Manipulation
Psychological Manipulation


These mechanics draw directly from behavioral conditioning and casino playbooks:
These mechanics draw directly from behavioral conditioning and casino playbooks:
Line 41: Line 41:
*Social features create peer pressure to spend in order to maintain status or support a team.
*Social features create peer pressure to spend in order to maintain status or support a team.


2. Lack of Informed Consent
Lack of Informed Consent


Players are rarely provided with:
Players are rarely provided with:
Line 50: Line 50:


Without these safeguards, informed decision-making is undermined.
Without these safeguards, informed decision-making is undermined.
Ethics as an Afterthought
In the ''Let’s Go Whaling'' talk, moral considerations are explicitly deferred until the end, framing them as an optional discussion rather than a central responsibility. This communicates a troubling industry norm: profit maximization first, ethics second. When ethics are treated as an afterthought, it signals that consumer well-being is a secondary concern rather than a guiding principle in design.


Regulatory Blind Spots
Regulatory Blind Spots